Quality and Quantity

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 35–67 | Cite as

The potential of facet theory for applied social psychology

  • David Canter


Social Psychology Facet Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ambrose, I. and Canter, D. (1979). “The design of total institutions; organisational objectives as evaluation criteria”, paper presented to ICEP, Guildford, July 1979.Google Scholar
  2. Arbuthnot, J. (1977). “The roles of attitudinal and personality variables in the prediction of environmental behaviour and knowledge”, Environment and Behaviour 9: 217–232.Google Scholar
  3. Bartram, D. (1980). “Do you really need your null hypothesis?”, British Psychological Society Bulletin 33: 318–321.Google Scholar
  4. Bloombaum, M. (1970). “Doing smallest space analysis”, Journal of Conflict Resolution 14: 409–416.Google Scholar
  5. Borg, I. (1978). “Some basic concepts of facet theory”, in J.C.Lingoes, ed., Geometric Representations of Relational Data. Ann Arbor, MI: Mathesis.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, J. (1979). “Motives and moving house”, paper presented to ICEP, Guildford, July 1979.Google Scholar
  7. Bynner, J. (1980). “Some problems with psychological research practice”, British Psychological Society Bulletin 33: 315–317.Google Scholar
  8. Canter, D. (1975). Environmental Interaction. London: Surrey University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Canter, D. (1977). Psychology of Place. London: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  10. Canter, D. (1979). “Are there laws of environmental interaction”, paper presented to IAAP Conference, Louvain, 1979.Google Scholar
  11. Canter, D. and Brown, J. (1979). “Explanatory roles”, in C.Antaki, ed., The Psychology of Ordinary Explanations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Canter, D. and Kenny, C. (1979). “Implications for hospital ward design from a multi-dimensional model for user evaluation”, paper presented to ICEP, Guildford, July 1979.Google Scholar
  13. Canter, D. and Lee, K.H. (1974). “A non-reactive study of room usage in modern Japanese apartments”, in D.Canter and T.Lee, eds., Psychology and the Built Environment. Tonbridge, Kent: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  14. Canter, D. and Walker, E. (1980). “Environmental role and perceived housing quality”, Architectural Research Paper, Symposoium on Housing Quality, IAAP, Munich, 31 July 1978.Google Scholar
  15. Canter, D., Kenny, C. and Rees, K. (1980). “A multivariate model for place evaluation”, mimeo, University of Surrey.Google Scholar
  16. Fisher, R.A. (1935). The Design of Experiments. London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
  17. Foa, U.G. (1958). “The contiguity principle in the structure of interpersonal relations”, Human Relations 11: 229–238.Google Scholar
  18. Freedman, J. (1975). Crowding and Behaviour. San Francisco: W.H. Freedman.Google Scholar
  19. Gratch, H. (1973). Twenty-five Years of Social Research in Israel. Jerusalem: Jerusalem Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Groat, L. (1979). “Post-modernism and the multiple sorting task”, paper presented to ICEP, Guildford, July 1979.Google Scholar
  21. Groat, L. and Canter, D. (1979). “Does post-modernism communicate?”, Progressive Architecture 12: 84–87.Google Scholar
  22. Guttman, L. (1954). “A new approach to factor analysis: the radex”, in P.F.Lazarsfeld, ed., Mathematical Thinking in the Social Sciences. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Guttman, L. (1977). “What is not what in statistics”, The Statistician 26: 81–107.Google Scholar
  24. Guttman, L. (1979). “New developments in integrating test design and analysis”, paper presented to the 40th International Conference on Testing Problems, Educational Testing Service, New York, October 1979.Google Scholar
  25. Guttman, R. and Guttman, L. (1974). “Non-metric analysis of genetic relationships among inbred strains of mice”, Systematic Zoology 23: 355–362.Google Scholar
  26. Guttman, L. and Levy, S. (1980). “Two laws for the structure of intelligence”, Behavioural Science Quarterly 25:Google Scholar
  27. Hewitt, J.A. (1979). “The ecology of the home: differences and similarities among families with one, two or three or more children”, M.Sc. Thesis, University of Surrey.Google Scholar
  28. Housing Research Unit (1978). “Descriptive statistics on house buying”, University of Surrey, Guildford.Google Scholar
  29. Jordan, J.E. (1978). “Facet theory and the study of behaviour”, in M.Shyes, ed., Theory construction and Data Analysis in the Social Sciences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  30. Kelly, G.A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  31. Kenny, C. and Canter, D. (1979). “The multivariate structure of design evaluation: a cylindrex of nurses' conceptualizations”, submitted.Google Scholar
  32. Levy, S. (1976). “Use of the mapping sentence for coordinating theory and research”, Quality and Quantity 10: 117–125.Google Scholar
  33. Lingoes, J.C. (1968). “The multivariate analysis of qualitative data”, Multivariate Behaviour Research 3: 61–94.Google Scholar
  34. Lingoes, J.C., ed. (1979). Geometric Representation of Relational Data. Ann Arbor, MI: Mathesis.Google Scholar
  35. Miles, H. and Canter, D. (1976). “Energy conservation in British Universities”, mimeo, University of Surrey.Google Scholar
  36. Mulaik, S.A. (1972). The foundations of Factor Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  37. Pallack, M.L., Cook, D.A. and Sullivan, J.J. (1980). “Commitment and energy conservation”, in L.Bickman, ed., Applied Social Psychology Annual, 1. Beverley Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Payne, R.L., et al. (1976). “Organizational climate and job satisfaction; a conceptual synthesis”, Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance 16: 45–62.Google Scholar
  39. Rees, K. and Canter, D. (1979). “Comparing married couples' satisfaction with their housing environment”, paper presented to ICEP, Guildford, July 1979.Google Scholar
  40. Runkel, P.J. and McGrath, J.E. (1972). Research on Human Behaviour; A Systematic Guide to Method. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.Google Scholar
  41. Saxe, L. and Fine, M. (1980). “Reorienting social psychology toward application: a methodological analysis”, in L.Bickman, ed., Applied Social Psychology Annual, 1. Beverley Hills/London: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Shapira, Z. and Zevelun, E. (1978). “On the use of facet analysis in organizational behaviour research; some conceptual considerations and an example”, Working Paper No. 10–78–79, Graduate School of Administration, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA.Google Scholar
  43. Sherif, M. and Sherif, C. (1969). Social Psychology. New York/Tokyo: Harper and Row/John Weatherhill.Google Scholar
  44. Shye, S., ed. (1978). Theory Construction and Data Analysis in the Behavioural Sciences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  45. Shye, S. and Elizur, D. (1976). “Worries about deprivation of job rewards following computerization; a partial order scalogram analysis”, Human Relations 29: 63–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Stouffer, S.S., Guttman, L., Suchman, E.A., Lazarfeld, P.F., Star, S.A. and Clausen, J.A. (1950). Measurement and Prediction. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Vygotsky, L. (1934). Thought and Language. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Canter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of SurreyGt. Britain

Personalised recommendations