Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 178, Issue 3, pp 427–434 | Cite as

Acoustic distortion products from the cochlea of the blind African mole rat, Cryptomys spec.

  • M. Kössl
  • G. Frank
  • H. Burda
  • M. Müller
Original Paper

Abstract

The measurement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions is a noninvasive method that can be used for assessing the sensitivity and the frequency tuning of nonlinear cochlear mechanics. During stimulation with two pure tones f1 and f2, the acoustic 2f1-f2 distortion was recorded in the ear canal of Cryptomys spec. to study specializations in cochlear mechanics that could be associated with the presence of a frequency expanded cochlear region between 0.8–1 kHz. In addition, a distortion threshold curve was obtained which describes relative threshold of nonlinear cochlear mechanics. Sensitive distortion thresholds could be measured for stimulus frequencies between 0.4 to 18 kHz with a broad minimum between 0.75 to 2.5 kHz. The distortion threshold curve extends to higher frequencies than previous neuronal data indicated.

As a measure of mechanical tuning sharpness in the cochlea, suppression tuning curves of 2f1-f2 were recorded. The tuning curves reflected the typical mammalian pattern with shallow low frequency and steep high frequency slopes. Their tuning sharpness was poor with Q10dB values between 0.3 and 1.88. In the range of the frequency expanded region, the Q10dB values were below 0.5. This finding emphasizes that the presence of frequency expansion does not necessarily lead to enhanced mechanical tuning in the cochlea and one has to consider if in certain bat species with cochlear frequency expansion and particularly sharp cochlear tuning, the two phenomena may not be interlinked.

Key words

Otoacoustic emissions Cochlea Acoustic fovea CF-bats 

Abbreviations

CF

constant frequency component of echolocation call

STC

suppression tuning curve

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown AM (1987) Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: A comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils. Hearing Res 31: 25–38Google Scholar
  2. Brown AM, Gaskill SA (1990) Measurment of acoustic distortions reveals underlying similarities between human and rodent responses. J Acoust Soc Am 88: 840–849Google Scholar
  3. Brown AM, Kemp DT (1984) Suppressibility of the 2f1-f2 stimulated acoustic emission in gerbil and man. Hearing Res 42: 143–156Google Scholar
  4. Brown AM, Gaskill SA, Williams DM (1992) Mechanical filtering of sound in the inner ear. Proc R Soc Lond B 250: 29–34Google Scholar
  5. Bruns V (1976) Peripheral auditory tuning for fine frequency analysis by the CF-FM bat Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. II. Frequency mapping in the cochlea. J Comp Physiol 106: 87–97Google Scholar
  6. Bruns V, Schmieszek E (1980) Cochlear innervation in the greater horseshoe bat, demonstration of an acoustic fovea. Hearing Res 3: 27–43Google Scholar
  7. Bruns V, Müller M, Hofer W, Heth G, Nevo E (1988) Inner ear structure and electrophysiological audiograms of the subterranean mole rat Spalax ehrenbergi. Hearing Res 33: 1–10Google Scholar
  8. Dallos P (1992) The active cochlea. J Neurosci 12: 4575–4585PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Evans EF (1975) Cochlear nerve and cochlear nucleus. In: Keidel WD, Neff WD (eds) Handbook of Sensory Physiology Vol.V/2. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 1–108Google Scholar
  10. Filippucci MG, Burda H, Nevo E, Kocka J (1994) Allozyme divergence and systematics of common mole-rats (Cryptomys, Bathyergidae, Rodentia) from Zambia. Z Säugetierk 59: 42–51Google Scholar
  11. Frank G, Kössl M (1995) The shape of 2f1-f2 suppression tuning curves reflect basilar membrane specializations in the mustached bat. Hearing Res 83: 151–160Google Scholar
  12. Gaskill SA, Brown AM (1990) The behaviour of the acoustic distortion product 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am 88: 821–839Google Scholar
  13. Harris FP, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Stagner BB, Coats AC, Martin GK (1989) Acoustic distortion products in humans: Systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f2/f1 ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 85: 220–229Google Scholar
  14. Harris FP, Probst R, Xu L (1992) Suppression of the 2f1-f2 otoacoustic emission in humans. Hearing Res 64: 133–141Google Scholar
  15. Heffner RS, Heffner HE (1992) Hearing and sound localization in blind mole rats (Spalax ehrenbergi). Hearing Res 62: 206–216Google Scholar
  16. Heffner RS, Heffner RE (1993) Degenerate hearing and sound localization in naked mole rats (Heterocephalus glaber) with an overview of central auditory structures. J Comp Neurol 331: 418–433PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Heffner RS, Heffner HE, Contos C, Kearns D (1994) Hearing in prairie dogs: Transition between surface and subterranean rodents. Hearing Res 73: 185–189Google Scholar
  18. Hudspeth AJ, Gillespie PG (1994) Pulling strings to tune transduction: adaptation by hair cells. Neuron 12: 1–9Google Scholar
  19. Kössl M (1992) High frequency distortion products from the ears of two bat species, Megaderma lyra and Carollia perspicillata. Hearing Res 60: 156–164Google Scholar
  20. Kössl M (1994) Otocaoustic emissions from the cochlea of the ‘constant frequency’ bats, Pteronotus parnellii and Rhinolophus rouxi. Hearing Res 72: 59–72Google Scholar
  21. Kössl M, Russell IJ (1995) Basilar membrane resonance in the cochlea of the mustached bat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 276–279Google Scholar
  22. Kössl M, Vater M (1985) The cochlear frequency map of the mustache bat, Pteronotus parnellii. J Comp Physiol A 157: 687–697Google Scholar
  23. Kössl M, Vater M (1990) Resonance phenomena in the cochlea of the mustache bat and their contribution to neuronal response characteristics in the cochlear nucleus. J Comp Physiol A 166: 711–720Google Scholar
  24. Kössl M, Vater M (1995) Cochlear structure and function in bats. In: Popper A, Fay R (eds) Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, Vol. 11. Hearing by Bats. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 191–235Google Scholar
  25. Kummer P, Jannsen T, Arnold W (1995) Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 98: 197–210Google Scholar
  26. Laube B (1991) Struktur und Funktion der peripheren Hörsystems von Cryptomys hottentottus. Diploma Thesis, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt, MGoogle Scholar
  27. Müller M, Burda H (1989) Restricted hearing range in a subterranean rodent, Cryptomys hottentottus (Bathyergidae). Naturwissenschaften 76: 134–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Müller M, Laube B, Burda H, Bruns B (1992) Structure and function in the cochlea of the African mole rat (Cryptomys hottentottus): evidence for a low frequency acoustic fovea. J Comp Physiol A 171: 469–476PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Neuweiler G (1990) Auditory adaptations for prey capture in echolocating bats. Physiol Rev 70: 615–641Google Scholar
  30. Rübsamen R, Neuweiler G, Sripathi K (1988) Comparative collicular tonotopy in two bat species adapted to movement detection, Hipposideros speoris and Megaderma lyra. J Comp Physiol A 163: 271–285Google Scholar
  31. Sterbing S, Rübsamen R, Schmidt U (1990) Auditory midbrain frequency-place code and audio-vocal interaction during postnatal development in the phyllostomid bat, Carollia perspicillata. In: Elsner N, Roth G (eds) Proc 18th Göttingen Neurobiol Conf, G Thieme, Stuttgart, p 140Google Scholar
  32. Schmidt S, Türke B, Vogler B (1984) Behavioural audiograms from the bat, Megaderma lyra. Myotis 22: 62–66Google Scholar
  33. Vater M, Feng A, Betz M (1985) An HRP-study of the frequency-place map of the horseshoe bat cochlea: morphological correlates of the sharp tuning to a narrow frequency band. J Comp Physiol A 157: 671–686Google Scholar
  34. Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK (1992) Evidence for two discrete sources for 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. J Acoust Soc Am 91: 1587–1607Google Scholar
  35. Zook JM, Leake PA (1989) Connections and frequency representation in the auditory brainstem of the mustache bat, Pteronotus parnellii. J Comp Neurol 290: 243–261Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Kössl
    • 1
  • G. Frank
    • 1
  • H. Burda
    • 2
  • M. Müller
    • 2
  1. 1.Zoologisches Institut der Universität MünchenMünchenGermany
  2. 2.Klinikum der Johann-Wolfgaug-Goethe UniversitätFrankfurt a.M.Germany

Personalised recommendations