Focal malignant liver lesions: diagnosis by dynamic incremental CT, early phase
- 68 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
The purpose of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of dynamic incremental bolus-enhanced conventional CT (DICT) with intravenous contrast administration, early phase, in the diagnosis of malignancy of focal liver lesions. A total of 122 lesions were selected in 74 patients considering the following criteria: lesion diameter 10 mm or more, number of lesions less than six per study, except in multiple angiomatosis and the existence of a valid criteria of definitive diagnosis. Lesions were categorized into seven levels of diagnostic confidence of malignancy compared with the definitive diagnosis for acquisition of a receiver-operator-characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the technique. Forty-six and 70 lesions were correctly diagnosed as malignant and benign, respectively; there were 2 false-positive and 4 false-negative diagnoses of malignancy and the sensitivity and specificity obtained were 92 and 97 %. The DICT early phase was confirmed as a highly accurate method in the characterization and diagnosis of malignancy of focal liver lesions, requiring an optimal technical performance and judicious analysis of existing semiological data.
Key words
Focal liver lesions Conventional CT Liver CT protocolPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Reinig JW (1991) Differentiation of hepatic lesions with MR imaging: the last word? Radiology 179: 601–602Google Scholar
- 2.Vellet AD (1991) MRI minisymposium, part II. Characterization of intrahepatic space-occupying lesions by magnetic resonance imaging. Can Assoc Radiol J 42 (3) 165–179Google Scholar
- 3.Lange E de, Mugler J III, Bosworth J et al. (1994) MR imaging of the liver: breath-hold T1-weighted MP-GRE compared with conventional T2-weighted SE imaging — lesion detection, localization and characterization. Radiology 190: 727–736Google Scholar
- 4.Bluemke D, Fishman E (1993) Spiral CT of the liver. AJR 160: 787–792Google Scholar
- 5.Ferrucci JT (1994) Liver tumor imaging. In: Thompson W (ed) Current concepts in staging neoplasms. Radiol Clin North Am 32: 39–54Google Scholar
- 6.Heiken JP, Weyman PJ, Lee JKT et al. (1989) Detection of focal hepatic masses: prospective evaluation with CT, delayed CT, CT during arterial portography and MR imaging. Radiology 171: 47–51Google Scholar
- 7.Vock P, Jung HI, Kalender WA (1989) Single breath-hold volumetric CT of the hepatobiliary system (abstract). Radiology 173 (P): 377Google Scholar
- 8.Wernecke K, Rummeny E, Bongartz G, Vassallo P, Kivelitz D, Weismann W et al. (1990) Detection of hepatic masses in patients with carcinoma: comparative Sensitivities of sonography, CT, and MR imaging. AJR 157: 731–739Google Scholar
- 9.Baron R (1994) Understanding and optimizing use of contrast material for CT of the Liver. AJR 163: 323–331Google Scholar
- 10.Freeny P, Marks W (1986) Patterns of contrast enhancement of benign and malignant hepatic neoplasms during bolus dynamic and delayed CT. Radiology 160: 613–618Google Scholar
- 11.Bressler EL, Alpern MB, Glazer GM, Francis IR, Ensminger WD (1987) Hypervascular hepatic metastases: CT evaluation. Radiology 162: 49–51Google Scholar
- 12.DuBrow RA, David CL, Libshitz HI et al. (1990) Detection of hepatic metastases in breast cancer: the role of non-enhanced and enhanced CT scanning. J Comput Assist Tomogr 14: 366–369Google Scholar
- 13.Miketic LM (1993) Are contrast-enhanced scans necessary? AJR 161: 984Google Scholar
- 14.Bernardino ME, Erwin BC, Steinberg HV, Baumgartner BR, Torres WE, Gedgaudas-McClees RK (1986) Delayed hepatic CT scanning: increased confidence and improved detection of hepatic metastases. Radiology 159: 71–74Google Scholar
- 15.Metz CE (1986) ROC methodology in radiology imaging. Invest Radiol 21: 720–723PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Sugarbaker PH (1990) Surgical decision making for large bowel cancer metastatic to the liver. Radiology 174: 621–626Google Scholar
- 17.Okuda K, Ryu M, Tobe T (1987) Surgical management of hepatoma: the Japanese experience. In: Waneb HJ (ed) Hepatic and biliary cancer. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 219–238Google Scholar
- 18.Honda H, Matsuura Y, Onitsuka H et al. (1992) Differential diagnosis of hepatic tumors (hepatoma, hemangiona and metastasis) with CT — value of two phase incremental imaging. AJR 159: 735–740PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Jones E, Chezmar J, Nelson R, Bernardino M (1992) The frequency and significance of small ( «15 mm) hepatic lesions detected by CT. AJR 158: 535–539Google Scholar
- 20.Wegener OH (1992) Body computed tomography. Blackwell Publications, BostonGoogle Scholar
- 21.Leslie D, Johnson CD, Johnson CM, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen W (1995) Distinction between cavernous hemangiomas of the liver and hepatic metastases on CT. Value of contrast enhancement patterns. AJR 164: 625–629Google Scholar
- 22.Quinn SF, Benjamin GG (1992) Hepatic cavernous hemangiomas: simple diagnostic sign with dynamic bolus CT. Radiology 182: 545–548PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Gaa J, Sanjay S, Ferrucci JT (1991) Perfusion characteristics of hepatic cavernous hemangiomas using intravenous CT angiography (IVCTA). Eur J Radiol 12: 228–233Google Scholar
- 24.Halvorsen R, Korobkin M, Foster W, Silverman P, Thompson W (1984) The variable CT appearance of hepatic abscesses. AJR 141: 941–946Google Scholar
- 25.Lee J, Sagel S, Stanley R (1989) Computed body tomography with MRI correlation. Raven Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 26.Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Kanazawa S, Charnsangavej C, Wallace S (1992) Hilar cholangiocarcinoma, an evaluation of subtypes with CT and angiography. Acta Radiol 33: 351–355PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Takayasu K, Ikeya S, Mukai K, Muramatsu Y, Makuchi M, Kasegawa H (1990) CT of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: late contrast enhancement in six patients. AJR 150: 1203–1206Google Scholar
- 28.Brick SH, Hill MC, Lande IM (1987) The mistaken or indeterminate CT diagnosis of hepatic metastases: The value of sonography. AJR 148: 723–726Google Scholar