Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 105–111 | Cite as

Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution

  • Ziheng Yang
Article

Abstract

Knowledge of the pattern of nucleotide substitution is important both to our understanding of molecular sequence evolution and to reliable estimation of phylogenetic relationships. The method of parsimony analysis, which has been used to estimate substitution patterns in real sequences, has serious drawbacks and leads to results difficult to interpret. In this paper a model-based maximum likelihood approach is proposed for estimating substitution patterns in real sequences. Nucleotide substitution is assumed to follow a homogeneous Markov process, and the general reversible process model (REV) and the unrestricted model without the reversibility assumption are used. These models are also applied to examine the adequacy of the model of Hasegawa et al. (J. Mol. Evol. 1985;22:160–174) (HKY85). Two data sets are analyzed. For the Ψν-globin pseudogenes of six primate species, the REV model fits the data much better than HKY85, while, for a segment of mtDNA sequences from nine primates, REV cannot provide a significantly better fit than HKY85 when rate variation over sites is taken into account in the models. It is concluded that the use of the REV model in phylogenetic analysis can be recommended, especially for large data sets or for sequences with extreme substitution patterns, while HKY85 may be expected to provide a good approximation. The use of the unrestricted model does not appear to be worthwhile.

Key words

Substitution patterns Models Markov process Reversible process Sequence divergence Maximum likelihood DNA sequences 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barry D, Hartigan JA (1987) Statistical analysis of hominoid molecular evolution. Star Sci 2:191–210Google Scholar
  2. Brown WM, Prager EM, Wang A, Wilson AC (1982) Mitochondrial DNA sequences of primates, tempo and mode of evolution. J Mol Evol 18:225–239Google Scholar
  3. Dayhoff MO (1978) Atlas of protein sequence and structure, vol 5, suppl 3. National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, DC, pp 347Google Scholar
  4. Felsenstein J (1981) Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 17:368–376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gojobori T, Yokoyama S (1987) Molecular evolutionary rates of oncogenes. J Mol Evol 26:148–156Google Scholar
  6. Gojobori T, Ishii K, Nei M (1982a) Estimation of average number of nucleotide substitutions when the rate of substitution varies with nucleotides. J Mol Evol 18:414–423Google Scholar
  7. Gojobori T, Li WH, Graur D (1982b) Patterns of nucleotide substitution in pseudogenes and functional genes. J Mol Evol 18: 360–369Google Scholar
  8. Goldman N (1990) Maximum likelihood inference of phylogenetic trees, with special reference to Poisson process models of DNA substitution and to parsimony analysis. Syst Zool 39:345–361Google Scholar
  9. Goldman N (1993) Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution. J Mol Evol 36:182–198Google Scholar
  10. Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T (1985) Dating the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol 22:160–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Imanishi T, Gojobori T (1992) Patterns of nucleotide substitutions inferred from the phylogenies of the class I major histocompatibility complex genes. J Mol Evol 35:196–204Google Scholar
  12. Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New York, pp 21–123Google Scholar
  13. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kimura M (1981) Estimation of evolutionary distances between homologous nucleotide sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78: 454–458Google Scholar
  15. Kishino H, Miyata T, Hasegawa M (1990) Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny and the origin of chloroplasts. J Mol Evol 31:151–160Google Scholar
  16. Lanave C, Preparata G, Saccone C, Serio G (1984) A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J Mol Evol 20:86–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Li W-H, Wu C-I, Luo C-C (1984) Nonrandomness of point mutation as reflected in nucleotide substitutions in pseudogenes and its evolutionary implications. J Mol Evol 21:58–71Google Scholar
  18. Li W-H, Wu C-I, Luo C-C (1985) Evolution of DNA sequences. In: MacIntyre J (ed) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–94Google Scholar
  19. Miyamoto MM, Slighton JL, Goodman M (1987) Phylogenetic relations of humans and African apes from DNA sequences in the Ψν-globin region. Science 238:369–373Google Scholar
  20. Moriyama EN, Ina Y, Iheo K, Shimizu N, Gojobori T (1991) Mutation pattern of human immunodeficiency virus genes. J Mol Evol 32:360–363Google Scholar
  21. Navidi WC, Churchill GA, von Haeseler A (1991) Methods for inferring phylogenies from nucleotide acid sequence data by using maximum likelihood and linear invariants. Mol Biol Evol 8: 128–143Google Scholar
  22. Reeves JH (1992) Heterogeneity in the substitution process of amino acid sites of proteins coded for by mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol 35:17–31Google Scholar
  23. Ritland K, Clegg MT (1987) Evolutionary analysis of plant DNA sequences. Am Nat 130:S74-S100Google Scholar
  24. Rodriguez F, Oliver JF, Marin A, Medina JR (1990) The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitutions. J Theor Biol 142: 485–501PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Tamura K (1992) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G + C-content biases. Mol Biol Evol 9:678–687Google Scholar
  26. Tamura K, Nei M (1993) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10:512–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Tavare S (1986) Some probabilistic and statistical problems on the analysis of DNA sequences. In: Lectures in mathematics in the life sciences, vol 17. pp 57–86Google Scholar
  28. Thompson E (1975) Human evolutionary trees. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilbur WJ (1985) On the PAM matrix model of protein evolution. Mol Biol Evol 2:434–447Google Scholar
  30. Yang Z (1992) Variations of substitution rates and estimation of evolutionary distances of DNA sequences. PhD Thesis, Beijing Agricultural University, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  31. Yang Z (1993) Maximum likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol Biol Evol 10:1396–1401PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Yang Z, Goldman N (in press) Evaluation and extension of Markov process models of nucleotide substitution. Acta Genetica SinicaGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang Z, Goldman N, Friday AE (in press) Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation. Mol Biol EvolGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ziheng Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations