Human Studies

, Volume 11, Issue 2–3, pp 201–234 | Cite as

The externalized retina: Selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences

  • Michael Lynch

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alpers, S. (1983). The art of describing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bastide, F. (1985). Iconographie des textes scientifiques: Principes d'analyse. Culture Technique (14):132–151.Google Scholar
  3. Bradbury, S. (1967). The microscope, past and present. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Callon, M., Law, J., and Rip, A. (1985). Qualitative scientometrics: Studies in the dynamic of science. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Edgerton, S. (1976). The Renaissance discovery of linear perspective. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  6. Ferguson, E. (1977). The mind's eye: Non-verbal thought in technology. Science 197:827ff.Google Scholar
  7. Garfinkel, H. (forthcoming). A manual for the study of naturally organized ordinary activities. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  8. Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., and Livingston, E. (1981). The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11(2):131–158.Google Scholar
  9. Gilbert, G.N., and Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gooding, D. (1986). How do scientists reach agreement about novel observations? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 17.Google Scholar
  11. Goody, J. (1977). The Domestication of the savage mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gurwitsch, A. (1964). The field of consciousness. Duquesne: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ivins, W. (1973). On the rationalisation of sight. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  16. Jacoby, D. (1985), Vulgarisation et illustration dans les sciences de la vie. Culture Technique (14):152–163.Google Scholar
  17. James, W. (1905). The principles of psychology. New York. Kirk, R., and Daugherty, R.D. (1978). Exploring Washington Archaeology. Seattle and London.Google Scholar
  18. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay in the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Latour, B. (1986). Visualisation and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present 6:1–40.Google Scholar
  20. Latour, B., and De Noblet, J., Eds. (1985). Les “vues” de l'esprit. Special Issue of Culture Technique (14) (June).Google Scholar
  21. Latour, B., and Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Lynch, G., Rose, G., Gall, C,, and Cotman, C.W. (1975). The response of the dentate gyrus to partial deafferentation. Golgi centennial symposium proceedings. New York.Google Scholar
  23. Lynch, M. (1985a). Discipline and the material form of image: An analysis of scientific visibility. Social Studies of Science 15:37–66.Google Scholar
  24. Lynch, M. (1985b). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  25. Morrison, K. (1988). Some researchable recurrences in science and situated science inquiry. In D. Helm et al. (Eds.), The interactional order. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  26. O'Neill, J. (1981). The literary production of natural and social science inquiry. Canadian Journal of Sociology 6:105–120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ritterbush, P. (1972). Aesthetics and objectivity in the study of form in the life sciences. In G.S. Rousseau (Ed.), Organic form: The life of an idea. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  28. Rudwick, M. (1976). The emergence of a visual language for geological science 1760–1840. History of Science 14:148–195.Google Scholar
  29. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation, Language 50(4): 696–735.Google Scholar
  30. Schutz, A. (1962). Collected papers I: The problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  31. Shapin, S. (1984). Pump and circumstance: Robert Boyle's literary technology. Social Studies of Science 14:481–521.Google Scholar
  32. Star, S.L. (1983). Simplification in scientific work: An example from the neurosciences. Social Studies of Science 13:205–228.Google Scholar
  33. Tilling, L. (1975). Early experimental graphs. The British Journal for the History of Science 8(30):193–213.Google Scholar
  34. Turner, G. L'E. (1967). The miscroscope as a technical frontier in science. In G. L'E. Turner (Ed.), Historical aspects of microscopy. Cambridge: W. Heffer and Sons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Lynch
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations