GeoJournal

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 133–144 | Cite as

Spatial growth and spatial rationalization in multi-plant enterprises

  • Healey M. J. 
Article

Abstract

This paper analyses the spatial growth and rationalization behaviour, over a six year period, of a representative sample of 64 multi-plant enterprises in the United Kingdom textile and clothing industries, and illustrates the findings with case studies. The companies which expanded outside their home region for the first time, did so as frequently by long distance growth as by short distance, and by opening branch plants as well as by acquiring firms. By far the most common spatial rationalization policy was plant closure combined with concentration of production on an existing site. A new concept of activity locations is proposed as a useful tool for designing and assessing spatial rationalization policies.

Keywords

Environmental Management Representative Sample Short Distance Activity Location Paper Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bloomfield, G. T.: The Locational Evolution of an Automotive Firm: Rolls Royce of Derby. East Midland Geographer 6, 309–327 (1977)Google Scholar
  2. Bloomfield, G. T.: The Changing Spatial Organisation of Multinational Corporations in the World Automotive Industry. In: Hamilton, F. E. I., Linge, G. J. R. (eds.), Spatial Analysis, Industry and the Industrial Environment, Vol. 2 — International Industrial Systems, pp. 357–394, John Wiley, Chichester 1981.Google Scholar
  3. Brady, R. A.: The Meaning of Rationalisation: an Analysis of the Literature. Quarterly Journal of Economics 46, 526–540 (1932)Google Scholar
  4. Brady, R. A.: The Rationalisation Movement in German Industry: A Study in the Evolution of Economic Planning. University of California Press, Berkeley 1933.Google Scholar
  5. Berry, C. H.: Corporate Bigness and Diversification in Manufacturing. Ohio State Law Journal 28, 402–426 (1967)Google Scholar
  6. Chandler, A. D.: Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. MIT Press, Cambridge 1962.Google Scholar
  7. Chapman, K.: Corporate Systems in the United Kingdom Petrochemical Industry. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 64, 126–137 (1974)Google Scholar
  8. Cummins, E.: A Case Study in Rationalisation. The Textile Weekly, 29 July and 5 August (1966)Google Scholar
  9. Dicken, P.: The Multi-plant Business Enterprise and Geographical Space: Some Issues in the Study of External Control and Regional Development. Regional Studies, 10, 401–412 (1976)Google Scholar
  10. Fleming, D.; Krumme, G.: The Royal-Hoesch Union: Case Analysis of Adjustment Patterns in the European Steel Industry. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 59, 177–199 (1968)Google Scholar
  11. Gilmour, J.M.: External Economies of Scale, Inter-industrial Linkages and Decision-Making in Manufacturing. In: Hamilton, F.E.I. (ed.) Spatial Perspectives on Industrial Organisation and Decision Making, pp. 335–362, John Wiley, London 1974.Google Scholar
  12. Gwinner, C.: Hard Tasks Mr. Weinstock Still Faces. Financial Times 11 March (1968)Google Scholar
  13. Håkanson, L.: Towards a Theory of Location and Corporate Growth. In: Hamilton, F.E.I., Linge, G.J.R. (eds.), Spatial Analysis, Industry and the Industrial Environment, Vol. 1 — Industrial Systems, pp. 115–138, John Wiley, Chichester 1979.Google Scholar
  14. Hamilton, F.E.I.: Aspects of Industrial Mobility in the British Economy. Regional Studies, 12, 153–165 (1978)Google Scholar
  15. Hayter, R.: Corporate Strategies in Industrial Change in the Canadian Forest Product Industries. Geographical Review, 66, 209–228 (1976)Google Scholar
  16. Hayter, R.: Locational Decision-making in a Resource Based Manufacturing Sector: Case Studies from the Pulp and Paper Industry of British Columbia. Professional Geographer XXX, 240–249 (1978)Google Scholar
  17. Hayter, R.; Watts, H. D.: The Geography of Enterprise: A Reappraisal. Progress in Human Geography (Forthcoming)Google Scholar
  18. Healey, M. J.: Changes in the Location of Production in Multi-plant Enterprises, with Particular Reference to the United Kingdom Textile and Clothing Industries, 1967–72. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield 1979.Google Scholar
  19. Healey, M. J.: Locational Adjustment and the Characteristics of Manufacturing Plants, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, N.S., 6, 394–412 (1981a)Google Scholar
  20. Healey, M. J.: Product Changes in Multi-plant Enterprises, Geoforum 12, 359–370 (1981b)Google Scholar
  21. Healey, M. J.: Plant Closures in Multi-plant Enterprises — the Case of a Declining Industrial Sector. Regional Studies 16, 37–51 (1982)Google Scholar
  22. Healey, M. J.: Components of Locational Change in Multi-plant Enterprises. Urban Studies 20 (3), (1983a)Google Scholar
  23. Healey, M. J. (ed.): Urban and Regional Industrial Research: The Changing Data Base in Britain. Geo Books, Norwich 1983b.Google Scholar
  24. Hood, N.; Young, S.: Multinationals in Retreat: The Scottish Experience. Edinbugh University Press, Edinburgh 1982.Google Scholar
  25. Jansen, A.C.M.: Elementan van een Vestigingsplaatsmodel voor Industriele ‘Multi-plant’ Ondernemingen, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 65, 174–192 (1974)Google Scholar
  26. Krumme, G.: The Interregional Corporation and the Region: a Case Study of Siemens' Growth Characteristics and Response Patterns in Munich, West Germany. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 61, 318–333 (1970)Google Scholar
  27. Krumme, G.: Making it Abroad: the Evolution of Volkswagen's North American Production Plans. In: Hamilton, F.E.I.; Linge, G.J.R. (eds.), Spatial Analysis, Industry and the Industrial Environment, Vol. 2 — International Industrial Systems, pp. 329–356, John Wiley, Chichester 1981a.Google Scholar
  28. Krumme, G.: Flexibility Views in Industrial Location and Location Decision Theory. In: Rees, J.; Hewings, G.J.D.; Stafford, H.A. (eds.), Industrial Location and Regional Systems, pp. 107–121, Croom Helm, London 1981b.Google Scholar
  29. Krumme, G.; Hayter, R.: Implications of Corporate Strategies and Product Cycle Adjustments for Regional Employment Changes. In: Collins, L., Walker, D.F. (eds.), Locational Dynamics of Manufacturing Activity, pp. 325–356, John Wiley, London 1975.Google Scholar
  30. Laulajainen, R.: Temporal Hierarchy of the Corporate Space. GeoJournal (1982)Google Scholar
  31. LeHeron, R.B.: The Diversified Corporation and Development Policy: New Zealand's Experience. Regional Studies 14, 201–218 (1980)Google Scholar
  32. Lloyd, P.E.; Dicken, P.: Location in Space: a Theoretical Approach to Economic Geography. Harper and Row, London 1977.Google Scholar
  33. McNee, R.B.: A Systems Approach of Understanding the Geographic Behaviour of Organisations, Especially Large Corporations. In: Hamilton, F.E.I. (ed.), Spatial Perspectives on Industrial Organisation and Decision Making, pp. 47–75, John Wiley, London 1974.Google Scholar
  34. Massey, D.B.; Meegan, R.A.: The Geography of Industrial Reorganisation: the Spatial Effects of the Restructuring of the Electrical Engineering Sector under the Industrial Reorganisation Corportation. Progress in Planning 10, 155–237 (1979)Google Scholar
  35. Massey, D.; Meegan, R.: The Anatomy of Job Loss: the How, Why and Where of Employment Decline. Methuen, London 1982.Google Scholar
  36. North, D.J.: The Process of Locational Change in Different Manufacturing Organisations. In: Hamilton, F.E.I. (ed.), Spatial Perspectives on Industrial Organisation and Decision Making, pp. 213–245, John Wiley, London 1974.Google Scholar
  37. Prais, S.J.: The Evolution of Giant Firms in Britain. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1976.Google Scholar
  38. Rake, D.J.: The Economic Geography of the Multilocational Industrial Firm with Special Reference to the East Midlands. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham 1972.Google Scholar
  39. Starbuck, W.: Organisational Growth and Development. In: March, J.G. (ed.), Handbook of Organisations, pp. 451–522, Penguin Harmondsworth 1971.Google Scholar
  40. Steed, G.P.F.: Internal Organisation, Firm Integration and Location Change, 1954–64, Economic Geography 3, 371–383 (1971)Google Scholar
  41. Taylor, M.J.: Organisational Growth, Spatial Interaction and Location Decision-making, Regional Studies 9, 313–323 (1975)Google Scholar
  42. Urwick, L.: The Meaning of Rationalisation. Nisbet, London 1929.Google Scholar
  43. Valtz, R.C.K.: The Case of the Multi-plant Manufacturer. Harvard Business Review 42, March–April, 12–30, 176–182 (1964)Google Scholar
  44. Wadley, D.A.: Enterprises in Trouble: the Geography of Wholesaling in the Australian Agricultural Machinery Industry, 1967–72. In: Hamilton, F.E.I.; Linge, G.J.R. (eds.), Spatial Analysis, Industry and the Industrial Environment, Vol. 1 — Industrial Systems, pp. 187–211, John Wiley, Chichester 1979.Google Scholar
  45. Watts, H.D.: Spatial Rationalisation in Multi-plant Enterprises, Geoforum 17, 69–76 (1974)Google Scholar
  46. Watts, H.D.: The Market Area of a Firm. In: Collins, L.; Walker, D.F. (eds.), Locational Dynamics of Manufacturing Activity, pp. 357–383, John Wiley, London 1975.Google Scholar
  47. Watts, H.D.: Market Areas and Spatial Rationalization: the British Brewing Industry after 1945. Tijdschrift voor Econmische en Sociale Geografie 68, 224–240 (1977)Google Scholar
  48. Watts, H.D.: The Large Industrial Enterprise: Some Spatial Perspectives. Croom Helm, London 1980.Google Scholar
  49. Whitman, E.S.; Schmidt, W.J.: Plant Relocation: a Case History of a Move. American Management Association, New York 1966.Google Scholar
  50. Wood, P.A.: Priorities in Industrial Location Research. Social Science Research Council, London 1978.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Healey M. J. 
    • 1
  1. 1.Coventry (Lanchester) PolytechnicCoventryEngland

Personalised recommendations