Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 172, Issue 2, pp 207–222 | Cite as

Orientation flights of solitary wasps (Cerceris; Sphecidae; Hymenoptera)

II. Similarities between orientation and return flights and the use of motion parallax


Cerceris wasps learn the position of their nest relative to landmarks during the performance of orientation flights. This paper examines the similarities that exist between an orientation flight made on departing from the nest and the subsequent return flight to the nest area.

Returning wasps do not exactly retrace the paths they have flown during the preceding orientation flight. But there are striking similarities: in both types of flight wasps face into similar directions and their orientation depends on their position relative to nest and landmarks in a similar way. During both orientation flights and returns wasps fly along arcs while counter-turning at similar angular velocities. In both flights their flight direction and the retinal position of close landmarks are similar. Wasps on their return thus experience much the same spatio-temporal pattern of visual stimulation on their retina as they generated during their previous orientation flight.

To discover whether wasps exploit the motion parallax information produced by these flights, the arrangement and size of landmarks was altered between the insects' departure and their return. Their search pattern for the hidden nest indicates (i) that they weight close landmarks more heavily than distant ones and (ii) that they frequently search at the appropriate distance from a landmark regardless of its apparent size. Both findings imply that returning wasps recall the patterns of visual motion produced during their orientation flights.

Key words

Insects Hymenoptera Homing Visual spatial memory Landmark orientation Orientation flights 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson AM (1977) A model for landmark learning in the honeybee. J Comp Physiol 114:335–355Google Scholar
  2. Cartwright BA, Collett TS (1979) How honey-bees know their distance from a near-by visual landmark. J Exp Biol 82:367–372Google Scholar
  3. Cartwright BA, Collett TS (1982) How honey bees use landmarks to guide their return to a food source. Nature 295:560–564Google Scholar
  4. Cartwright BA, Collett TS (1983) Landmark learning in bees: experiments and models. J Comp Physiol 151:521–543Google Scholar
  5. Cartwright BA, Collett TS (1987) Landmark maps for honeybees. Biol Cybern 57:85–93Google Scholar
  6. Cheng K, Collett TS, Wehner R (1986) Honeybees learn the colours of landmarks. J Comp Physiol A 159:521–543Google Scholar
  7. Cheng K, Collett TS, Pickhard A, Wehner R (1987) The use of visual landmarks by honeybees: Bees weight landmarks according to their distance to the goal. J Comp Physiol A 161:469–475Google Scholar
  8. Collett TS (1992) Landmark learning and guidance in insects. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 337:295–303Google Scholar
  9. Collett TS, Lehrer M (1993) On the learning of distance cues by honeybees when approaching and leaving a goal and an analysis of their orientation flights. J Comp Physiol A (submitted)Google Scholar
  10. Iersel JJA van (1975) The extension of the orientation system of Bembix rostrata as used in the vicinity of its nest. In: Baerends G, Beer C, Manning A (eds) Function and evolution of behaviour. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 142–168Google Scholar
  11. Iersel JJA van, Assem J van den (1964) Aspects of orientation in the digger wasp Bembix rostrata. Anim Behav Suppl 1:145–162Google Scholar
  12. Lehrer M (1991) Bees which turn back and look. Naturwissenschaften 78:274–276Google Scholar
  13. Lehrer M, Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW, Horridge GA (1988) Motion cues provide the bee's visual world with a third dimension. Nature 332:356–357Google Scholar
  14. Opfinger E (1931) Über die Orientierung der Biene an der Futterquelle. Z Vergl Physiol 15:431–487Google Scholar
  15. Peitsch D, Fietz A, Hertel H, de Souza J, Ventura DF, Menzel R (1992) The spectral input system of hymenopteran insects and their receptor-based colour vision. J Comp Physiol A 170:23–40Google Scholar
  16. Srinivasan MV, Lehrer M, Zhang SW, Horridge GA (1989) How honeybees measure their distance from objects of unknown size. J Comp Physiol A 165:605–613Google Scholar
  17. Srinivasan MV, Lehrer M, Horridge GA (1990) Visual figureground discrimination in the honeybee: the role of motion parallax at boundaries. Proc R Soc Lond B 238:331–350Google Scholar
  18. Tinbergen N, Kruyt W (1938) Über die Orientierung des Bienenwolfes (Philanthus triangulum Fabr.) III. Die Bevorzugung bestimmter Wegmarken. Z Vergl Physiol 25:292–334Google Scholar
  19. Vollbehr J (1975) Zur Orientierung junger Honigbienen bei ihrem 1. Orientierungsflug. Zool Jb Physiol 79:33–69Google Scholar
  20. Wehner R (1981) Spatial vision in arthropods. In: Autrum H (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology vol VII/6C. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 287–616Google Scholar
  21. Wehner R, Räber F (1979) Visual spatial memory in desert ants, Cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Experientia 35:1569–1571Google Scholar
  22. Zeil J (1993) Orientation flights of solitary wasps (Cerceris; Sphecidae; Hymenoptera): I. Description of flight. J Comp Physiol A 172:189–205Google Scholar
  23. Zeil J, Kelber A (1991) Orientation flights in ground-nesting wasps and bees share a common organization. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 84:371–372Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Zeil
    • 1
  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für BiokybernetikUniversität TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations