Anatomy and Embryology

, Volume 189, Issue 5, pp 375–381 | Cite as

Deciduous enamel defects in low-birth-weight children: correlated X-ray microtomographic and backscattered electron imaging study of hypoplasia and hypomineralization

  • J. M. Fearne
  • J. C. Elliott
  • F. S. L. Wong
  • G. R. Davis
  • A. Boyde
  • S. J. Jones
Original Articles

Abstract

Enamel does not remodel, and disturbances occurring during development may remain in the tooth as a permanent record of the upset. Mineralization in prenatal and postnatal deciduous enamel was studied in the shed deciduous incisors of low-birth-weight (LBW: < 2kg) children. The specific objective was to gain further insight into the mechanism of formation of developmental defects of enamel. Sections at a resolution of 22–40 μm were reconstructed using X-ray microtomography (μCT) giving absolute measurements of linear absorption coefficient for AgKα radiation. Detail to ca. 1 μm resolution was obtained using automated, digital backscattered electron (BSE) imaging of PMMA-embedded material. Matching the histograms of BSE and μCT images made possible the calibration of the mean atomic number-dependent signal in the BSE images. The comparison of abnormal, affected enamel regions and post-recovery, normal, unaffected regions could be made in the same teeth, since these zones were easily recognized from the distribution of hypoplasia and hypomineralization. The μCT values, converted to calculated mineral densities, ranged from 2.3 g cm-3 to 2.6 g cm-3 in LBW hypoplastic, and between 2.65 and 2.78 g cm-3 in control primary enamel and post-defect, post-natal LBW enamel. Hypoplasia with or without minimal hypomineralization indicated recovery of the ameloblasts in the maturation phase. Disturbance during late matrix formation and early maturation resulted in hypoplasia and hypomineralization.

Key words

Enamel hypoplasia Hypomineralization Low birth weight Backscattered electron imaging X-ray microtomography 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boyde A, Howell PGT, Bromage TG, Elliott JC, Riggs CM, Bell LS, Kneissel M, Reid SA, Jayasinghe JAP, Jones SJ (1992) Applications of mineral quantitation of bone by histogram analysis of backscattered electron images. In: Slavkin H, Price P (eds) Chemistry and biology of mineralized tissues. Elsevier Exerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 47–60Google Scholar
  2. Elliott JC, Anderson P, Boakes R, Dover SD (1989) Scanning X-ray microradiography and microtomography of calcified tissues. In: Hukins DWL (ed) Calcified tissues. Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 41–63Google Scholar
  3. Fearne JM, Brook AH (1993) Small primary tooth-crown size in low birthweight children. Early Hum Dev 33:81–90Google Scholar
  4. Fearne JM, Bryan EM, Elliman AM, Brook AH, Williams DM (1990) Enamel defects in the primary dentition of children born weighing less than 2,000 g. Br Dent J 168:433–437Google Scholar
  5. Macgillavry CH, Rieck GD (eds) (1962) International tables for X-ray crystallography, vol III. Kynoch Press, BirminghamGoogle Scholar
  6. Suckling GW, Elliott DC, Thurley DC (1983) The production of developmental defects of enamel in the incisor teeth of penned sheep resulting from induced parasitism. Arch Oral Biol 28:393–399Google Scholar
  7. Suga S (1982) Progressive mineralization pattern of developing enamel during the maturation stage. J Dent Res 61 (Special issue):1532–1542Google Scholar
  8. Weidmann JA, Weatherall SM, Hamm SM (1967) Variations in enamel density in sections of human teeth. Arch Oral Biol 12:85–87Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Fearne
    • 1
  • J. C. Elliott
    • 1
  • F. S. L. Wong
    • 1
  • G. R. Davis
    • 1
  • A. Boyde
    • 2
  • S. J. Jones
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Child Dental HealthThe London Hospital Medical CollegeLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Anatomy and Developmental BiologyUniversity College LondonUK

Personalised recommendations