Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 474–479 | Cite as

Covalent immobilization of laccase on activated carbon for phenolic effluent treatment

  • Susan Davis
  • Richard G. Burns
Biochemical Engineering

Summary

Laccase was covalently immobilised to activated carbon using four derivatisation methods. The highest bound activity was obtained using diimide coupling of laccase to carboxyl groups on the carbon. The maximum bound activity was reached at 11.5 mg laccase/g carbon. The carbon-immobilised laccase (CIL) was stable at pH values from 4.0 to 9.0. CIL stored at 4°C lost 38± 5% activity in the first 4 days, then a further 22±5% in 126 days. CIL showed increased stability to low pH although the pH optimum was unchanged. The activation energy of CIL was lower than soluble laccase. Oxidation of 2,6-dimethoxyphenol (DMP) by CIL in a packed-bed system was only 30±10% of that in a fluidised bed system. Of the initial activity 10–30% was retained after oxidation of seven batches of DMP. CIL removed colour from two industrial effluents. Colour was removed from pulp mill bleach plant effluent at 115 colour units per enzyme unit per hour and the removal rate increased with increasing effluent concentration.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberti BN, Klibanov AM (1981) Enzymatic removal of dissolved aromatics from industrial aqueous effluents. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp 11:373–379Google Scholar
  2. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheetham PSJ (1985) Principles of industrial enzymology: basis of utilization of soluble and immobilised enzymes in industrial processes. In: Wiseman A (ed) Handbook of enzyme technology. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK, pp 54–146Google Scholar
  4. Chen HT, Fredrickson EE, Cormack JF, Young SR (1974) Four biological systems for treating intregrated paper mill effluent. TAPPI 57:111–115Google Scholar
  5. Cho YK, Bailey JE (1978) Immobilization of enzymes on activated carbon: properties of immobilised glucoamylase, glucose oxidase and gluconolactonase. Biotechnol Bioeng 20:1651–1665Google Scholar
  6. Cho YK, Bailey JE (1979) Immobilization of enzymes on activated carbon: selection and preparation of the carbon support. Biotechnol Bioeng 21:461–476Google Scholar
  7. Davis S, Burns RG (1990) Decolorization of phenolic effluents by soluble and immobilised phenol oxidases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 32:721–726Google Scholar
  8. Deloggio TJ, Graves DJ (1988) An immobilized hydrogenase from Alcaligenes eutrophus H-16. Biotechnol Bioeng 32:295–300Google Scholar
  9. Eriksson K-E, Kirk TK (1986) Biopulping, biobleaching and treatment of kraft bleaching effluents with white-rot fungi. In: Robinson CW (ed) Comprehensive biotechnology, vol 3. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 271–294Google Scholar
  10. Fahreus G, Reinhammar B (1967) Large scale production and purification of laccase from cultures of the fungus Polyporus versicolor and some properties of the laccase A. Acta Chem Scand 21:2367–2378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Forss K, Jokinen K, Savolainen M, Williamson H (1987) Utilization of enzymes for effluent treatment in the pulp and paper industry. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Wood and Pulping Chemistry, vol I, Paris, France, 1987. pp 179–183Google Scholar
  12. Froehner SC, Eriksson K-E (1975) Properties of the glycoprotein laccase immobilised by two methods. Acta Chem Scand B 29:691–694Google Scholar
  13. Harrington BT, Albert RJ (1989) Water quality. New colour abatement strategies include end-of-pipe treatment. Pulp Paper 63:119–122Google Scholar
  14. Hartmeier W (1986) Immobilized biocatalysts: an introduction. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Kennedy JF, White CA (1985) Data on techniques of enzyme immobilization and bioaffinity procedures. In: Wiseman A (ed) Handbook of enzyme technology. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK, pp 147–243Google Scholar
  16. Kennedy JF, White CA, Melo EHM (1988) The immobilisation of enzymes and cells. Chim Oggi 5:21–29Google Scholar
  17. Kringstad KP, Lindstrom K (1984) Spent liquors form pulp bleaching. Environ Sci Technol 18:236A–248AGoogle Scholar
  18. Leonowicz A, Sarkar JM, Bollag J-M (1988) Improvement in the stability and reusability of a fungal laccase by immobilisation on porous glass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 29:129–135Google Scholar
  19. Peyton TO (1984) Biological disposal of hazardous waste. Enzyme Microb Technol 6:146–154Google Scholar
  20. Pye EK, Chance B (1976) Investigation of the physical properties of immobilised enzymes. Methods enzymol 44:357–372Google Scholar
  21. Shuttleworth KL, Bollag J-M (1986) Soluble and immobilised laccase as catalysts for the transformation of substituted phenols. Enzyme Microb Technol 8:171–177Google Scholar
  22. Weetall HH (1976) Covalent coupling methods for inorganic support materials. Methods Enzymol 44:134–148Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Davis
    • 1
  • Richard G. Burns
    • 1
  1. 1.Biological LaboratoryUniversity of KentCanterburyUK
  2. 2.Sandoz Chemicals (UK) Ltd.UK

Personalised recommendations