Comments on the analysis of returned comet samples
- 29 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
It is first argued that, when comet sampled are returned, they should be distributed to individual laboratories for analysis in the way that lunar samples, meteorites, and interplanetary dust particles have been studied in the past. The intellectual ferment engendered by recent discoveries should ensure the viability of groups working in extraterrestrial material research into the indefinite future. Many of the recent discoveries have resulted from application of increasingly sophisticated methods of microanalysis. #the interplay between technological developments and scientific work is underscored and it is argued that increased technical support for extraterrestrial material research should lead to instrumental developments that could have widespread practical applications.
A brief review of certain potentially relevant technical developments in other fields is given and it is suggested that microanalytic measurements of extraterrestrial samples at the atom-counting limit appear promising for the future. The special problems raised by the necessity for cryogenic examination of comet samples are briefly discussed and it is concluded that the lack of expertise in this area is a current weakness in the ability of the extraterrestrial material community to handle comet samples. Computer tomography scan images of a dirty snowball are presented to illustrate the importance of developing new methods for comet sample analysis.
Keywords
Dust Computer Tomography Dust Particle Technical Support Technical DevelopmentPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Alexander, C. M. O'D., Swan, P. D., and Walker, R. M.: 1990a, Lunar Planet. Sci. XXI, 11–12 The Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston.Google Scholar
- Alexander, C. M.O'D, Swan, P., and Walker, R. M.: 1990b, In situ location of interstellar SiC in two CM meteorites. ICOG 7 Conference, Canberra, Australia, in press.Google Scholar
- Arnold, J. R., Testa, J. P. Jr., Friedman, P. J., and Kambic G. X.: 1982, Science 219, 383–384.Google Scholar
- Betzig, E., Lewis, A., Harootunian, A., Isaacson, M., and Kratschmer, E.: 1986, Biophys. J. 49, 269–280.Google Scholar
- Bradley, J.P.: 1991, in E.K. Jessberger (ed.) Analysis of Samples from Solar System Bodies Space Science Reviews, this volume.Google Scholar
- Bradley, J. P., Sandford, S. A., and Walker, R. M.: 1988, in J. F. Kerridge and M. S. Matthews (eds.) Meteorities and the Early Solar System, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 861–895.Google Scholar
- Bradley, J.P. and Brownlee, D. E.: 1986, Science 231, 1542–1544.Google Scholar
- Eigler, D. M. and Schweizer, E. K.: 1990, Nature 344, 524–526.Google Scholar
- Ellingson, W. A. and Vannier, M. W.: 1989, in C. S. Barrett, J. V. Gilfrich, R. Jenkins, T.C. Huang and P.K. Predecki (eds.), Advances in X-ray Analysis 32: Plenum Publishing Corp., pp. 629–639.Google Scholar
- Flannery, B. P., Deckman, H. W., Roberge, W. G., and D'Amico K. L.: 1987, Science 237, 1439–1444.Google Scholar
- Flynn, G. J., Sutton, S. R., and Rivers, M. L.: 1990, Non-destructive analyses of cometary nucleus samples using synchrotron radiation. Proc. of the Workshop on Analysis of Returned Comet Nucleus Samples, Milipitas, CA, Jan. 1989, submitted.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, J.M.: 1991, in E.K. Jessberger (ed.) Analysis of Samples from Solar System Bodies Space Science Reviews, this volume.Google Scholar
- Lewis, R. S., Tang, M., Wacker, J. F., Anders, E., and Steel, E.: 1987, Nature 326, 160–162.Google Scholar
- Lieberman, K., Harush, S., Lewis, A., and Kopelman, R.: 1990, Science 247, 59–61.Google Scholar
- Maurette, M., Jéhanno, C., Robin, E., and Hammer, C.: 1987, Nature 328, 699–702.Google Scholar
- Maurette, M., Pourchet, M., Bonny, Ph., de Angelis, M., and Siry, P.: 1989, Lunar Planet. Sci. XX, 644–645. The Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston.Google Scholar
- McKeegan, K. D., Walker, R. M., and Zinner, E.: 1987, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 49, 1971–1987.Google Scholar
- Nier, A. O. and Schlutter, D. J.: 1990, Lunar Planet. Sci. XXI, 883–884. The Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston.Google Scholar
- Olinger, C. T., Maurette, M., Walker, R. M., and Hohenberg, C. M.: 1990, Neon measurements of individual Greenland sediment particles: proof of an extraterrestrial origin and comparison with EDX and morphological analyses. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett, in press.Google Scholar
- Pillinger, C.T., Grady, M.M., and Wright, I.P.: 1991, in E.K. Jessberger (ed.) Analysis of Samples from Solar System Bodies Space Science Reviews, this volume.Google Scholar
- Planetary Materials and Geochemistry Working Group: 1988, Advanced Analytical Facilities Report. LPI Tech. Rpt. 88–11. Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, 38 pp.Google Scholar
- Stadermann, F. J., Walker, R. M., and Zinner, E.: 1989, Meteoritics 24, 327.Google Scholar
- Stadermann, F. Walker, R. M., and Zinner, E.: 1990, Lunar Planet. Sci. XXI, 1190–1191. The Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston.Google Scholar
- Swan, P. D., Walker, R. M., and Yuan, J.: 1989, Lunar Planet. Sci. XX, 1093–1094. The Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston.Google Scholar
- Turner, G.: 1991, in E.K. Jessberger (ed.) Analysis of Samples from Solar System Bodies Space Science Reviews, this volume.Google Scholar
- Wickramasinghe, H. K.: 1989, Scientific American (October), 98–105.Google Scholar
- Zenobi R., Phillippoz, J.-M., Buseck, P. R., Kovalenko, L. J., Bucenell, J. R., and Zare, R. N.: 1991, in E.K. Jessberger (ed.) Analysis of Samples from Solar System Bodies Space Science Reviews, this volume.Google Scholar
- Zinner, E.: 1991, in E.K. Jessberger (ed.) Analysis of Samples from Solar System Bodies Space Science Reviews, this volume.Google Scholar