Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 178, Issue 3, pp 329–336 | Cite as

Control mechanisms of the behavior ‘secondary defense’ in the grasshopper Gomphocerus rufus L. (Gomphocerinae: Orthoptera)

  • R. Hartmann
  • W. Loher
Original Paper

Abstract

In the female grasshopper Gomphocerus rufus mating elicits ‘secondary defense’ which makes remating impossible. The behavioral change is caused by the liquid white secretions, proteins of less than 90 kD, which are produced by the white tubuli of the male's accessory glands. Experimental injection of the white secretions directly into the spermathecal duct of receptive virgins provokes ‘secondary defense’ instantly whereas sperm transfer had no such effect. ‘Secondary defense’ is also released by eggs entering the oviducts and excerting pressure against the oviductal walls on their way to oviposition.

Key words

Grasshopper Sexual behavior Spermatophore Accessory gland secretion Surgical ablations Biochemistry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chen PS, Stumm-Zollinger E, Aigaki T, Balmer J, Bienz M, Bohla P (1988) A male accessory gland peptide that regulates reproductive behavior of female Drosophila melanogaster. Cell 54 (3): 291–298Google Scholar
  2. Friedel T, Gillott C (1977) Contribution of male-produced proteins to vitellogenesis in Malanoplus sanguinipes. J Insect Physiol. 23: 145–151Google Scholar
  3. Giebultowicz JM, Raina AK, Ridgway RL (1991) Role of the spermatheca in the termination of sex pheromone production in mated gypsy moth females. In: Hrdy I (ed) Proc Insect Chem Ecol, Tabor 1990, pp 101–104Google Scholar
  4. Hartmann R (1970) Experimentelle und histologische Untersuchungen der Spermatophorenbildung bei der Feldheuschrecke Gomphocerus rufus L. (Orthoptera, Acrididae). Z Morph Tiere 68: 140–176Google Scholar
  5. Hartmann R (1971) Der Einfluß endokriner Faktoren auf die män nlichen Akzessorischen Drüsen und die Ovarien bei der Keulenheuschrecke Gomphocerus rufus L. (Orthoptera, Acrididae). Z Vergl Physiol 74: 190–216Google Scholar
  6. Hartmann R (1978) The juvenile hormone-carrier in the haemolymph of the acridine grasshopper Gomphocerus rufus L.: Blocking of the juvenile hormone's action by means of repeated injections of an antibody to the carrier. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 184: 301–324Google Scholar
  7. Hartmann R, Loher W (1974) Control of sexual behavior pattern ‘secondary defence’ in the female grasshopper Chorthippus curtipennis. J Insect Physiol 20: 1713–1728Google Scholar
  8. Heady SE (1993) Factors affecting female sexual receptivity in the planthopper Prokelisia dolus. Physiol Entomol 18 (3): 263–270Google Scholar
  9. Heukeshoven J, Dernick R (1988) Improved silver staining procedure for fast staining in Phast System development unit. I. Staining of sodium dodecyl sulfate gels. Electrophoresis 9: 28–32Google Scholar
  10. Hihara F (1981) Effects of the male accessory gland secretion on oviposition and remating in females of Drosophila melanogaster. Zool Mag (Tokyo) 90 (3): 307–316Google Scholar
  11. Hunter-Jones P (1960) Fertilization of eggs in the desert locust by spermatozoa from successive copulations. Nature 185: 336Google Scholar
  12. Jacobs W (1953) Verhaltensbiologische Studien an Feldheuschrecken. Beih. 1. Z Tierpsychol 228 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaulenas MS (1992) Insect accessory reproductive structures. Zoophysiology 31: 123–157Google Scholar
  14. Laemli UK (1970) Clevage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680–686PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Loher W (1966) Die Steuerung sexueller Verhaltensweisen und der Oocytenentwicklung bei Gomphocerus rufus L. Z Vergl Physiol 53: 277–316Google Scholar
  16. Loher W, Huber F (1964) Experimentelle Untersuchungen am Sexualverhalten des Weibchens der Heuschrecke Gomphocerus rufus L. (Acrididae). J Insect Physiol 10: 13–36Google Scholar
  17. Loher W, Dambach M (1989) Reproductive behavior. In: Huber F, Moore TE, Loher W (eds) Cricket Behavior and Neurobiology Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London, pp 43–82Google Scholar
  18. Loher W, Huber F (1965) Nervous and endocrine control of sexual behaviour in a grasshopper (Gomphocerus rufus L.: Acrididae). Symp Soc Exp Biol 20: 381–400Google Scholar
  19. Mann Th (1984) Spermatophores. Development, structure, biochemical attributes and role in the transfer of spermatozoa. Zoophysiology 15: 217 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Maurer HR (1971) Disc electrophoresis and related techniques of polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis 2. Auflage. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Obara Y (1982) Mate refusal hormone in the cabbage white butterfly. Naturwissenschaften 69: 551Google Scholar
  22. Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insect. Biol Rev 45: 525–567Google Scholar
  23. Raina AK (1989) Male induced termination of sex pheromone production and repetivity in mated females of Heliothis zea. J Insect Physiol 35 (11): 821–826Google Scholar
  24. Raina AK, Kingan TG, Giebultowicz JM (1994) Mating-induced loss of sex pheromone and sexual receptivity in insects with emphasis on Helicoverpa zea and Lymantria dispar. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 25 (4): 317–327Google Scholar
  25. Renner M (1952) Analyse des Kopulationsbereitschaft des Weibchens der Feldheuschrecke Euthysthyra brachyptera Ocsk in ihrer Abhängigkeit vom Zustand des Geschlechtsapparates. Z Tierpsychol 9: 122–154Google Scholar
  26. Sugawara T (1979) Stretch reception in the bursa copulatrix of the butterfly, Pieris rapae crucivora, and its role in behavior. J Comp Physiol 130: 191–199Google Scholar
  27. Sugawara T (1986) Oviposition behaviour of the cricket Teleogryllus commodus: The site of action of an oviposition-stimulating factor and the role of the nervous system. J Insect Physiol 32: 485–492Google Scholar
  28. Wakler WF (1980) Sperm utilization strategies in nonsocial insects. Am Naturalist 115: 780–799Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Hartmann
    • 1
  • W. Loher
    • 2
  1. 1.Biologisches Institut I, Universität FreiburgFreiburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Science, Policy and ManagementUniversity of California at BerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations