Human Studies

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 441–458 | Cite as

Getting back into no place: On Casey, deconstruction and the architecture of modernity

  • Thomas Brockelman
Review Essay


Political Philosophy Modern Philosophy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bergren, A. (1992). Architecture Gender Philosophy. In Whiteman, Kipnis and Burdett (Eds.), Strategies in Architectural Thinking. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  2. Casey, E.S. (1993). Getting Back into Place: Toward a Renewed Understanding of the Place-World. Bloomington and Idianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Le Corbusier (1929/87). The City of To-morrow and Its Planning. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  4. Derrida, J. (1972/82). Margins of Philosophy. Trans. with additional notes by A. Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Eisenmann, P. (1989). Blue Line Text. In Papadakis, Cooke and Benjamine (Eds.), Deconstruction: Omnibus Volume. Rizzoli: New York.Google Scholar
  6. Hays, K.M. (1992). Modernism and the Posthumanist Subject: The Architecture of Hannes Meyer and Ludwig Hilberseimer. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  7. Heidegger, M. (1934/75). The Origin of the Work of Art. In and trans A. Hofstadter (Ed) Poetry, Language, Thought. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  8. Hilberseimer, L. (1927). Großstadt Architektur. Stuttgart: J. Hoffmann.Google Scholar
  9. Wigley, M. (1993). The Architecture of Deconstruction: Derrida's Haunt. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Brockelman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyLemoyne CollegeSyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations