Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 257–270 | Cite as

Construction of three-dimensional images of flow structure via particle tracking techniques

  • O. Robinson
  • D. Rockwell
Originals

Abstract

Construction of three-dimensional images of flow structure, based on the quantitative velocity field, is assessed for cases where experimental data are obtained using particle tracking technique. The experimental data are in the form of contiguous planes of particle images. These contiguous data planes are assumed to correspond to successive spatial realizations in steady flow, or to phase-referenced realizations in an unsteady flow.

Given the particle images on contiguous planes, the in-plane velocity fields are determined. Then, the out-of-plane velocity field is obtained using a spectral interpolation method. Application of this method allows, in principle, construction of the three-dimensional vorticity field and the streamline patterns.

A critical assessment is made of the uncertainties arising from the in-plane interpolation of the velocity field obtained from particle tracking and the evaluation of the out-of-plane velocity component. The consequences of such uncertainties on the reconstructed vorticity distributions and streamline patterns are addressed for two basic types of vortex flows: a columnar vortex, for which the streamlines are not closed and are spatially periodic in the streamwise direction; and for a spherical (Hill's) vortex exhibiting closed streamline patterns, and no spatial periodicity.

Keywords

Vortex Vorticity Velocity Field Particle Image Unsteady Flow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adrian, R. J. 1984: Scattering particle characteristics and their effect on pulsed laser measurements on fluid flow: speckle velocimetry vs. particle velocimetry. Appl. Optics. 23, 1690–1691Google Scholar
  2. Adrian, R. J. 1986: Multi-point optical measurements of simultaneous vectors in unsteady flow -a review. Inter. J. Heat and Fluid Flow. 7, 127–145Google Scholar
  3. Adrian, R. J. 1991: Particle imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 261–304Google Scholar
  4. Adrian, R. J.; Landreth, C. C.; French, D. T.; Fensler, T. D.; Reuss, D. L. 1989: Instantaneous planar measurements of velocity and large-scale vorticity and strain rate in an engine using particle image velocimetry. SAE Technical Paper. Series 890616Google Scholar
  5. Adrian, R. J.; Yao, C. S. 1985: Pulsed laser technique application to liquid and gaseous flows and the scattering power of the seed particles. Appl. Optics. 24, 44–52Google Scholar
  6. Agüi, J. C.; Jiménez, J. 1987: On the performance of particle tracking. J. Fluid Mech. 185, 447–468Google Scholar
  7. Akima, H. 1978: A method of bivariate interpolation and smooth surface fitting for irregularly distributed data points. ACM Trans. Math. Soft. 4, 148–155Google Scholar
  8. Batchelor, G. K. 1964: Axial flow in trailing line vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 20, 645–658Google Scholar
  9. Cline, A. K.; Renka, R. J. 1984: A triangle based C 1 interpolation method. Rocky Mount. J. Math. 14Google Scholar
  10. Dimotakis, P. E.; Debussy, F. D.; Koochesfahani, M. M. 1981: Particle streak velocity field measurements in a 2-D mixing layer. Phys. Fluids. 24 (6)Google Scholar
  11. Gharib, M.; Willert, C. 1987: Particle tracing: revisited. In Advances in Fluid Mechanics Measurements. Lect. Notes Eng. Springer Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Gottlieb, D.; Orszag, S. A. 1977: Numerical analysis of spectral methods: theory and applications. SIAMGoogle Scholar
  13. Hesselink, L. 1988: Digital image processing in flow visualization. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 421–485Google Scholar
  14. IMSL 1987: Math library user's manual. Version 1.0. HoustonGoogle Scholar
  15. Lamb, H. 1945: Hydrodynamics. DoverGoogle Scholar
  16. Lessen, M.; Paillet, F.; Singh, P. J. 1974: The stability of a trailing line vortex. Part 1: inviscid theory. J. Fluid Mech. 63, 753–763Google Scholar
  17. Lourenco, L.; Krothapalli, A. 1987: The role of photographic parameters in laser speckle or particle image displacement velocimetry. Exp. Fluids. 5, 29–32Google Scholar
  18. Lourenco, L.; Krothapalli, A.; Buchlan, J. N.; Riethmuller, M. L. 1986: Non-invasive experimental technique for the measurement of unsteady velocity fields, AIAA J. 24, 1715–1717Google Scholar
  19. Nguyen Duc, J. M.; Sommeria, J. 1988: Experimental characterization of steady two-dimensional vortex couples. J. Fluid Mech. 192, 175–192Google Scholar
  20. Ongoren, A.; Chen, J.; Rockwell, D. 1987: Multiple time-surface characterization of time-dependent, three-dimensional flows. Exp. Fluids. 5, 418–422Google Scholar
  21. Paihua, L. 1978: Méthodes numériques pour le calcul de fonctions splines à une ou plusieurs variables. Thèse de 3ème cycle. Grenoble, FranceGoogle Scholar
  22. Perry, A. E.; Tan, D. K. 1984: Simple 3-d vortex motions in coflowing jets and wakes. J. Fluid Mech. 141, 197–231Google Scholar
  23. Press, W. H.; Flannery B. P.; Teukolsky, S. A.; Vetterling, W. T. 1986: Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge U. PressGoogle Scholar
  24. Rockwell, D.; Atta, R.; Kramer, L.; Lawson, R.; Lusseyran, D.; Magness, C.; Sohn, D.; and Staubli, T. 1987: Structure of unsteady flow at leading- and trailing-edges: flow visualization and its interpretation. In: AGARD Conference Proceedings No. 413, Aerodynamic and Related Hydrodynamic Studies Using Water Facilities. AGARDC-CP-413, 29-1-29-13Google Scholar
  25. Rockwell, D.; Atta, R.; Kuo, C.-H.; Hefele, C.; Magness, C.; Utsch, T. 1988: On unsteady flow structure from swept edges subjected to controlled motion, Proceedings of Workshop II on Unsteady Separated Flow, Frank J. Seiler Research Laboratory Report No. FJSRL-Tr-88–0004. (Based on presentation at AFOSR Workshop on Unsteady and Separated Flows, U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colorado, July 26–30, 1987.)Google Scholar
  26. Shampine, L. F.; Gordon, M. K. 1975: Computer solution of ordinary differential equations. FreemanGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith, C. R.; Paxson, R. D. 1983: A technique of evaluating three-dimensional behavior in turbulent boundary layers using computer-augmented hydrogen-bubble-wire flow visualization. Exp. Fluids. 1, 33–49Google Scholar
  28. Smith, C. R.; Paxson, R. D. 1985: Computer-augmented hydrogen bubble-wire flow visualization of turbulent boundary layers. In: Flow Visualization III. (ed. Yang, W. J.) 185–189. Washington: Hemisphere PressGoogle Scholar
  29. Spedding, G. R.; Maxworthy, T.; Rignot, E. 1987: Unsteady vortex flows over delta wings. Proc. 2nd AFOSR Workshop on Unsteady and Separated Flows. Colorado Springs, 283–288Google Scholar
  30. Yoda, M.; Hesselink, L. 1989: Three-dimensional measurement, display, and interpretation of fluid flow data sets. In: Proceedings of S.P.I.E. — The International Society of Optical Engineering: Three-Dimensional Visualization and Display Technologies, (ed. Robbins, W. E. and Fisher, S. S.). 1983, 112–117Google Scholar
  31. Weinstein, L. M.; Beeler, G. B. 1987: Flow measurements in a water tunnel using a holocinematographic velocimeter. In: AGARD Conference Proceedings No. 413, Aerodynamic and related hydrodynamic Studies Using Water Facilities. AGARD C-413, 16-1–16-7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Robinson
    • 1
  • D. Rockwell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering and MechanicsLehigh UniversityBethlehem

Personalised recommendations