Journal of Paleolimnology

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 241–248

Factors affecting the interpretation of caddisfly assemblages from Quaternary sediments

  • Nancy E. Williams
Article

Abstract

The use of assemblages of caddisflies (Trichoptera) in paleoecology has been explored over the past ca. 12 years. During this time, sites in North America, Great Britain and Europe have been studied and progress has been made in both the mechanics of identification and in the understanding of factors relevant to the interpretation of assemblages of this wholly aquatic group. Quaternary caddisfly fossils are abundant and usually well-preserved in waterlaid sediments. Individual larval sclerites can be identified by reference to shapes, textures, colour patterns muscle scar patterns and setal distributions. The flat frontoclypeus is particularly easily identified.

Study of the biological and distributional data relevant to a caddisfly assemblage yields information at two levels. First the probable local habitat and second the climate can be described. This information is derived from both modern collections and the literature as the morphology of species, and hence it is assumed their environmental requirements, have not changed during the Quaternary. Comparisons with fossil assemblages of other plant and animal groups suggest that there are important factors to be considered in interpreting caddisfly assemblages, particularly those from sediments deposited during cold periods: for example, caddisflies may be slower to migrate than certain terrestrial insects, in particular the beetles (Coleoptera), and some glacial assemblages may therefore be dominated by ‘hangers on’. Lotic and lentic species also may migrate at different rates.

Although caddisflies have not yet been fully exploited as paleoecological indicators, they have already contributed to our understanding of past environments and warrant much greater use.

Key words

paleoecology Quaternary Trichoptera 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barton, D. R. & H. B. N.Hynes, 1978. The wave-zone macrobenthos of the exposed Canadian shores of the St. Lawrence Great Lakes. J. Great Lakes Res. 4: 27–45.Google Scholar
  2. Briggs, D. J., G. R.Coope & D. D.Gilbertson, 1985. The chronology and environmental framework of early man in the Upper Thames Valley. Brit. Archaeol. Rep. 15: 1–176.Google Scholar
  3. Coope, G. R., 1977. Fossil coleopteran assemblages as sensitive indicators of climatic changes during the Devensian (last) cold stage. Phil. Trans. r. Soc. Lond. B, 280: 313–340.Google Scholar
  4. Duthie, H. C. & R. G.Mannada Rani, 1967. Diatom assemblages from Pleistocene interglacial beds at Toronto, Ontario. Can. J. Bot. 45: 2249–2261.Google Scholar
  5. Elias, S. A. & B.Wilkinson, 1983. Lateglacial insect fossil assemblages from Lobsigensee, Swiss Plateau. Studies in the Late Quaternary of Lobsigensee 3. Rev. Paleobiol. 2: 89–204.Google Scholar
  6. Elias, S. A. & N. E. Williams, in prep. Quaternary insect fossils from southern Alaska.Google Scholar
  7. Lehmkuhl, D. M. & C. D.Kerst, 1979. Zoogeographical affinities and identification of central arctic caddisflies (Trichoptera). Musk Ox 25: 12–28.Google Scholar
  8. Malicky, H., 1984. The distribution of Hydropsyche guttata Pictet and H. bulgaromanorum Malicky (Trichoptera Hydropsychidae), with notes on their bionomics. Entomologist's Gaz. 35: 257–264.Google Scholar
  9. Otto, C., 1982. Habitat, size and distribution of Scandinavian limnephilid caddisflies. Oikos 38: 355–360.Google Scholar
  10. Resh, V.H. & J.D.Unzicker, 1975. Water quality monitoring and aquatic organisms: the importance of species identification. J. Wat. Pollut. Cont. Fed. 47: 9–19.Google Scholar
  11. Ross, H. H., 1963. Stream communities and terrestrial biomes. Arch. Hydrobiol. 59: 235–242.Google Scholar
  12. Schefter, P. W. & G. B. Wiggins, 1986. A systematic study of the Nearctic larvae of the Hydropsyche morosa group (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae). Life Sci. Misc. Publ., Roy. Ont. Mus.: 1–94.Google Scholar
  13. Terasmae, J., 1960. A palynological study of Pleistocene interglacial beds at Toronto, Ontario. Geol. Surv. Canada Bull. 56: 23–40.Google Scholar
  14. Wiggins, G. B., 1977. Larvae of the North American Caddisfly Genera (Trichoptera). Univ. Toronto Press, Toronto. 1–401.Google Scholar
  15. Wiggins, G. B., 1978. Trichoptera. In: R. W. Merritt & K. W. Cummins, (eds.), An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. Kendall/Hunt Publ. Co, Dubuque, Iowa: 147–185.Google Scholar
  16. Wilkinson, B., 1981. Quaternary sub-fossil Trichoptera larvae from a site in the English Lake District. In G. P. Moretti (ed.), Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. Trichoptera, Junk, The Hague: 409–419.Google Scholar
  17. Wilkinson, B., 1984. Interpretation of past environments from sub-fossil caddis larvae. In J. C. Morse (ed.), Proc. 4th Int. Symp. Trichoptera, Junk, The Hague: 447–452.Google Scholar
  18. Wilkinson, B., 1987. Trichoptera sub-fossils from temperate running water sediments. in M. Bournaud & H. Tachet (eds.), Proc. 5th Int. Symp. Trichoptera, Junk, The Hague: 61–66.Google Scholar
  19. Williams, N. E., 1987. Caddisflies and quaternary palaeoecology—what have we learned so far? In M. Bournaud & H. Tachet (eds.), Proc. 5th Int. Symp. Trichoptera, Junk, The Hague: 57–60.Google Scholar
  20. Williams, N. E., 1988. The use of caddisflies (Trichoptera) in palaeoecology. Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 62: 493–500.Google Scholar
  21. Williams, N. E. & A. V. Morgan, 1977. Fossil caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera) from the Don Formation, Toronto, Ontario, and their use in paleoecology. Can. J. Zool. 55: 519–527.Google Scholar
  22. Williams, N. E. & A. V. Morgan, in prep. Late Pleistocene and Holocene caddisfly assemblages (Insecta: Trichoptera) from eastern North America.Google Scholar
  23. Williams, N. E., J. A. Westgate, D. D. Williams, A. Morgan & A. V. Morgan, 1981. Invertebrate fossils (Insecta: Trichoptera, Diptera, Coleoptera) from the Pleistocene Scarborough formation at Toronto, Ontario, and their palaeoenvironmental significance. Quat. Res. 16: 146–166.Google Scholar
  24. Williams, N. E. & G. B. Wiggins, 1981. A proposed setal nomenclature and homology for larval Trichoptera. In G. P. Moretti (ed.), Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. Trichoptera, Junk, The Hague: 421–429.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy E. Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Life SciencesUniversity of TorontoScarboroughCanada

Personalised recommendations