Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 9, Issue 10, pp 1101–1105 | Cite as

Short-term outcome analysis of a randomized study comparing laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer

  • A. M. Lacy
  • J. C. García-Valdecasas
  • J. M. Piqué
  • S. Delgado
  • E. Campo
  • J. M. Bordas
  • P. Taurá
  • L. Grande
  • J. Fuster
  • J. L. Pacheco
  • J. Visa
Original Articles

Abstract

The authors examined the impact of the laparoscopic approach on the early outcome of resected colon carcinomas. The role of laparoscopic techniques in the treatment of colon carcinomas is questionable. Previous studies have suggested technical feasibility of surgical resections of these cancers by laparoscopic means and have implied a benefit to laparoscopic technique for patients undergoing colorectal resections. A prospective, randomized study was conducted comparing laparoscopic assisted colectomy (LAC) open colectomy (OC) for colon cancer. We present the preliminary results in relation to the short-term outcome and judge the feasibility of the laparoscopic procedure to as a way of performing accurate oncologic resection and staging. Benefit has been demonstrated with LAC in this setting. Passing flatus, oral intake, and discharge from hospital occurred earlier in LAC- than OC-treated patients The mean operative time was significantly longer in the LAC group than in the OC group. The overall morbidity was significantly lower in the LAC group. No significant differences were observed between both groups in the number of lymph nodes removed or the pathological stage following the Astler-Coller modification of the Dukes classification. The laparoscopic approach improves the short-term outcome of segmental colectomies for colon cancer. However, the further follow-up of these patients will allow us to answer in the near future whether or not the LAC may influence the long-term outcome.

Key words

Laparoscopic colectomy Open colectomy Colon cancer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander RJT, Jaques BC, Mitchell KG (1993) Laparoscopically assisted colectomy and wond recurrence (letter). Lancet 341: 249–250Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Astler V, Coller F (1954) The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg 139: 846–851Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beart R (1994) Laparoscopic colectomy: status of the art. Dis Colon Rectum 37 (Suppl): S47-S49Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF (1994) Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy (letter). Lancet 344: 58Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen S, Wexner S (1993) Laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer: the Cleveland Clinic Florida experience. Surg Oncol 2 (Suppl): 35–42Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coller JA (1991) Laparoscopic assisted right hemi-colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 34: 1030–1031Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cushieri A, Dubois F, Mouil JEA (1991) The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 385–387Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dubois F, Berthelot G, Levard H (1989) Cholecystectomy par celioscopies. Presse Med 18: 980–982Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dubois F, Icard P, Berthelholt G, Levard H (1990) Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 211: 60–62Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Falk PM, Beart RW, Wexner SD, Thorson AG, Jagelamn DG, Lavery IC, Johansen OB, Fitzgibbons RJ (1993) Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal. Dis Colon Rectum 36(1): 28–34Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fusco MA, Paluzzi MW (1993) Abdominal wall recurrence after laparoscopic assisted colectomy for adenocarcinoma of the colon. Dis Colon Rectum 36: 858–861Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guillou P, Darzi A, Monson J (1993) Experience with laparoscopic colorectal surgery for malignant disease. Surg Oncol 2 (Suppl): 43–49Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1: 138–143Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Bordas JM, Campo E, Grande L, Fuster J, Andrade E, Cugat E, Gonzalez FX, Delgado S, Visa J, (1995) Estudio comparativo con cirugía convencional y cirugía asistida por laparoscopia en el cancer de colon. Cirugía Espanñola 57(3): 238–239Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Taurá P, Bordas, JM, Grande L, Fuster J, Cugat E, Visa J (1994) Is laparoscopic colectomy a safe procedure in synchronous colorectal carcinoma? Report of a case. Surg Laparosc Endosc (in press)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Monson JR, Darzi A, Carey PD, Guillou PJ (1992) Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic assisted colectomy in an unselected group of patients. Lancet 340: 831–833Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    O'Rourke N, Price P, Kelly S, Sikora K (1993) Tumor inoculation during laparoscopy. Lancet 342: 368Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    O'Rourke NA, Heald RJ (1993) Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 80: 1229–1230Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ramos J, Gupta S, Anthone G, Ortega A, Simons A, Beart R (1994) Laparoscopy and colon cancer. Is the port site at risk? A preliminary report. Arch Surg 129: 897–900Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reddick EJ, Olsen DO (1989) Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. A comparison with mini-lap cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 3(3): 131–133Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scott K, Grace R (1989) Detection of lymph node metastases in colorectal carcinoma before and after fat clearance. Br J Surg 76: 1165–1167Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (eds) (1967) Statistical methods, 6th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IAGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van Ye T, Cattey R, Henry L (1994) Laparoscopically assisted colon resections compare favorably with open technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4(1): 25–31Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Walsh D, Wattchow D, Wilson T (1993) Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic resection of malignancy. Aust N Z J Surg 63: 563–565Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wexner SD, Cohen SM, Johansen OB, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG (1993) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective assessment and current perspective. Br J Surg 80: 1602–1605Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wexner SD, Johansen OB, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG (1992) Laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy. A prospective trial. Dis Colon Rectum 35(7): 651–655Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. M. Lacy
    • 1
  • J. C. García-Valdecasas
    • 1
  • J. M. Piqué
    • 2
  • S. Delgado
    • 1
  • E. Campo
    • 3
  • J. M. Bordas
    • 2
  • P. Taurá
    • 1
  • L. Grande
    • 1
  • J. Fuster
    • 1
  • J. L. Pacheco
    • 1
  • J. Visa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Hospital ClinicUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital ClinicUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Pathology, Hospital ClinicUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations