Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 207–219 | Cite as

Flexible bat echolocation: the influence of individual, habitat and conspecifics on sonar signal design

  • Martin K. Obrist
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Acoustic signals which are used in animal communication must carry a variety of information and are therefore highly flexible. Echolocation has probably such functions and could prove as flexible. Measurable variabitlity can indicate flexibility in a behaviour. To quantify variability in bat sonar and relate to behavioural and environmental factors, I recorded echolocation calls of Euderma maculatum, Eptesicus fuscus, Lasiurus borealis and L. cinereus while the bats hunted in their natural habitat. I analysed 3390 search phase calls emitted by 16 known and 16 unknown individuals foraging in different environmental and behvioural situations. All four species used mainly multiharmonic signals that showed considerable intra- and inter-individual variability in the five signal variables I analysed (call duration, call interval, highest and lowest frequency and frequency with maximum energy) and also in the shape of the sonagram. A nested multivariate analysis of variance identified the influences of individual, hunting site, close conspecifics and of each observation on the frequency with maximum energy in the calls, and on other variables measured. Individual bats differed in multiple comparisons, most often in the main call frequency and least often in call interval. In a discriminant function analysis with resubstitution, 56–76% of a species' calls were assigned to the correct individual. Distinct individual call patterns were recorded in special situations in all species and the size of foraging areas in forested areas influenced temporal and spectral call structure. Echolocation behaviour was influenced by the presence of conspecifics. When bats were hunting together, call duration decreased and call interval increased in all species, but spectral effects were less pronounced. The role of morphometric differences as the source of individually distinct vocalizations is discussed. I also examined signal adaptations to long range echolocation and the influence of obstacle distance on echolocation call design. My results allow to discuss the problems of echo recognition and jamming avoidance in vespertilionid bats.

Key words

Sonar Echolocation Variability Jamming avoidance Vespertilionidae 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahlén I (1981) Identification of Scandinavian bats by their sounds (Department of wildlife Ecology Report 6). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  2. Balcombe J, Fenton MB (1988) Eavesdropping by bats: the influence of echolocation call design and foraging strategies. Ethology 79:158–166Google Scholar
  3. Barclay RMR (1983) Echolocation calls of emballonurid bats from Panama. J Comp Physiol 151:515–520Google Scholar
  4. Barclay RMR (1986) The echolocation calls of hoary (Lasiurus cinereus) and silver-haired (Lasionycteris noctivagans) bats as adaptations for long- versus short-range foraging strategies and the consequences for prey selection. Can J Zool 64:2700–2705Google Scholar
  5. Beer CG (1970) Individual recognition of voice in the social behavior of birds. In: Lehrman DS, Hinde RA, Shaw E (eds) Advances in the study of behavior, vol 3 Academic Press, New York, pp 27–74Google Scholar
  6. Belwood JJ, Fullard JH (1984) Echolocation and foraging behavior in the Hawaiian hoary bat, Lasiurus cinereus semotus. Can J Zool 62:2113–2120Google Scholar
  7. Beuter KJ (1980) A new concept of echo evaluation in the auditory system of bats. In: Busnel RG, Fish JF (eds) Animal sonar systems. Plenum, New York, pp 747–761Google Scholar
  8. Brigham RM, Cebek JE, Hickey MBC (1989) Intraspecific variation in the echolocation calls of two species of insectivorous bats. J Mammal 70:426–428Google Scholar
  9. Brown PE (1976) Vocal communication in the pallid bat, Antrozous pallidus. Z Tierpsychol 41:34–54Google Scholar
  10. Brown PE, Brown TW, Grinnell AD (1983) Echolocation, development, and vocal communication in the lesser bulldog bat, Noctilio albiventris. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 13:287–298Google Scholar
  11. Bullock TH, Hamstra RH, Scheich H (1972) The jamming avoidance response of high-frequency electric fish, I and II. J Comp Physiol 77:1–48Google Scholar
  12. Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1980) Vocal recognition in free-ranging vervet monkeys. Anim Behav 28:362–367Google Scholar
  13. Day RW, Quinn GP (1989) Comparison of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecol Monogr 59:433–463Google Scholar
  14. Fenton MB (1984) Echolocation: implications for ecology and evolution of bats. Q Rev Biol 59:33–53Google Scholar
  15. Fenton MB (1985) Communication in the Chiroptera. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  16. Fenton MB (1990) The foraging behaviour and ecology of animal-eating bats. Can J Zool 68:411–422Google Scholar
  17. Fenton MB, Bell GP (1981) Recognition of species of insectivorous bats by their echolocation calls. J Mammal 62:233–243Google Scholar
  18. Gelfand DL, McCracken GF (1986) Individual variation in the isolation calls of Mexican free-tailed bat pups (Tadarida brasiliensis mexicana). Anim Behav 34:1078–1086Google Scholar
  19. Gould E (1971) Studies of maternal-infant communication and development of vocalizations in the bats Myotis and Eptesicus. Commun Behav Biol 5:263–313Google Scholar
  20. Griffin DR (1958) Listening in the dark. Yale University Press, New Haven, ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  21. Griffin DR, Webster FA, Michael CR (1960) The echolocation of flying insects by bats. Anim Behav 8:141–154Google Scholar
  22. Grinnell AD, Schnitzler HU (1977) Directional sensitivity of echolocation in the horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. II. Behavioral directionality of hearing. J Comp Physiol 116:63–76Google Scholar
  23. Habersetzer J (1981) Adaptive echolocation sounds in the bat Rhinopoma hardwickei. J Comp Physiol 144:559–566Google Scholar
  24. Hickey MBC, Fenton MB (1990) Foraging by red bats (Lasiurus borealis): do intraspecific chases mean territoriality? Can J Zool 68:2477–2482Google Scholar
  25. Jones G, Hughes PM, Rayner JMV (1991) The development of vocalizations in Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) during post-natal growth and the maintenance of individual vocal signatures. J Zool Lend 225:71–84Google Scholar
  26. Jones G, Gordon T, Nightingale J (1992) Sex and age differences in the echolocation calls of the lesser horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus hipposideros. Mammalia 56:189–193Google Scholar
  27. Kalko EKV, Schnitzler H-U (1993) Plasticity in echolocation signals of European pipistrelle bats in search flight: implications for habitat use and prey detection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:415–428Google Scholar
  28. Kolb VA (1977) Wie erkennen sich Mutter und Junges des Mausohrs, Myotis myotis, bei der Rückkehr vom Jagdflug wieder? Z Tierpsycbol 44:423–431Google Scholar
  29. Lawrence BD, Simmons JA (1982) Measurements of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and the significance for echolocating bats. J Acoust Soc Am 71:585–590Google Scholar
  30. Leonard ML, Fenton MB (1983) Habitat use by the spotted bats (Euderma maculatum, Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae): roosting and foraging behaviour. Can J Zool 61:1487–1491Google Scholar
  31. Leonard ML, Fenton MB (1984) Echolocation calls of Euderma maculatum (Vespertilionidae): use in Orientation and communication. J Mammal 65:122–126Google Scholar
  32. Masters WM, Jacobs SC, Simmons JA (1990) The structure of echolocation sounds used by the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus: some consequences for echo processing. J Acoust Soc Am 89:1402–1413Google Scholar
  33. McGregor PK, Westby GWM (1992) Discrimination of individually characteristic electric organ discharges by a weakly electric fish. Anim Behav 43:977–986Google Scholar
  34. Miller LA, Degn HL (1981) The acoustic behavior of four species of vespertilionid bats studied in the field. J Comp Physiol 142:67–74Google Scholar
  35. Möhres FP (1953) Jugendentwicklung des Orientierungsverhaltens bei Fledermäusen. Naturwissenschaften 10:298–299Google Scholar
  36. Möhres FP (1967) Communicative characters of sonar signals in bats. In: Busnel RG (ed) Animal sonar systems II, Laboratoire de Physiologie acoustique, Jouy-en-Josas, pp 939–945Google Scholar
  37. Neuweiler G, Metzner W, Heilmann U, Rübsamen R, Eckrich M, Costa HH (1987) Foraging behavior and echolocation in the rufous horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus rouxi) of Sri Lanka. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:53–67Google Scholar
  38. Obrist M (1988) Individually recognizable freeflying bats: a new method to record and analyze their echolocation calls. Myotis 26:87–95Google Scholar
  39. Obrist M, Aldridge HDJN, Fenton MB (1989) Roosting and echolocation behavior of the African bat, Clialinolobus variegatus. J Mammal 70(4):828–833Google Scholar
  40. Obrist MK, Fenton MB, Eger JE, Schlegel PA (1993) What ears do for bats: a comparative study of pinna sound pressure transformation in Chiroptera. J Exp Biol 180:119–152Google Scholar
  41. Pye JD (1972) Bimodal distribution of constant frequencies in some hipposiderid bats (Mammalia: Hipposideridae). J Zool Lond 166:323–335Google Scholar
  42. Pye JD (1973) Echolocation by constant frequency bats. Period Biol 75:21–26Google Scholar
  43. Pye JD (1978) Some preliminary observations on flexible echolocation systems. In: Olembo RJ, Castelino JB, Muttee FA (eds) Proceedings of the Fourth International Bat Research Conference. Kenya literature bureau, Nairobi, pp 127–136Google Scholar
  44. Roverud RC, Grinell AD (1985) Echolocation sound features processed to provide distance information in the CF/FM bat, Noctilio albiventris: evidence for a gated time window utilizing both CF and FM components. J Comp Physiol A 156:457–469Google Scholar
  45. Rydell J (1990) Behavioral variation in echolocation pulses of the northern bat, Eptesicus nilssoni. Ethology 85:103–113Google Scholar
  46. Rydell J (1993) Variation in the sonar of an aerial-hawking bat (Eptesicus nilssoni). Ethology 93:275–284Google Scholar
  47. Scherrer JA, Wilkinson GS (1993) Evening bat isolation calls provide evidence for heritable signatures. Anim Behav 46:847–860Google Scholar
  48. Schmidt S (1988) Evidence for a spectral basis of texture perception in bat sonar. Nature 331:617–619Google Scholar
  49. Schnitzler H-U, Grinnell AD (1977) Directional sensitivity of echolocation in the horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. I. Directionality of sound emission. J Comp Physiol 116:51–61Google Scholar
  50. Schnitzler H-U, Kalko E, Miller E, Surlykke A (1987) The echolocation and hunting behavior of the bat, Pipistrellus kuhli. J Comp Physiol A 161:267–274Google Scholar
  51. Schumm A, Krull D, Neuweiler G (1991) Echolocation in the notch-eared bat, Myotis emarginatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:255–261Google Scholar
  52. Sieber OJ (1986) Acoustic recognition between mother and cubs in racoons (Procyon lotor). Behavior 96:130–163Google Scholar
  53. Simmons JA, O'Farrell MJ (1977) Echolocation in the long-eared bat, Plecotus phyllotis. J Comp Physiol 122:201–214Google Scholar
  54. Simmons JA, Stein RA (1980) Acoustic imaging in bat sonar: echolocation signals and the evolution of echolocation. J Comp Physiol 135:61–84Google Scholar
  55. Simmons JA, Altes RA, Beuter KJ, Bullock TH, Capranica RR, Goldstein JL, Griffin DR, Konishi M, Neff WD, Neuweiler G, Schnitzler HU, Schuller G, Sovijarvi ARA, Suga N (1977) Localization and identification of acoustic signals, with reference to echolocation. In: Bullock TH (ed), Recognition of complex acoustic signals. Aberkon, Berlin, pp 239–277Google Scholar
  56. Simmons JA, Lavender WA, Lavender BA, Childs JE, Hulebak K, Rigden MR, Sherman J, Woolman B, O'Farrell MJO (1978) Echolocation by free-tailed bats (Tadarida). J Comp Physiol 125:291–299Google Scholar
  57. Simmons JA, Freedman EG, Stevenson SB, Chen L, Wohlgenant TJ (1989) Clutter interference and the integration time of echoes in the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus. J Acoust Soc Am 86:1318–1332Google Scholar
  58. Suthers RA, Hector DH (1988) Individual variation in vocal tract resonance may assist oilbirds in recognizing echoes of their own sonar clicks. In: Nachtigall, PE, Moore PWB (eds) Animal sonar. Plenum, New York, pp 87–91Google Scholar
  59. Thomas DW, Bell GP, Fenton MB (1987) Variation in echolocation call frequencies recorded from north american vespertilionid bats: a cautionary note. J Mammal 68:842–84Google Scholar
  60. Watson A (1970) Electronic aids to the identification of bats in flight and their study under natural conditions. Proceedings of the second International Bat Research Conference. Bijdr Dierk 40:99–102Google Scholar
  61. Zbinden K (1989) Field observation on the flexibility of the acoustic behavior of the european bat Nyctalus noctula (Schreber, 1774). Rev Suisse Zool 96:335–343Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin K. Obrist
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoologisches Institut der UniversitätMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations