Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 228–236 | Cite as

Estimation of velocity eigenfunction and vorticity distributions from the timeline visualization technique

  • D. Lusseyran
  • D. Rockwell
Originals

Abstract

For the case of quasi-periodic flow, it is demonstrated that use of the hydrogen bubble timeline method leads to reasonable estimates of the eigenfunction of the streamwise velocity fluctuation. Both amplitude and phase distributions across an unstable wake flow are well-approximated. It is shown that the vorticity extrema, as well as the degree of concentration of vorticity, are in good agreement with those calculated from linear stability theory. A critical assessment is given of the possible uncertainties associated with this technique: the existence of a finite, but unknown cross-stream velocity component; bubble rise due to buoyancy effects; wake defect created downstream of the bubble wire; and resolution of the digitized image. Furthermore, the uncertainty in the streamwise velocity, arising from existence of a finite cross-stream velocity component, is actually less than that corresponding to a single-element hot film probe over certain regimes of operation.

Keywords

Vorticity Streamwise Velocity Buoyancy Effect Hydrogen Bubble Wake Flow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abernathy, F. H.; Bertschy, J. R.; Chen, R. W. 1977: Turbulence spectra using laser-Doppler anemometry and selected seeding. Proceedings of 5th Symposium on Turbulence (eds. Patterson, G. K.; Zakin, J. L.) pp. 133–142. University of Missouri-RollaGoogle Scholar
  2. Betchov, R.; Criminale, W. O. 1967: Stability of parallel flows. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradshaw, P. 1971: An introduction to turbulence and its measurement. New York: Pergamon PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Grass, A. J. 1971: Structural features of turbulent flow over smooth and rough boundaries. J. Fluid Mech. 50, 223–255Google Scholar
  5. Gumas, C.; Rockwell, D. 1986: The Fourier descriptor technique: A means of pattern recognition in fluid mechanics. (To be submitted for publication)Google Scholar
  6. Lu, L.-J.; Smith, C. 1986: Image processing of hydrogen bubble flow visualization for determination of turbulence statistics and bursting characteristics. Exp. Fluids 3, 349–356Google Scholar
  7. Lusseyran, D.; Rockwell, D. 1986: On interpretation of flow-visualization in unsteady shear flows. Unpublished report available from Dept. of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem/Pa, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Mattingly, G. E.; Criminale, W. O. 1972: The stability of an incompressible two-dimensional wake. J. Fluid Mech. 51, 233–273Google Scholar
  9. Ongoren, A.; Chen, J.; Rockwell, D. 1988: Multiple-time-surfacc characterization of time-dependent, three-dimensional flows. (Submitted to) Exp. FluidsGoogle Scholar
  10. Schraub, F. A.; Kline, S. J.; Henry, J.; Runstadtler, P. W.; Littell, A. 1965: Use of hydrogen bubbles for quantitative determination of time-dependent velocity fields in low-speed water flows. J. Basic Eng. 7, 429–444Google Scholar
  11. Smith, C. R.; Paxson, R. D. 1983: The technique for evaluation of three-dimensional behavior in turbulent boundary layers using computer augmented hydrogen bubble-wire flow visualization. Exp. Fluids 1, 43–49Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Lusseyran
    • 1
  • D. Rockwell
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Mechanical Engineering and MechanicsLehigh UniversityBethlehemUSA

Personalised recommendations