Acrosomal status in fresh and frozen/thawed stallion spermatozoa evaluated by scanning electron microscopy
- 45 Downloads
- 9 Citations
Abstract
Semen from stallions with equal fertility at natural services, but yielding semen with either satisfactory or poor fertilizing capability after freezing and thawing, was processed for scanning electron microscopy before and after freezing and thawing. In all fresh semen samples the following three categories of acrosomal defect were noticed: (1) minor fenestrations of the plasma membrane (PM) and outer acrosomal membrane (OAM), (2) complete vesiculation and loss of PM and OAM and (3) lack of a large circular part of PM and OAM. The frequency of these defects ranged from 15% to 27%. All frozen and thawed samples displayed defects of categories 1–3 at similar frequencies as the fresh ones. However, additional defects categorized as: (4) major fenestrations of PM and OAM and (5) complete vesiculation of PM and OAM without loss of the vesicles were noted upon freezing and thawing. The total frequency of defects categorized as 4 and 5 ranged from 8% to 21%, and they seemed to be more frequent in stallions with poor fertility after freezing and thawing although the difference was not significant. Moreover, a particular defect categorized as (6) loosening of the whole acrosomal cap was found exclusively in stallions yielding semen with poor freezability.
Key words
Acrosome Stallion Semen Cryopreservation SEMPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Amann RP, Pickett BW (1987) Principles of cryopreservation and a review of cryopreservation of stallion spermatozoa. Eq Vet Sci 7:145–173Google Scholar
- Bavister BD, Yanagimachi R (1977) The effect of sperm extract and energy sources on the motility and acrosome reaction of hamster spermatozoa in vitro. Biol Reprod 16:228–237Google Scholar
- Bedford JM (1970) Sperm capacitation and fertilization in mammals. Biol Reprod [Suppl 2]:28–158Google Scholar
- Blom E (1983) Pathological conditions in the genital organs and in semen as grounds for rejection of breeding bulls for import or export to and from Denmark. 1958–1982. Nord Veterinaermed 35:105–130Google Scholar
- Blue BJ, Mckinnon AO, Squires EL, Seidel GE Jr, Muscari KT (1989) Capacitation of stallion spermatozoa and fertilisation of equine oocytes in vitro. Eq Vet J [Suppl 8]:111–116Google Scholar
- Byrd W, Wolf DP (1986) Acrosome status in fresh and capacitated human ejaculated sperm. Biol Reprod 34:859–869Google Scholar
- Crozet N (1984) Ultrastructural apects of in vivo fertilization in the cow. Gamete Res 10:241–251Google Scholar
- De Martino C, Francavilla S, Fabrinni A, Accinni L (1989) Mammalian spermatogenesis and disorders in man. In: Van Blerkom X, Motta Y (eds) Ultrastructure of human gametogenesis and early embryogenesis. Kluwer, London, pp 1–32Google Scholar
- Fléchon JE (1985) Sperm surface changes during the acrosome reaction as observed by freeze-fracture. Am J Anat 174:239–248Google Scholar
- Fraser LR (1990) Sperm capacitation and its modulation. In: Bavister BD, Cummins J, Roldan ERS (eds) Fertilization in mammals. Serono Symposia, Norwell, USA, pp 141–153Google Scholar
- Fujita T, Miyoshi M, Tokunaga J (1970) Scanning electron microscopy of human ejaculate spermatozoa with special reference to their abnormal forms. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 105:483–497Google Scholar
- Hafez ESE, Kanagawa H (1973) Scanning electron microscopy of human, monkey and rabbit spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 24:776–787Google Scholar
- Hyttel P, Callesen H, Greve T, Schmidt M (1991) Oocyte maturation and sperm transport in superovulated cattle. Theriogenology 35:91–108Google Scholar
- Langlais J, Roberts KD (1985) A molecular membrane model of sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction of mammalian spermatozoa. Gamete Res 12:183–224Google Scholar
- Lenz RW, Ball GD, Lohse JK, First NL, Ax RL (1983) Chondroitin sulfate facilitates an acrosome reaction in bovine spermatozoa evidenced by light microscopy, electron microscopy and in vitro fertilization. Biol Reprod 28:683–690Google Scholar
- Malik LE, Wilson RB (1975) Evaluation of a modified technique for SEM examination of vertebrate specimens without evaporated metal layers. Scanning Microsc 2:259–264Google Scholar
- Meizel S (1985) Molecules that initiate or help stimulate the acrosome reaction by interaction with the mammalian sperm surface. Am J Anat 174:285–302Google Scholar
- Merkt H, Klug E (1987) Deep freezing of stallion spermatozoa. In: Greve T (ed) Symposium on equine reproduction. DSR, Copenhagen, pp 45–50Google Scholar
- Myles DG, Koppel DE, Primakoff P (1990) Sperm surface domains and fertilization. In: Bavister BD, Cummins J, Roldan ERS (eds) Fertilization in mammals. Serono Symposia, Norwell, USA, pp 169–177Google Scholar
- Parks JE, Ehrenwald E (1990) Cholesterol efflux from mammalian sperm and its potential role in capacitation. In: Bavister BD, Cummins J, Roldan ERS (eds) Fertilization in mammals. Serono Symposia, Norwell, USA, pp 155–153Google Scholar
- Pollard JW, Plante C, King WA, Hansen PJ, Betteridge KJ, Suarez SS (1991) Fertilizing capacity of bovine sperm may be maintained by binding to oviductal epithelial cells. Biol Reprod 44:102–107Google Scholar
- Rostgaard J, Christensen P (1975) A multipurpose specimen-carrier for handling small biological objects through critical point drying. J Microsc 105:107–113Google Scholar
- Samper JC, Hollander JC, Crabo BG (1991) Relationship between the fertility of fresh and frozen stallion semen and semen quality. J Reprod Fertil [Suppl] 44:107–114Google Scholar
- Sathananthan AH, Chen C (1986) Sperm-oocytes membrane fusion in the human during monospermic fertilization. Gamete Res 15:177–185Google Scholar
- Varner DD, Ward CR, Storey BT, Kenney RM (1987) Induction and characterization of acrosome reaction in equine spermatozoa. Am J Vet Res 48:1383–1389Google Scholar
- Verkleij AJ, Humbel B, Studer D, Müller M (1985) ‘Lipidic particle’ systems as visualized by thin-section electron microscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta 812:591–594Google Scholar
- Yanagimachi R (1981) Mechanisms of fertilization in mammals. In: Mastroianni L, Biggers JD (eds) Fertilization and embryonic development in vitro. Plenum Press, New York, pp 81–182Google Scholar