Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 31–39 | Cite as

Brood guarding and the evolution of male parental care in burying beetles

  • Michelle Pellissier Scott


Parental behavior that has an impact on the increased survival of offspring, an important factor in the evolution of parental care, can include both guarding and provisioning. The effects of these two components of parental care can be separated and quantified in the burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis in which both male and female cooperate to rear young. Although in the absence of competition, reproductive success is reduced by the presence of the second parent in the brood chamber, two parents dramatically reduce the probability that conspecifics will usurp the resource, replace either the male or female, kill the newly hatched brood, and produce a replacement clutch. After the establishment of the burial chamber (but not before) beetles appear to assist their mates in driving off intrasexual competitors. Male assistance in burial does not account for very much of the variance in the speed in which the carcass can be concealed nor are two parents essential to guard against insect predators. There were no significant differences in the duration of parental care by males paired with virgin and non-virgin females suggesting that paternity of the brood for which the male provides care is not a factor determining the length of care. Since male and female reproductive success is limited in Nicrophorus by access to suitable carcasses, many of the typical asymmetries in the costs and benefits of parental care are lacking. However since sperm displacement is not complete, paternity of the replacement clutch, for which the male does not provide care, may be a factor encouraging male desertion before female desertion. Other factors important in the evolution of paternal care, especially the probability of additional reproductive opportunities, are discussed.


Reproductive Success Parental Behavior Parental Care Brood Chamber Paternal Care 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bartlett J (1987) Filial cannibalism in burying beetles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:179–183Google Scholar
  2. Barlett J (1988) Male mating success and paternal care in Nicrophorus vespilloides (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:297–303Google Scholar
  3. Bartlett J, Ashworth CM (1988) Brood size and fitness in Nicrophorus vespilloides (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:429–434Google Scholar
  4. Grafen A, Sibley R (1978) A model of mate desertion. Anim Behav 26:645–652Google Scholar
  5. Maynard Smith J (1977) Parental investment: a prospective analysis. Anim Behav 25:1–9Google Scholar
  6. Milne LJ, Milne M (1976) The social behavior of burying beetles. Sci Am 235:84–89Google Scholar
  7. Müller JK, Eggert AK (1989) Paternity assurance by “helpful” males: adaptations to sperm competition in burying beetles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:245–249Google Scholar
  8. Pukowski E (1933) Okologische Untersuchungen an Necrophorus F. Z Morphol Okol 27:518–586Google Scholar
  9. Scott MP (1989) Male parental care and reproductive success in the burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis. J Insect Behav 2:133–137Google Scholar
  10. Scott MP, Traniello JFA (1987) Behavioral cues trigger ovarian development in the burying beetle Nicrophorus tomentosus. J Insect Physiol 33:693–696Google Scholar
  11. Scott MP, Traniello JFA (in press) Behavioural and ecological correlates of male and female parental care and reproductive success in burying beetles (Nicrophorus spp.). Anim BehavGoogle Scholar
  12. Tallamy DW, Wood TK (1986) Convergence patterns in subsocial insects. Ann Rev Entomol 31:369–390Google Scholar
  13. Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  14. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago, IL (pp 136–179)Google Scholar
  15. Trumbo S (1987) Behavioral ecology of parental care in burying beetles (Silphidae: Nicrophorus). PhD thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NCGoogle Scholar
  16. Werren JH, Gross MR, Shine R (1980) Paternity and the evolution of male parental care. J Theor Biol 82:619–631Google Scholar
  17. Wilson DS, Fudge J (1984) Burying beetles: intraspecific interactions and reproductive success in the field. Ecol Entomol 9:195–203Google Scholar
  18. Wilson DS, Knollenberg WG, Fudge J (1984) Species packing and temperature dependent competition among burying beetles (Silphidae, Nicrophorus). Ecol Entomol 9:205–216Google Scholar
  19. Zeh DW, Smith RL (1985) Paternal investment by terrestrial arthropods. Am Zool 25:785–805Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michelle Pellissier Scott
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations