On the construction of effectiveness of interaction tables

Bandura, A. (1977). “Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change”. Psychological Review 84: 191–215.Google Scholar

Carlyn, M. (1977). “An assessment of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator”. Journal of Personality Assessment 41: 461–473.Google Scholar

Carver, C.S. (1979). “A cybernetic model of self-attention processes”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 37: 1251–1281.Google Scholar

Conary, F.M. (1966). “An investigation of the variability of behavioral response of Jungian psychological types to select educational variables” (Doctoral dissertation. Auburn University, 1965). Dissertation Abstracts 26: 5222–5223. (University Microfilms No. 65–13. No. 898.)Google Scholar

Hoffman, J.L. (1975). “Personality relationships between supervising teachers and student teachers as determined by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, 1974). Dissertation Abstracts International 36: 830-A-831A. (University Microfilms No. 75-16, No. 393.)Google Scholar

Kerin, R.A. and Slocum, J.W. (1981). “Decision-making style and acquisition of information: further exploration of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator”. Psychological Reports 49: 132–134.Google Scholar

Kim, K.H. and Roush, F.W. (1980). “Mathematics for Social Scientists”. New York: Elsevier/North-Holland.Google Scholar

Lavalle, I.H. (1978). “Fundamentals of Decision Analysis”. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Myers, I.B. (1962). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Manual. Princeton, N.Y.: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar

Ross, J. (1966). “The relationship between a Jungian personality inventory and tests of ability, personality, and interest”. Australian Journal of Psychology, 18: 1–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Rotter, J.B. (1954). Social Learning and Clinical Psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Steckroth, R.L., Slocum, J.W. and Sims, H.P. (1980). “Organizational roles, cognitive roles and problem-solving styles”. Journal of Experimental Learning and Simulation 2: 77–87.Google Scholar