Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 41, Issue 5, pp 620–625 | Cite as

Kinetics of the extracellular cellulases of Clostridium thermocellum acting on pretreated mixed hardwood and Avicel

  • T. D. Bernardez
  • K. A. Lyford
  • L. R. Lynd
Environmental Biotechnology Original Paper


Initial hydrolysis rates were examined for mixed hardwood flour pretreated with 1% sulfuric acid for 9 s at 220 °C (PTW220) and Avicel. Linear rates were observed for fractional conversion relative to the theoretical up to 0.2 for PTW220 and 0.4 for Avicel. Initial rates were essentially unaffected by the presence of growth medium components over a range of pH values. Avicel-hydrolyzing activity was inhibited linearly by ethanol, with a 50% rate reduction at 8 wt.% ethanol. Rate saturation with either substrate or enzyme was observed in a manner qualitatively consistent with previously reported adsorption data. Although somewhat less reactive than Avicel at very low enzyme loadings, much higher reaction rates were observed for PTW220 at moderate and high enzyme loading because of its higher capacity to bind cellulase. At equal subtrate concentrations (as potential glucose) and fractional substrate coverage of 0.09, the initial rate of pretreated wood hydrolysis exceeded that of Avicel by 15-fold. For fractional substrate coverage values up to 0.09 (the maximum value achieved for PTW220), the initial rate was proportional to adsorbed enzyme for PTW220. However, the rate per adsorbed enzyme declined sharply with increasing fractional coverage for Avicel hydrolysis.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agrawal P, Veeramallu UJ (1990) Ethanol fermentation by Z. mobilis ATCC10988 in repeated batch cultures. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 47:1–14Google Scholar
  2. Aubert JP, Beguin P, Millet J (1988) The cel (cellulose degradation genes) of Clastridium thermocellum. In: Aubert JP, Beguin P, Millet J (eds) Biochemistry and genetics of cellulose degradation. Academic Press, New York, pp 267–284Google Scholar
  3. Bazua CD, Wilke CR (1977) Ethanol effects on the kinetics of a continuous fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp 7:105–118Google Scholar
  4. Bernardez TD, Lyford K, Hogsett DA, Lynd LR (1993) Adsorption of the extracellular cellulase complex of Clostridium thermocellum onto pretreated mixed hardwood and Avicel. Biotechnol Bioeng 42:899–907Google Scholar
  5. Coughlan MP, Ljungdahl LG (1988) Comparative biochemistry of fungal and bacterial cellulolytic enzyme systems. In: Aubert JP, Beguin P, Millet J (eds) Biochemistry and genetics of cellulose degradation. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghose TK, Tyagi RD (1979) Rapid ethanol fermentation of cellulose hydrolyzate. II. Product and substrate inhibition and optimization of fermentor design. Biotechnol Bioeng 21:1401–1420Google Scholar
  7. Ghose P, Pamment NB, Martin WRB (1982) Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cellulose: effect of β-d-glucose activity and ethanol inhibition of cellulases. Enzyme Microb Technol 4:425–430Google Scholar
  8. Gusakov AV, Sinitsyn AP, Klyosov AA (1985) Kinetics of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: 1. A mathematical model for a batch reactor process. Enzyme Microb Technol 7:346–352Google Scholar
  9. Hogsett DA, Ahn H-J, Bernardez TD, South CR, Lynd LR (1992) Direct microbial conversion: prospects, progress, and obstacles. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 34/35:527–541Google Scholar
  10. Holzberg I, Finn RK, Steinkraus KH (1967) A kinetic study of the alcoholic fermentation of grape juice. Biotechnol Bioeng 9:413–427Google Scholar
  11. Jobses IML, Roels JA (1986) The inhibition of the maximum specific growth and fermentation rate of Zymomonas mobilis by ethanol. Biotechnol Bioeng 28:554–563Google Scholar
  12. Johnson EA, Reese ET, Demain AL (1982a) Inhibition of Clostridium thermocellum cellulase by end products of cellulolysis. J Appl Biochem 4:64–71Google Scholar
  13. Johnson EA, Sakojoh M, Halliwell G, Madia A, Demain AL (1982b) Saccharification of complex cellulosic substrates by the cellulase system of Clostridium thermocellum. Appl Environ Microbiol 43:1125–1132Google Scholar
  14. Lamed R, Bayer EA (1988) The cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum. Adv Appl Microbiol 33:2–41Google Scholar
  15. Lee KJ, Rogers PL (1983) The fermentation kinetics of Zymomonas mobilis. Chem Eng J 27:B31-B38Google Scholar
  16. Lynd LR, Grethlein HE (1987) Hydrolysis of dilute acid pretreated mixed hardwood and purified microcrystalline cellulose by cell-free broth from Clostridium thermocellum. Biotechnol Bioeng 29:92–100Google Scholar
  17. Lynd LR, Ahn H-J, Anderson G, Hill P, Kersey DS, Klapatch T (1991) Appl Biochem Biotechnol 28/29:549–570Google Scholar
  18. Lynd LR, Ahn H-J, Hogsett DA, South CR (1992) Advanced concepts for cellulose conversion. In: Proceedings of the annual automotive contractors technology development meeting, SAE, Warrendale, pp 751–758Google Scholar
  19. Pietersen N, Ross E (1979) Mathematical model for enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of cellulose by Trichoderma. Biotechnol Bioeng 21:997–1017Google Scholar
  20. Puls J, Wood TM (1991) The degradation of cellulose by extracellular cellulases of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms. Bioresour Technol 36:15–19Google Scholar
  21. Ryu DDY, Lee SB, Tassinari T, Macy C (1982) Effect of compression milling on cellulose structure and on enzymatic hydrolysis kinetics. Biotechnol Bioeng 24:1047–1067Google Scholar
  22. Wald S, Wilke CR, Blanch HW (1984) Kinetics of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 26:221–230Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. D. Bernardez
    • 1
  • K. A. Lyford
    • 1
  • L. R. Lynd
    • 1
  1. 1.Thayer School of EngineeringDartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA

Personalised recommendations