Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 166, Issue 6, pp 915–927 | Cite as

Responses and locations of neurones in the locust metathoracic femoral chordotonal organ

  • Thomas Matheson
Article

Summary

Insect legs possess chordotonal organs which monitor leg angle, and the direction, velocity and acceleration of leg movements. The locust metathoracic femoral chordotonal organ (mtFCO) has previously been studied morphologically and physiologically, but no detailed analysis of the responses of individual neurones, and their location in the organ has so far been produced. By recording from, and staining mtFCO neurones I have been able to compile for the first time such a map. The distribution of neurone somata in the locust mtFCO is more complex than previously thought: receptors sensitive to both stretch and relaxation of the apodeme are distributed throughout the organ. Seventeen response types were encountered. Neurones with a particular response type have somata in comparable locations within the mtFCO. Comparisons are made between the response types found in the stick insect and those in the locust. The possible functions of some of the responses are discussed.

Key words

Locust Femoral chordontal organ Proprioceptor Walking 

Abbreviation

(mt)FCO

(metathoracic) femoral chordotonal organ

F-T

femur-tibia

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bacon JP, Altman JS (1977) A silver intensification method for cobalt-filled neurones in wholemount preparations. Brain Res 138:359–363Google Scholar
  2. Bässler U (1965) Proprioreceptoren am Subcoxal- und Femur-Tibia-Gelenk der Stabheuschrecke Carausius morosus und ihre Rolle bei der Wahrnehmung der Schwerkraftrichtung. Kybernetik 2:168–193Google Scholar
  3. Bässler U (1976) Reversal of a reflex to a single motoneurone in the stick insect Carausius morosus. Biol Cybern 24:47–49Google Scholar
  4. Bässler U, Hofmann T, Schuch U (1986) Assisting components within a resistance reflex of the stick insect, Cuniculina impigra. Physiol Entomol 11:359–366Google Scholar
  5. Burns MD (1973) The control of walking in Orthoptera. I. Leg movements in normal walking. J Exp Biol 58:45–58Google Scholar
  6. Burns MD (1974) Structure and physiology of the locust femoral chordotonal organ. J Insect Physiol 20:1319–1339Google Scholar
  7. Burrows M (1988) Responses of spiking local interneurones in the locust to proprioceptive signals from the femoral chordotonal organ. J Comp Physiol A 164:207–217Google Scholar
  8. Burrows M, Laurent GJ, Field LH (1988) Proprioceptive inputs to nonspiking local interneurons contribute to local reflexes of a locust hindleg. J Neurosci 8:3085–3093Google Scholar
  9. Büschges A (1989) Processing of sensory input from the femoral chordotonal organ by spiking interneurones of stick insects. J Exp Biol 144:81–111Google Scholar
  10. Field LH, Burrows M (1982) Reflex effects of the femoral chordotonal organ upon leg motor neurones of the locust. J Exp Biol 101:265–285Google Scholar
  11. Field LH, Pflüger HJ (in press) The femoral chordotonal organ: (Locusta migratoria) A bifunctional Orthopterane sense organ? Comp Biochem PhysiolGoogle Scholar
  12. Field LH, Rind FC (1981) A single insect chordotonal organ mediates inter- and intra-segmental leg reflexes. Comp Biochem Physiol 68A:99–102Google Scholar
  13. Hartman HB, Boettiger G (1967) The functional organisation of the propus-dactylus organ in Cancer irroratus Say. Comp Biochem Physiol 22:651–663Google Scholar
  14. Heitler WJ, Burrows M (1977) The locust jump: I. The motor programme. J Exp Biol 66:203–219Google Scholar
  15. Hofmann T, Koch UT (1985) Acceleration receptors in the femoral chordotonal organ in the stick insect Cuniculina impigra. J Exp Biol 114:225–237Google Scholar
  16. Hofmann T, Koch UT, Bassler U (1985) Physiology of the femoral chordotonal organ in the stick insect Cuniculina impigra. J Exp Biol 114:207–223Google Scholar
  17. Matheson T, Field LH (in press) Innervation of the metothoracic femoral chordontal organ of Locusta migratoria. Cell Tissue ResGoogle Scholar
  18. Orchard I (1975) The structure and properties of an abdominal chordotonal organ in Carausius morosus and Blaberus discoidalis. J Insect Physiol 21:1491–1499Google Scholar
  19. Taylor RC (1975) Physical and physiological properties of the crayfish antennal flagellum. J Neurobiol 6:501–519Google Scholar
  20. Theophilidis G (1986) The femoral chordotonal organs of Decticus albifrons (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). II. Function. Comp Biochem Physiol 84A:537–543Google Scholar
  21. Usherwood PNR, Runion HI, Campbell JI (1968) Structure and physiology of a chordotonal organ in the locust leg. J Exp Biol 48:305–323Google Scholar
  22. Weiland G, Koch UT (1987) Sensory feedback during active movements of stick insects. J Exp Biol 133:137–156Google Scholar
  23. Wiersma CAG, Boettiger EG (1959) Unidirectional movement fibres from a proprioceptive organ of the crab, Carcinus maenas. J Exp Biol 36:102–112Google Scholar
  24. Zill SN (1985a) Plasticity and proprioception in the insects. I. Responses and cellular properties of individual receptors of the locust metathoracic femoral chordotonal organ. J Exp Biol 116:435–461Google Scholar
  25. Zill SN (1985b) Plasticity and proprioception in the insects. II. Modes of reflex action of the locust metathoracic femoral chordotonal organ. J Exp Biol 116:463–480Google Scholar
  26. Zill SN (1987) Selective mechanical stimulation of an identified proprioreceptor in freely moving locusts: role of resistance reflexes in active posture. Brain Res 417:195–198Google Scholar
  27. Zill SN, Jepson-Innes K (1988) Evolutionary adaptation of a reflex system: sensory hysteresis counters muscle ‘catch’ tension. J Comp Physiol A 164:43–48Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Matheson
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoology DepartmentUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations