New evidence for the intermediate position of relaxed accommodation
- 126 Downloads
- 105 Citations
Abstract
Experimental evidence is presented that the focus of the eye tends to return passively to an individually characteristic intermediate resting position or dark-focus whenever (1) the stimulus to accommodation is degraded or (2) when the quality of the image is independent of focus. Based on measurements of the dark-focus with a laser optometer, it is possible to predict the magnitude of night, empty field, and instrument myopia on an individual basis. The role of the intermediate dark-focus as a factor in accommodation also provides an explanation for the paradoxical variation of visual acuity with observation distance. Applications to night myopia and night driving are described, and implications for clinical practice are discussed.
Key words
Accommodation laser optometer anomalous myopiasPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Alpern, M. Variability of accommodation during steady fixation at various levels of luminance. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 48: 193–197 (1958).Google Scholar
- Allen, M.J. Vision and Highway Safety. Chilton, Philadelphia (1970).Google Scholar
- Baldwin, W.R. & W.B. Stover. Observation of laser standing wave patterns to determine refractive status. Am. J. Optom. 45: 143–150 (1968).Google Scholar
- Bouman, M.A. & G. van den Brink. On night myopia. Ophthalmologica 123: 100–113 (1952).Google Scholar
- Campbell, F.W. & J.A.E. Primrose. The state of accommodation of the human eye in darkness. Trans. Ophthal. Soc. U.K. 73: 353–361 (1953).Google Scholar
- Charman, W.N. On the position of the plane of stationarity in laser refraction. Am. J. Optom. 51: 832–838 (1974).Google Scholar
- Cogan, D.G. Accommodation and the autonomic nervous system. Arch. Ophthal. 18: 739–766 (1937).Google Scholar
- Freeman, E. Anomalies of visual acuity in relation to stimulus distance. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 22: 285–292 (1932).Google Scholar
- Heath, G.G. The influence of visual acuity on accommodative responses of the eye. Am. J. Optom. 33: 513–524 (1956).Google Scholar
- Helmholtz, H.V. Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik I. Hamburg, Voss, 1909. Physiological Optics, Vol. I. Reprinted, New York: Dover, (1962).Google Scholar
- Hennessy, R.T. Instrument Myopia. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 65 (1975).Google Scholar
- Hennessy, R.T. & H.W. Leibowitz. Subjective measurement of accommodation with laser light. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 60: 1700–1701 (1970).Google Scholar
- Hennessy, R.T. & H.W. Leibowitz. Laser optometer incorporating the Badal principle. Beh. Res. Meht. & Instr. 4: 237–239 (1972).Google Scholar
- Hennessy, R.T., T. Iida, K. Shina & H.W. Leibowitz. The effect of pupil size on accommodation. Vision Research 16: 587–590 (1976).Google Scholar
- Ingelstam, E. & S.I. Ragnarsson. Eye refraction examined by the aid of speckle pattern produced by coherent light. Vision Research 12: 411–420 (1972).Google Scholar
- Jayle, G.E., A.G. Purgaud, L.F. Baisinger & W.J. Holmes. Night Vision. Springfield, Ill., Thomas (1959).Google Scholar
- Johnson, C.A. Effects of luminance and stimulus distance on accommodation and visual resolution. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66: 138–142 (1976).Google Scholar
- Knoll, H.A. A brief history of ‘nocturnal myopia’ and related phenomena. Amer. J. Optom. 29: 69–81 (1952).Google Scholar
- Knoll, H.A. Measuring ametropia with a gas laser: a preliminary report. Amer. J. Optom. 43: 415–418 (1966).Google Scholar
- Kooman, M., R. Scolnik & R. Tousey. A study of night myopia. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 41: 80–90 (1951).Google Scholar
- Leibowitz, H.W. & D.A. Owens, Night myopia and the intermediate dark focus of accommodation. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 65: 1121–1128 (1975a).Google Scholar
- Leibowitz, H.W. & D.A. Owens. Anomalous myopias and the intermediate dark focus of accommodation. Science 189: 646–648 (1975b).Google Scholar
- Levene, J.R. Nevil Maskelyne, F.R.S. and the discovery of night myopia. Roy. Soc. Lond. Notes and Reports 20: 100–108 (1965).Google Scholar
- Luckiesh, M. & F.K. Moss. Functional adaptation to near vision. J. Exp. Psychol. 26: 352–356 (1940).Google Scholar
- Luckiesh, M. & F.K. Moss. The plus-power bias in static refraction. Am. J. Optom. 18: 313–317 (1941).Google Scholar
- Mellerio, J. Ocular refraction at low luminance. Vision Research 6: 217–237 (1966).Google Scholar
- Morgan, M.W. A new theory for the control of accommodation. Am. J. Optom. 23: 99–110 (1946).Google Scholar
- Morgan, M.W. The resting state of accommodation. Am. J. Optom 34: 347–353 (1957).Google Scholar
- Otero, J.M. Influence of the state of accommodation on the visual performance of the human eye. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 41: 942–948 (1957).Google Scholar
- Owens, D.A. & H.W. Leibowitz. Night myopia: Cause and a possible basis for amelioration. Am. J. Optom. & Physiol. Optics 53: 709–717 (1976).Google Scholar
- Post, R.B., R.L. Owens, D.A. Owens & H.W. Leibowitz. Correction of empty field myopia on the basis of the dark-focus of accommodation. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. (In press).Google Scholar
- Reese, E.E. & G.A. Fry. The effect of fogging lenses on accommodation. Am. J. Optom. 18: 9–16 (1941).Google Scholar
- Richards, O.W. Night myopia at night automobile driving luminances. Amer. J. Optom. 44: 517–523 (1967).Google Scholar
- Schober, H.A.W. Über die Akkommodationsruhelage. Optik 11: 282–290 (1954a).Google Scholar
- Schober, H.A.W. Strongest plus and weakest minus lens, an old rule — its meaning and its limitations. Optical Journal Review 91: 27–28 (1954b).Google Scholar
- Schober, H.A.W. Das Sehen (II). VEB Fachbuchverlag, Leipzig (1964).Google Scholar
- Schober, H.A.W., H. Dehler & R. Kassel. Accommodation during observations with optical instruments. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 60: 103–107 (1970).Google Scholar
- Westheimer, G. Accommodation measurements in empty visual fields. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 47: 714–718 (1957).Google Scholar
- Whiteside, T.C.D. Accommodation of the human eye in a bright and empty field. J. Physiol. (London) 118: 65 (1952).Google Scholar