Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 152–158 | Cite as

Preliminary study of electrocautery smoke particles produced in vitro and during laparoscopic procedures

  • J. -G. DesCôteaux
  • P. Picard
  • É. C. Poulin
  • M. Baril
Original Articles


Background: The objective of this preliminary study was to describe the particles contained in cautery smoke produced during five laparoscopic procedures and verify the collection method during three laboratory experiments on ex vivo animal tissue.

Methods: A cascade impactor collected the smoke according to particle size, and particle weights were calculated on an electronic microbalance. Electron microscopic analysis and energy dispersive X-ray evaluation were used to determine particle morphology and elemental composition.

Results: The particles, distributed according to size on the seven rotating trays of the impactor, had diameters ranging from 0.05 to >25 μm, with most being 0.1–1 μm. In vitro experiments yielded more particles, especially larger (>5 μm) ones, than the surgical procedures, because the cauterized specimens could be placed much closer to the cascade impactor in the laboratory environment, eliminating most obstacles to particle recovery. In the laparoscopic surgery patients, larger particles, because of their physical properties, were more likely to remain trapped in the abdomen or to drop off in the collection apparatus. Uniformly, two populations of particles were demonstrated—either large, irregular fragments (2–25 μm) rich in carbon and oxygen, suggesting structural cellular components, or small homogeneous spheres (0.1–0.5 μm) composed of sodium, magnesium, calcium, and potassium salts.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the presence of breathable areosols and cell-size fragments in the cautery smoke produced during laparoscopic procedures. Their exact chemical composition and potential adverse effects for patients and personnel are not known.

Key words

Electrocautery smoke Smoke particles Aerosol impactor Laparoscopic surgery 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Allen L, Weatherford T (1959) Role of fenestrated basement membrane in lymphatic absorption from peritoneal cavity. Am J Physiol 19(3): 551–554Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bacon PA (1993) Gas and particle motion. In: Willeke K, Bacon PA (eds) Aerosol measurement. Principles, techniques and application. Nelson Canada, Scarborough, Ontario, Canada, pp 23–41Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baggish MS, Poiesz BM, Joret D, Williamson P, Refai A (1991) Presence of human immunodeficiency virus in laser smoke. Lasers Surg Med 11: 197–203Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartly DL, Chen CC, Song R, Fishback TJ (1994) Respirable aerosol sampler performance testing. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 5: 1036–1046Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bellina JH, Stjernholm RL, Kurpel JE (1982) Analysis of plume emissions after papovirus irradiation with the carbon dioxide laser. J Reprod Med 27(5): 268–270Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Biswas P, Flagan FC (1984) High velocity inertial impactors. Environ Sci Technol 18: 611–616Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheng SY, Yen HC (1979) Particle bounce in cascade impactor. Environ Sci Technol 13: 1392–1396Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gatti JE, Bryant CJ, Noone RB, Murphy JB (1992) The mutagenicity of electrocautery smoke. Plast Reconstr Surg 89: 781–786Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gatti JE, Murphy JB, Noone RB (1986) Analysis of electrocautery smoke produced during reduction mammoplasty. Surg Forum 37: 579–580Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heinsolm P, Jewitt DL (1993) Exposure to blood-containing aerosols in the operating room: a preliminary study. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 54: 446–453Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hering SV, Marple VA (1983) Low pressure and micro-orifice impactor. United States Environment Protection Agency report No. 3D3376NAEXGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoye RC, Ketcham AS, Riggle GC (1967) The air-borne dissemination of viable tumor by high-energy neodymium laser. Life Sci 6: 119–125Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jewett DL, Heinsohn P, Bennett C, Rosen A, Neuilly C (1992) Blood-containing aerosols generated by surgical techniques: a possible infectious hazard. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 53: 228–231Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lill SR, Parsons RH, Buhac I (1979) Permeability of the diaphragm and fluid resorption from the peritoneal cavity in the rat. Gastroenterology 76: 997–1001Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lodge JP Jr (1989) General techniques. In: Lodge JP Jr (ed) Methods of air sampling and analysis, 3rd ed. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea MI, pp 1–239Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nezhat C, Winer WK, Nezhat F, Nezhat C, Forrest D, Reeves WG (1987) Smoke from laser surgery: is there a health hazard? Lasers Surg Med 7: 376–382Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oosterhuis JW, Vershueren RJC, Eibergen R, Oldhoff J (1982) The viability of cells in the waste products of CO2-laser evaporation of Cloudman mouse melanomas. Cancer 49: 61–67Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ott D (1993) Smoke production and smoke reduction in endoscopic surgery: preliminary report. Endosc Surg 1: 230–232Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rudinger G (1980) Fundamentals of gas-particle flow Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Runyon BA (1993) Surgical peritonitis and other diseases of the peritoneum, mesentery, omentum and diaphragm. In: Sleisenger MH, Fordtran JS (eds) Gastrointestinal disease. WB Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shear L, Swartz C, Shinaberger JA, Barry KG (1965) Kinetics of peritoneal fluid absorption in adult man. N Engl J Med 272: 123–127Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Spurny KR (1986) Physical and chemical characterisation of individual airborne particles. Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Taylor RH, Lerman J, Chambers C, Dolovich M (1993) Dosing efficiency and particle-size characteristics of pressurized metereddose inhaler aerosols in narrow catheters. Chest 103: 920–924Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tomita Y, Mihashi S, Nagata K, Ueda S, Fujiki M, Hirano M, Hirohata T (1981) Mutagenicity of smoke condensates induced by CO2-laser irradiation and electrocauterization. Mutat Res 89: 145–149Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tsilibary EC, Wissig SL (1977) Absorption from the peritoneal cavity: SEM study of the mesothelium covering the peritoneal surface of the muscular portion of the diaphragm. Am J Anat 149: 127–133Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vanderpool RW, Rubow KL (1988) Generation of large, solid, monodisperse calibration aerosols. Aerosol Sci Technol 9: 65–69Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weber A, Willeke K, Marchioni R, Myojo T, McKay R, Donnely J, Liebhaber F (1993) Aerosol penetration and leakage characteristics of masks used in the health care industry. Am J Infect Control 21: 167–173Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wenig BL, Stenson KM, Wenig BM, Tracey D (1993) Effects of plume produced by the Nd: YAG laser and electrocautery on the respiratory system. Lasers Surg Med 13: 242–245Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Williamson SJ (1973) Fundamentals of air pollution. Addison-Wesley, ReddingGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    The dangers of laser plume (Editorial) (1990) Health Devices 119: 4Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zink J, Greenway CV (1977) Control of ascites absorption in anesthetized cats: effects of intraperitoneal pressure, protein, and furosemide diuresis. Gastroenterology 73: 1119–1124Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. -G. DesCôteaux
    • 1
  • P. Picard
    • 2
  • É. C. Poulin
    • 1
  • M. Baril
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryHôpital du Saint-SacrementQuébecCanada
  2. 2.Department of Physics, Pavillon VachonCité Universitaire, Université LavalQuébecCanada

Personalised recommendations