Advertisement

Psychopharmacology

, Volume 88, Issue 3, pp 310–314 | Cite as

6-Hydroxydopamine lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex fail to influence intravenous self-administration of cocaine

  • M. T. Martin-Iverson
  • C. Szostak
  • H. C. Fibiger
Original Investigations

Abstract

It has been suggested that the initiation and maintenance of cocaine self-administration (SA) is critically dependent on the dopaminergic (DA) projection to the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Evidence for this hypothesis has been obtained from intracranial SA of cocaine, but a role of the mPFC in IV cocaine SA has not been established. The present experiment investigated the effect of destruction of DA-containing terminals in the mPFC on the rate and pattern of IV cocaine SA. Rats were trained to self-administer cocaine during daily 3-h sessions. After stable response patterns were obtained, the rats received either bilateral injections of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) into the mPFC, or sham operations. The lesions did not affect either the rate or pattern of IV cocaine SA, despite producing substantial DA depletions in the mPFC. Thus, the mPFC does not appear to be a critical substrate for the maintenance of IV cocaine SA. The 6-OHDA lesions of the mPFC resulted in an apparent increase in DA turnover in both the striatum and the nucleus accumbens, suggesting that DA terminals in the mPFC may have an inhibitory influence on the activity of subcortical DA projections.

Key words

Cocaine Self-administration Medial prefrontal cortex Dopamine 6-Hydroxydopamine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown ZW, Amit Z, Weeks JR (1976) Simple flow-thru swivel for infusions into unrestrained animals. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 5:363–365Google Scholar
  2. Bunney BS, Aghajanian GK (1977) Electrophysiological studies of dopamine-innervated cells in the frontal cortex. In: Costa E, Gessa GL (eds) Advances in biochemical psychopharmacology, vol 16, Raven Press, New York, pp 65–70Google Scholar
  3. Carter CJ, Pycock CJ (1980) Behavioral and biochemical effects of dopamine and noradrenaline depletion within the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat. Brain Res 192:163–176Google Scholar
  4. Collins RJ, Weeks JR, Cooper MM, Good PI, Russel RR (1984) Prediction of abuse liability of drugs using IV self-administration by rats. Psychopharmacology 82:6–13Google Scholar
  5. Cools AR (1977) Two functionally and pharmacologically distinct dopamine receptors in the rat brain. In: Costa E., Gessa GL (eds) Advances in biochemical psychopharmacology, vol 16, Raven Press, New York, pp 215–225Google Scholar
  6. Deminiere JM, Simon H, Herman JP, Le Moal M (1984) 6-Hydroxydopamine lesion of the dopamine mesocorticolimbic cell bodies increases (+)-amphetamine self-administration. Psychopharmacology 83:281–284Google Scholar
  7. Ettenberg A, Pettit HO, Bloom FE, Koob GF (1982) Heroin and cocaine intravenous self-administration in rats: Mediation by separate neural systems. Psychopharmacology 78:204–209Google Scholar
  8. Fallon JH (1982) Monoamine innervation of the forebrain: collateralization. Brain Res Bull 9:295–307Google Scholar
  9. Goeders NE, Smith JE (1983) Cortical involvement in cocaine reinforcement. Science 221:773–775PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Guerin GF, Goeders NE, Dworkin SI, Smith JE (1984) Intracranial self-administration of dopamine into the nucleus accumbens. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 14th Annual Meeting #347.5Google Scholar
  11. Hoebel BG, Monaco AP, Hernandez L, Aulisi EF, Stanley BG, Lenard L (1983) Self-injection of amphetamine directly into the brain. Psychopharmacology 81:158–163Google Scholar
  12. Joyce EM, Stinus L, Iversen SD (1983) Effect of injection of 6-OHDA into either nucleus accumbens septi or frontal cortex on spontaneous and drug-induced activity. Neuropharmacology 22:1141–1145Google Scholar
  13. Lee EHY, Geyer MA (1984) Indirect effects of apomorphine on serotoninergic neurons in rats. Neuroscience 11:437–442Google Scholar
  14. Lyness WH, Friedle NM, Moore KE (1979) Destruction of dopaminergic nerve terminals in nucleus accumbens: Effect on d-amphetamine self-administration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 11:553–556CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mogenson GJ, Yim CY (1981) Electrophysiological and neuropharmacological — behavioral studies of the nucleus accumbens: Implications for its role as a limbic-motor interface. In: Chronister RB, De France JF (eds) The neurobiology of the nucleus accumbens, Haer Institute for Electrophysiological Research, Maine, pp 210–229Google Scholar
  16. Pickens R, Thompson T (1968) Cocaine-reinforced behavior in rats: Effects of reinforcement magnitude and fixed ratio size. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 161:122–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pycock CJ, Carter CJ, Kerwin RW (1980) Effect of 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex on neurotransmitter systems in subcortical sites in the rat. J Neurochem 34:91–99Google Scholar
  18. Roberts DCS, Corcoran ME, Fibiger HC (1977) On the role of ascending catecholaminergic systems in intravenous self-administration of cocaine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 6:615–620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Roberts DCS, Koob GF (1982) Disruption of cocaine self-administration following 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the ventral tegmental area in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 17:901–904Google Scholar
  20. Roberts DCS, Koob GF, Klonoff P, Fibiger HC (1980) Extinction and recovery of cocaine self-administration following 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 12:781–787Google Scholar
  21. Yokel RA, Wise RA (1976) Attenuation of intravenous amphetamine reinforcement by central dopamine blockade in rats. Psychopharmacology 48:311–318Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. T. Martin-Iverson
    • 1
  • C. Szostak
    • 1
  • H. C. Fibiger
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Neurological Sciences, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations