Argumentation

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 233–254 | Cite as

Burden of proof

  • Douglas N. Walton
Article

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of the concept of burden of proof in argument. Relationship of burden of proof to three traditional informal fallacies is considered: (i) argumentum ad hominem, (ii) petitio principii, and (iii) argumentum ad ignorantiam. Other topics discussed include persuasive dialoque, pragmatic reasoning, legal burden of proof, plausible reasoning in regulated disputes, rules of dialogue, and the value of reasoned dialogue.

Key words

Argumentation persuasion dialogue fallacies rhetoric informal logic pragmatics presumption 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barth, E. M. and Krabbe, E. C. W.: 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
  2. Bratko, Ivan: 1986, Prolog Programming for Artificial Intelligence, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, Robert: 1970, ‘The Burden of Proof,’ American Philosophical Quarterly 7, 74–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Clifford, W. K.: 1877, ‘The Will to Believe,’ Contemporary Review 30, 42–54.Google Scholar
  5. Encyclopedia Britannica, vol. 8, 15th ed., Chicago, 1973. Article on ‘Evidence’ by “R. E. De,” 905–916.Google Scholar
  6. Forsyth, Richard: 1984, Expert Systems, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  7. Hamblin, C.L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen,London.Google Scholar
  8. James, William: 1896, The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy, Longmans Green, London.Google Scholar
  9. Rescher, Nicholas: 1976, Plausible Reasoning, Van Gorcum, Assen and Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  10. Rescher, Nicholas: 1977, Dialectics, State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
  11. Robinson, Richard: 1971, ‘Arguing from Ignorance,’ Philosophical Quarterly 21, 97–108.Google Scholar
  12. Sproule, J. Michael: 1976, ‘The Psychological Burden of Proof,’ Communication Monographs 43, 115–129.Google Scholar
  13. Eemeren, Frans H. van and Grootendorst, Rob: 1984, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  14. Walton, Douglas N.: 1985, Arguer's Position, Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut.Google Scholar
  15. Walton, Douglas N. and Batten, Lynn M.: 1984, ‘Games, Graphs and Circular Arguments,’ Logique et Analyse 106, 133–164.Google Scholar
  16. Woods, John and Walton, Douglas: 1978, ‘The Fallacy of Ad Ignorantiam,’ Dialectica 32, 87–99.Google Scholar
  17. Whately, Richard: 1828, Elements of of Rhetoric, ed. Douglas Ehninger, Carbondale and Edwardsville, Southern Illinois University Press. Reprint of 7th ed. of 1846.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas N. Walton
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of WinnipegWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations