Public Choice

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 101–116 | Cite as

The effects of constitutional restraints on governmental spending

  • Burton A. Abrams
  • William R. Dougan


Public Finance Governmental Spending Constitutional Restraint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (1982). Tax capacity of the fifty states: Methodology and estimates. Washington, D.C.: Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, March.Google Scholar
  2. Bails, D. (1982). A critique of the effectiveness of tax-expenditure limitations. Public Choice 38 (2): 129–138.Google Scholar
  3. Barro, R.J. (1979). On the determination of the public debt. Journal of Political Economy 87 (October): 940–971.Google Scholar
  4. Barro, R.J., and Gordon, D.B. (1983). A positive theory of monetary policy in a natural rate model. Journal of Political Economy 91 (August): 589–610.Google Scholar
  5. Buchanan, J.M., and Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  6. Buchanan, J.M., and Wagner, R. (1977). Democracy in deficit. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Caves, R.E. (1962). Air transport and its regulators. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Council of State Governments (1982). Book of the states, 1982–83, Vol. 24, Lexington, Ky.: Council of State Governments.Google Scholar
  9. Courant, P.N., Gramlich, E.M., and Rubinfeld, D.L. (1979). The stimulative effects of intergovernmental grants, or why money sticks where it hits. In P. Mieszkowski and W.H. Oakland (Eds.), Fiscal federalism and grants-in-aid. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Dougan, W.R., and Kenyon, D.A. (1984). Pressure groups and public expenditures: The flypaper effect reconsidered. Unpublished manuscript, Dartmouth College, November.Google Scholar
  11. Fisher, R.C. (1982). Income and grant effects on local expenditure: The flypaper effect and other difficulties. Journal of Urban Economics 12 (November): 324–345.Google Scholar
  12. Friedman, M., and Friedman, R.D. (1979). Free to choose. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  13. Inman, R.P. (1979). The fiscal performance of local governments: An interpretive review. In P. Mieszkowski and M. Straszheim (Eds.), Current issues in urban economics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kalt, J.P. (1981). The economics and politics of oil price regulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kalt, J.P., and Zupan, M.A. (1984). Capture and ideology in the economic theory of politics. American Economic Review 74 (June): 279–300.Google Scholar
  16. Kau, J.B., and Rubin, P.H. (1982). Congressmen, constituents, and contributors. Boston: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  17. Kolko, G. (1965). Railroads and regulation, 1877–1916. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kydland, F.E., and Prescott, E.C. (1977). Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy 85 (June): 473–491.Google Scholar
  19. Lavergne, R.P. (1983). The political economy of U.S. tariffs: An empirical analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lovell, M.C. (1978). Spending for education: The exercise of public choice. Review of Economics and Statistics 60 (November): 487–495.Google Scholar
  21. Maloney, M.T., McCormick, R.E., and Tollison, R.D. (1984). Economic regulation, competitive governments, and specialized resources. Journal of Law and Economics 27 (October): 329–338.Google Scholar
  22. Marvel, H.P., and Ray, E.J. (1983). The Kennedy Round: Evidence on the regulation of international trade in the United States. American Economic Review 73 (March): 190–197.Google Scholar
  23. Moore, T.G. (1978). The beneficiaries of trucking regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 21 (October): 327–343.Google Scholar
  24. Osman, J.W. (1966). The dual impact of federal aid on state and local government expenditures. National Tax Journal 19 (December): 362–372.Google Scholar
  25. Patterson, S.C., and Caldeira, G.A. (1984). The etiology of partisan competition. The American Political Science Review 78 (September): 691–706.Google Scholar
  26. Peltzman, S. (1984). Constituent interest and congressional voting. Journal of Law and Economics 27 (April): 181–210.Google Scholar
  27. Pogue, T.F., and Sgontz, L.G. (1968). The effects of grants-in-aid on state-local spending. National Tax Journal 21 (June): 190–199.Google Scholar
  28. Stigler, G.J. (1964). Public regulation of the securities markets. Journal of Business 37 (October).Google Scholar
  29. Stigler, G.J., and Friedland, C. (1962). What can regulators regulate? The case of electricity. Journal of Law and Economics 5 (October): 1–16.Google Scholar
  30. Toma, M. (1982). Inflationary bias of the federal reserve system: A bureaucratic perspective. Journal of Monetary Economics 10 (September): 163–190.Google Scholar
  31. Tullock, G. (1965). Entry barriers in politics. American Economic Review 55 (May): 458–466.Google Scholar
  32. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census (1983). 1980 Census of population, Volume 1: Characteristics of the population. Washington, D.C.: U.S.G.P.O.Google Scholar
  33. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census (1981). Governmental finances in 1979–80. Washington, D.C.: U.S.G.P.O.Google Scholar
  34. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census (1982). State government finances in 1981. Washington, D.C.: U.S.G.P.O.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Burton A. Abrams
    • 1
    • 2
  • William R. Dougan
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.University of DelawareUSA
  2. 2.Federal Trade CommissionUSA
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsDartmouth CollegeHanover
  4. 4.Federal Trade CommissionUSA

Personalised recommendations