European Radiology

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 322–325 | Cite as

Radiation osteoporosis — an assessment using single energy quantitative computed tomography

  • Kinji Nishiyama
  • Fumitaka Inaba
  • Tokurou Higashihara
  • Kouji Kitatani
  • Takahiro Kozuka
Original Articles Muskuloskeletal Radiology


Radiation osteoporosis was assessed with single energy quantitative computed tomography (QCT) on 23 patients with cervical cancer. Eleven cases formed the radiation group, who received irradiation to the lumbar column. The other 12 cases formed the control group and were not irradiated. The absorbed dose to the lumbar column was 45 Gy over 5 weeks in nine cases and 22.5 Gy over 5 weeks in two cases. Bone mineral content (BMC) at the 3rd lumbar vertebra was scanned with QCT. BMC reduction was substantial in the radiation group and not evident in the control group. The mean reduction of the former was 52 mg/cm3 at the end of irradiation. The differences in changes of BMC between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.01). The two cases who received 22.5 Gy revealed similar BMC reduction to those who received 45 Gy. QCT performed at the end of irradiation demonstrated that more than 22.5 Gy over 5 weeks induced substantial osteoporotic changes.

Key words

Radiotherapy Bone injury Osteoporosis Quantitative computed tomography 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Rubin P, Casarett GW (1972) Clinical Radiation Pathology. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nishimura T, Shimizu T, Sugiyama A, Ichinole K, Teshima T, Takahashi M, Takai M, Kaneko M (1990) Insufficiency fracture of the pelvis after the radiotherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Nippon Acta Radiol 50: 1243–1252Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gluer CC, Steiger P, Selvidge R, Genant HK (1990) Comparative assessment of dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy radiography. Radiology 174: 223–228Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cann CE, Genant HK (1980) Precise measurement of vertebral mineral content using computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 4: 493–500Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moss WT (1989) Radiation Oncology. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dahl DC (1936) La theorie de L'osteoclasie et le comportement des osteoclastes vis a vis du bleu trypan et vis a vis de l'irradiation aux rayons X. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand Suppl 26: 234–239Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Genant HK, Cann CE, Mucelli RSP, Kanter AS (1982) Vertebral mineral determination by quantitative CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 7: 554Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Howland WJ, Loeffler RK, Stachman DE, Johnson RG (1975) Postirradiation atrophic changes of bone and related complications. Radiology 117: 677–685Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sengupta S, Prathap K (1973) Radiation necrosis of the humerus: a report of three cases. Acta Radiol [Ther] 12: 313–320Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cann CE, Genant HK, Kolb FO (1984) Quantitative computed tomography for prediction of vertebral fracture risk. Metab Bone Dis Relat Res 5: 1–7Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Genant HK, Cann CE, Boyd DP (1983) Quantitative computed tomography for mineral determination. In: Proceedings of Henry Ford Hospital Symposium on Clinical Disorders of Bone and Mineral Metabolism. Excepta Medica, New York, pp 40–47Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kinji Nishiyama
    • 1
  • Fumitaka Inaba
    • 1
  • Tokurou Higashihara
    • 2
  • Kouji Kitatani
    • 1
  • Takahiro Kozuka
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyKinki Central HospitalKami City HyogoJapan
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyKansai Rosai HospitalHyogoJapan
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyOsaka University Medical SchoolOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations