Advertisement

Irrigation Science

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 177–187 | Cite as

Sustainability of conjunctive water use for salinity control in irrigation areas: theory and application to the Shepparton region, Australia

  • J. Bernard Prendergast
  • Calvin W. Rose
  • William L. Hogarth
Article

Abstract

The long term sustainability of conjunctive water use for controlling irrigation salinity is affected by increase in groundwater salinity over time. This paper uses mass conservation of salt and water to assess groundwater degradation over long time scales. Management options which affect this rate of degradation are also examined. The groundwater model developed is illustrated using data from the Shepparton Irrigation Region in the Murray Basin, Australia. The model predicts rapid groundwater deterioration when conjunctive use is conducted over only a fraction of the area of influence of a groundwater pump. Where the pumped aquifer is underlain by deeper groundwaters, the rate of groundwater degradation is also affected by leakage into or out of the conjunctive use system. Surface redistribution of groundwater from pumps installed in zones of regional groundwater discharge to areas recharging the regional groundwaters, reduces excessive degradation in the zones of discharge. With optimal surface distribution of groundwater, the rate of degradation is low. The rate of groundwater degradation also depends on salt inputs from irrigation water and rainfall, and the average depth from the soil surface to the base of the aquifer. The rate of degradation resulting from applied salts in surface water and rainfall is typically about 0.01 dSm-1 per year for shallow aquifers in the Shepparton region, but the rate is lower where deeper aquifers are pumped. Partial irrigation also reduces the rate of degradation because of the reduced rate of salt inputs. Where poorer quality groundwater lies within the area of influence of the groundwater pump, a greater rate of deterioration in the quality of pumped groundwater can be expected from groundwater mixing. In some irrigation regions limited export of groundwater through surface water conveyance structures to a river is possible, so that a regional surface salt balance could be maintained. However, salt exports made equal to the rate of surface imports into the irrigated area will only significantly impact groundwater salinity in the very long term, or where only shallow aquifers can be pumped. In addition, this export can be costly for downstream water users, or if construction of additional conveyance infrastructure is extensive; export can have a detrimental impact on riverine ecosystems. Other management options such as the depth of pump installation and the spatial distribution of irrigation water and pumped groundwater, which affect the redistribution of salts within the groundwater system, have the potential to have a much greater impact on local groundwater salinity.

Keywords

Shallow Aquifer Groundwater Salinity Regional Groundwater Limited Export Irrigation Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown CM (1985) Murray Basin, South Eastern Australia: Stratigraphy and resource potential — a synopis. Bur Mineral Resour, Canberra, Aust, Rep 264Google Scholar
  2. Brown CM, Stephenson AE (1986) Murray Basin subsurface stratigraphic database. Bur Mineral Resour, Canberra, Aust, Rep 262, 60 pGoogle Scholar
  3. Domenico PA (1972) Concepts and models in groundwater hydrology. McGraw-Hill, 405 pGoogle Scholar
  4. Doorenbos J, Pruit WO (1977) Crop water requirements. FAO Irrig and Drain Paper 24. FAO Rome 1984Google Scholar
  5. Evans WR (1988) Preliminary shallow groundwater and salinity map of the Murray Basin. Bur Min Resour, Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  6. Fetter CW (1988) Applied Hydrogeology. Merrill Publishing Company, Columbus, Ohio USA, 43216, 592 pGoogle Scholar
  7. Freeze RA, Witherspoon PA (1967) Theoretical analysis of groundwater flow. 2. The effect of watertable configuration and subsurface permeability variation. Water Resources Res 3:623–634Google Scholar
  8. Heuperman AF (1986) The Tongala groundwater pumping and reuse project. Res Report No 17, Dept of Agric and Rural Affairs, Melbourne, Aust, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  9. Heuperman AF (1988) The Tongala groundwater pumping and reuse project: a pilot study for groundwater table control in the Shepparton Region in Northern Victoria. Agric Water Manag 14:513–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hubbert MK (1940) The theory of groundwater motion. J Geol 48:785–944Google Scholar
  11. Ife D (1988) Hydrogeological mapping of the upper Shepparton Formation, Shepparton Region. Report No 1988/29, Rural Water Commission, Melbourne, Aust, 41 pGoogle Scholar
  12. Lawrence CR, Abele C (1976) Tertiary Murray Basin. In: Douglas JG, Ferguson JA (eds) Geology of Victoria. Spec Publn Geol Soc Aust 5:191–198Google Scholar
  13. Macumber PG (1991) Interactions between groundwater and surface systems in Northern Victoria. Dept Conservation and Environment, Melbourne, AustGoogle Scholar
  14. Murray Darling Basin Ministerial Council (1987) River salinity waterlogging and land salinisation — towards an integrated management strategy. Tech Rep No 87/1, Canberra, Aust, 90 pGoogle Scholar
  15. Nolan J, Reid M (1989) The role of the deep lead pumping for salinity control and resource development within the Shepparton region. Rural Water Comm Rep No 1989/11, 33 pGoogle Scholar
  16. Prendergast JB (1989) Mallee groundwater. In: Noble J, Bradstock J (eds) Mediterranean Landscapes in Australia: Mallee Ecosystems and their Management. CSIRO, Melbourne, Aust, pp 54–79Google Scholar
  17. Prendergast JB, Heuperman AF (1988) Groundwater pumping/reuse in N. Victoria: recharge processes, aquifer salinisation and farm productivity. BMR J Aust Geol Geophys, Groundwater 12:149–154Google Scholar
  18. Prendergast JB, Noble CL (1990) The effect of groundwater reuse on infiltration and groundwater recharge under an irrigated perennial pasture. Proc Murray-Darling 1990 Workshop: Groundwater Research and Management. Mildura, 13–15 Nov 1990. NSW Dept Wat Resour Rep 90.038, Sydney, AustGoogle Scholar
  19. Prendergast JB, Rose CW, Hogarth WL (1994) A model for conjunctive use of groundwater and surface waters for control of irrigation salinity. Irrig Sci 14:187–197Google Scholar
  20. Salinity Program Advisory Council (1989) Draft Shepparton land and water salinity management plan. Govt of Vic, Melbourne, Aust, 151 pGoogle Scholar
  21. Todd DK (1980) Groundwater hydrology. J Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, London, 33 pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Bernard Prendergast
    • 1
  • Calvin W. Rose
    • 2
  • William L. Hogarth
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Sustainable Irrigated AgricultureTaturaAustralia
  2. 2.Griffith UniversityNathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations