Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 129–133 | Cite as

Primary staging of urinary bladder carcinoma: the role of MRI and a comparison with CT

  • J. O. Barentsz
  • G. J. Jager
  • J. A. Witjes
  • J. H. J. Ruijs
Oncology Imaging Review Article

Abstract

Since the introduction, pelvic MRI has been considered the best non-invasive technique for primary staging of urinary bladder cancer. Before using MRI an understanding of normal and pathological MR images of the urinary bladder is essential. This review therefore describes the MR anatomy of the urinary bladder as well as the appearances of carcinoma. MRI plays an important clinical role in staging the primary tumour. In superficial tumours, clinical staging, which includes transurethral biopsy, is the best technique. For invasive tumours, MRI is superior to other techniques such as CT scanning, transvesical ultrasonography and clinical staging. A limitation of both MRI and CT scanning is their inability to recognize minimal tumour growth in the muscle layer of the bladder wall, or to differentiate between post-transurethral resection oedema and tumour. Therefore, in all patients with urinary bladder cancer staging should preferably start with MRI followed by clinical staging. Unfortunately, however, because of the high cost of this strategy, MRI has to be reserved for staging deeply invasive and superficial poorly differentiated tumours.

Key words

MRI Staging Urinary bladder cancer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jewett HJ (1973) Cancer of the bladder. Cancer 32: 1072–1075Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fisher MR, Hricak H, Tanagho EA (1985) Urinary bladder MR imaging. II. Neoplasm. Radiology 157: 471–477Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beyer HK, Funke PJ, Brackins-Romero J, Ühlenbrock D (1985) Wertigkeit der Kernspintomographie bei der Diagnostik und Stadienbestimmung von Harnblasenneoplasmen. Digit Bilddiagnost 5: 167–172Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amendola MA, Glaser GM, Grossman HB, et al (1986) Staging of bladder carcinoma: MRI-CT-surgical correlation. AJR 146: 1179–1183Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Küper K, Koelbel G, Schmeidl U (1986) Kernspintomographische Untersuchungen von Harnblasenkarzinomen bei 1.5 Tesla. Fortschr Rontgenstr 144: 674–680Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bryan PJ, Butler HE, LiPuma JP, et al (1987) CT and MR imaging in staging bladder neoplasms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 11: 96–101Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rholl KS, Lee JKT, Heiken JP, et al (1987) Primary bladder carcinoma: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 163: 117–123Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nicolas V, Harder T, Steudel A, et al (1988) Die Wertigkeit bildgebender Verfahren bei der Diagnostik und dem Staging von Harnblasentumoren. Fortschr Rontgenstr 148: 234–239Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buy JN, Moss AA, Guinet C, et al (1988) MR staging of bladder carcinoma: correlation with pathologic findings. Radiology 169: 695–700Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koebel G, Schmeidl U, Griebel J, et al (1988) MR imaging of urinary bladder neoplasms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 12: 98–103Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Husband JE, Olliff JF, Williams MP, Heron CW, Cherryman GR (1989) Bladder cancer: staging with CT and MR imaging. Radiology 173: 435–440Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barentsz JO, Debruyne FMJ, Ruijs SHJ (1990) Magnetic resonance imaging of carcinoma of the urinary bladder Kluwer DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tavares NJ, Demas BE, Hricak H (1990) MR imaging of bladder neoplasms: correlation with pathologic staging. Urol Radiol 12: 27–33Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tachibana M, Baba S, Deguchi N, et al (1991) Efficacy of gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiation between superficial and muscle-invasive tumor of the bladder: a comparative study with computerized tomography and transurethral ultrasonography. J Urol 145: 1169–1173Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim B, Semelka RC, Ascher SM, Chalpin DB, Carrol PR, Hricak H (1994) Bladder tumor staging: comparison of contrast enhanced CT, T1-and T2-weighted MR imaging, dynamic gadolinium-enhanced imaging, and late gadolinium-enhanced imaging. Radiology 193: 239–245Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barentsz JO, Jager GJ, Mugler JP III, Oosterhof G, Peters H, van Erning LThJO, Ruijs SHJ (1995) Staging urinary bladder cancer: value of T1-weighted 3D MP-RAGE and 2D SE sequences. AJR 164: 109–115Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bryan BJ, Butler HE, LiPuma JP, et al (1983) NMR scanning of the pelvis: initial experience with a 0.3 T system. AJR 141: 1111–1118Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heiken JP, Lee JKT (1988) MR imaging of the pelvis. Radiology 166: 11–16Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hricak H, Williams RD, Spring DB, et al (1983) Anatomy and pathology of the male pelvis by magnetic resonance imaging. AJR 141: 1101–1110Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hricak H, Alpers C, Crooks LE, Sheldon PE (1983) Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: initial experience. AJR 141: 1119–1128Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Narumi Y, Inoue E, Katoda T, et al (1991) MR imaging of the bladder wall: in vitro histopathologic correlation. Radiology 181: 97Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harmer MH (1978) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 3rd. edn. Union Internationale Contre le Cancer, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marshall VF (1952) The relation of the pre-operative estimate to pathologic demonstration of the extent of vesical neoplasms. J Urol 68: 714–719Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bartels KD, Dettmar H, Goeckel B (1983) Die Bedeutung der Computertomographie bei der Stadieneinteilung der Harnblasentumoren. Urologe 22: 342–346Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jäger N, Radeke HW, Adolphs HD, et al (1986) Value of intravesical sonography in tumor classification of bladder carcinoma. Eur Urol 12: 76–84Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lang EK (1969) The röntgenographic assessment of bladder tumors. Cancer 23: 717–724Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Murphy GP (1978) Developments in preoperative staging of bladder tumors. Urology 11: 109–115Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wasjman Z, Baumgarter G, Murphy GP, Merrin C (1975) Evaluation of lymphangiography for clinical staging of bladder tumors. J Urol 114: 712–714Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Whitmore WF, Batata MA, Ghoneim MA, Grabstald H, Unal A (1977) Radical cystectomy with or without prior irradiation in the treatment of bladder cancer. J Urol 118: 184–187Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barentsz JO, Lemmens JAM, Rujis SHJ, et al (1988) Carcinoma of the urinary bladder: MR imaging using a double surface coil. AJR 151: 107–112Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Siedelmann FE, Cohen WN, Bryan PJ (1977) Computed tomographic staging of bladder neoplasms. Radiol Clin North Am 15: 419–440Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Siedelmann FE, Cohen WN, Bryan PJ, et al. (1978) Accuracy of CT staging of bladder neoplasms using the gas-filled method: report of 21 patients with surgical confirmation. AJR 130: 735–739Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yu WS, Sagerman RH, King GA, et al (1979) The value of computed tomography in the management of bladder cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 5: 135–142Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kellet MJ, Oliver RTD, Husband JE, Fry IK (1980) Computed tomography as an adjunct to bimanual examination for staging bladder tumors. Br J Urol 52: 101–106Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Frödin L, Hemmingson A, Johansson A, Wicklund H (1980) Computed tomography in staging of bladder carcinoma. Acta Radiol Diagn 21: 763–767Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Koss JC, Arger PH, Coleman BG (1981) CT staging of bladder cancer. AJR 137: 359–362Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lee JKT, Stanley RJ, Sagel SS, McClennan BL (1978) Accuracy of CT in detecting intra-abdominal and pelvic lymph node metastases from pelvic cancers. AJR 131: 675–681Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Morgan CL, Phil M, Calkins RF, Cavalcanti EJ (1981) Computed tomography in the evaluation, staging and therapy of carcinoma of the bladder and prostate. Radiology 140: 751–761PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ahlberg NE, Calissendorff B, Wijkström H (1982) Computed tomography in staging of bladder carcinoma. Acta Radiol Diagn 23: 47–53Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vock P, Haertel M, Fuchs WA, et al (1982) Computed tomography in staging carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Br J Radiol 54: 158–163Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Weinerman PM, Arger PH, Pollack HM (1982) CT evaluation of bladder and prostate neoplasms. Urol Radiol 4: 105–114Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Greiner KG, Jacob F, Klose KC, Schwartz R (1983) Sicherung der T-Klassifikation von Harnblasentumoren durch transkutane Sonographie, intravesikale Sonographie und Computertomographie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 139: 510–515Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sager EM, Talle K, Fossa S, et al (1983) The role of CT in demonstrating perivesical tumor growth in the preoperative staging of carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Radiology 146: 443–446Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Engelmann U, Schild H, Klose K, et al (1984) Die Treffsicherheit der Computertomographie beim Harnblasenkarzinom. Urologe 23: 161–166Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Salo JO, Kivisaari L, Lehtonen T (1985) CT in determining the depth of infiltration of bladder tumors. Urol Radiol 7: 88–93Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Doringer E, Joos H, Forstner R, Schmoller H (1991) MRI of bladder carcinoma: tumor staging and gadolinium contrast behaviour. Fortschr Rontgenstr 154: 357–363Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sohn M, Neuerburg JM, Teufl F, Bohndorf K (1990) Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of urinary bladder neoplasms. Urol Int 45: 142–147Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sparenberg A, Hamm B, Hammerer P, Samberger V, Wolf KJ (1991) The diagnosis of bladder carcinomas by NMR tomography: an improvement with Gd-DTPA? Fortschr Rontgenstr 155: 117–122Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Neuerburg JM, Bohndorf K, Sohn M, Teufl F, Guenther RW, Daus HJ (1989) Urinary bladder neoplasms: evaluation with contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 172: 739–743Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. O. Barentsz
    • 1
  • G. J. Jager
    • 1
  • J. A. Witjes
    • 2
  • J. H. J. Ruijs
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity Hospital NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of UrologyUniversity Hospital NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations