Quality and Quantity

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 1–18 | Cite as

Traces of agreement: On the DOT-product as a coefficient of agreement

  • Roel Popping


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brennan, R.L. and Light, R.J. (1974). “Measuring agreement when two observers classify people into categories not defined in advance”, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 27: 154–163.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, J. (1960). “A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales”, Educational and Psychological Measurement 20: 37–46.Google Scholar
  3. Gifi, A. (1981) Nonlinear Multivariate analysis. Leyden: Department of Data Theory of the Faculty of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  4. Hubert, L.J. (1977). “Nominal scale response agreement as a generalized correlation”, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 30: 98–103.Google Scholar
  5. Lazarsfeld, P.F. and Barton, A.H. (1955). “Some general principles of questionaire classification”, pp. 83–93 in P.F.Lazarsfeld and M.Rosenberg, eds., The Language of Social Research. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Klastorin, T.D. (1980). “Merging groups to maximize object partition comparison”, Psychometrika 45: 425–433.Google Scholar
  7. Kroonenberg, P.M. and Verbeek, A. (1980). “Exact distributions of chi-square-tests in contingency tables with small numbers”, WEP reeks 80-18-EX, Vakgroep Wijsgerige en Empirische Pedagogiek. University of Leyden (Poster session at the 4th COMPSTAT Symposium, Edinburgh, August 1980).Google Scholar
  8. Mokken, R.J. (1971). A theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis, with Applications in Political Research. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  9. Montgommery, A.C. and Crittenden, K.S. (1977). “Improving coding reliability for open-ended questions”, Public Opinion Quarterly 41: 235–243.Google Scholar
  10. Nunnally, J.C. (1967). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Popping, R. (1980). Notitite met Betrekking tot Overeenstemming bij het Analyseren van Open Vragen. (Note on Agreement when Analyzing Open-Ended Questions). Bull. No. 39, Vakgroep Methoden end Technieken, Department of Sociology, Groningen.Google Scholar
  12. Theil, H. (1970). “On the estimation of relationships involving qualitative variables”, American Journal of Sociology 76: 103–154.Google Scholar
  13. Zangwill, W.I. (1969). Nonlinear Programming. A Unified Approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roel Popping
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of GroningenGermany

Personalised recommendations