Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 53–61 | Cite as

MRI in venous thromboembolic disease

  • H. D. Sostman
  • J. F. Debatin
  • C. E. Spritzer
  • R. E. Coleman
  • T. M. Grist
  • J. R. MacFall
Original Articles Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

We evaluated the ability of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to detect deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). MR venography was performed on 217 patients suspected of having DVT. Cine-MR imaging of the pulmonary arteries was performed in 14 other patients who were thought to have PE based on other imaging studies. In a third group of 5 patients, MR pulmonary angiograms were performed in the sagittal and coronal planes with a multislice fast gradient recalled echo technique. All but one of the 217 MR venograms were technically adequate. In 72 patients with correlative imaging studies (venography and ultrasound) MR venography was 99% sensitive and 95% specific. On the basis of follow-up (mean 8.3 months), no false-negative MR venograms were detected in an additional 64 patients. In 11 other patients MR revealed a diagnosis other than DVT. Cine-MR showed PE in all 14 patients evaluated. MR pulmonary arteriography demonstrated filling defects consistent with acute PE in 2 of 3 patients with acute PE; in the third patient only a questionable filling defect was seen. Coarctations or webs were found in the pulmonary arteries of both patients with chronic PE. These preliminary data suggest that MR imaging may be able to evaluate both the peripheral venous and the pulmonary arterial component of venous thromboembolic disease. Further technical refinement and more extensive clinical experience will be required to establish the role of this method in diagnosing pulmonary embolism, but MR venography is now used routinely in our hospital for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis.

Key words

MR venography Pulmonary embolism Pulmonary MR angiography Venous thromboembolic disease 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pope CF, Sostman HD (1988) Venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. In: Putman CE, Ravin CE (eds) Textbook of diagnostic imaging. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 584–604Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hull RD, Hirsh J, Carter CJ et al. (1983) Pulmonary angiography, ventilation lung scanning and venography for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism with abnormal perfusion lung scan. Ann Intern Med 98: 891–899Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spritzer CE, Sostman HD, Wilkes DC, Coleman RE (1990) Deep venous thrombosis: experience with gradient-echo MR imaging in 66 patients. Radiology 177: 235–241Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Erdman WA, Jayson HT, Redman HC, Miller GL, Parkey RW, Peshock RW (1990) Deep venous thrombosis of the extremities: role of MR imaging in the diagnosis. Radiology 174: 425–431Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Simel DL, Feussner JR, DeLong ER, Matchar DB (1987) Intermediate, indeterminate and uninterpretable diagnostic test results. Med Decis Making 7: 107–114Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Posteraro RH, Sostman HD, Spritzer CE, Herfkens RJ (1989) Cine-gradient refocused MRI of central pulmonary emboli. AJR 152: 465–468Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    MacFall JR, Grist TM, Sostman HD, Foo TKF (1991) Multiple thick-slice, arterial or venous suppressed rapid MR pulmonary angiography. Proc SMRM 10: 211Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dunnick NR, Sostman HD (1991) Pulmonary thromboembolic disease. In: Elliot LP (ed) Cardiac imaging in infants children and adults. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 891–905Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schuman LM (1965) The epidemiology of thromboembolic disorders: a review. J Chron Dis 18: 815–845Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Freiman DG, Suyemoto J, Wessler S (1965) Frequency of pulmonary thromboembolism in man. N Engl J Med 290: 1278–1286Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dalen JE, Alpert JS (1975) Natural history of pulmonary embolism. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 17: 259–270Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rogers LQ, Lutcher CL (1990) Streptokinase therapy for deep venous thrombosis: a comprehensive review of the English literature. Am J Med 88: 389–395Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kakkar VV (1975) Deep venous thrombosis: detection and prevention. Circulation 51: 8–12Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Landefeld CS, McGuire E, Cohen AM (1990) Clinical findings associated with acute proximal deep venous thrombosis: a basis for quantifying clinical judgement. Am J Med 88: 382–388Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    PIOPED investigators (1990) Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. JAMA 263: 2753–2759Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hull R, Hirsh J, Sackett DL et al. (1981) Clinical validity of a negative venogram in patients with clinically suspected venous thrombosis. Circulation 64: 622–625Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Redman HC (1988) Deep venous thrombosis: is contrast venography still the diagnostic “gold standard”? Radiology 168: 277–278Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    McLachlan MSF, Thomson JG, Taylor DW, Kelly ME, Sackett DL (1979) Observer variation in the interpretation of lower limb venograms. AJR 132: 227–229Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bettmann MA, Robbins A, Braun SD, Wetzner S, Dunnick NR, Finkelstein J (1987) Contrast venography of the leg: diagnostic efficacy, tolerance and complication rates with ionic and non-ionic contrast media. Radiology 165: 113–116Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lensing AWA, Prandoni P, Buller HR, Casara D, Cogo A, Wouter ten Cate J (1990) Lower extrimity venography with iohexol: results and complications. Radiology 177: 503–505Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lensing AWA, Prandoni P, Brandjes D et al. (1989) Detection of deep-vein thrombosis by real-time B-mode ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 320: 342–345Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vaccaro JP, Cronan JC, Dorfman GS (1990) Outcome analysis of patients with normal compression US examinations. Radiology 175: 645–649Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yucel EK, Fisher JS, Egglin TK, Geller SC, Waltman AC (1991) Isolated calf venous thrombosis: diagnosis with compression US. Radiology 179: 443–446Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Murphy TP, Cronan JJ (1990) Evolution of deep venous thrombosis: a prospective evaluation with US. Radiology 177: 543–548Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gomes AS, Webber MM, Buffkin D (1982) Contrast venography vs radionuclide venography: a study of discrepancies and their possible significance. Radiology 142: 719–728Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hull R, Hirsh J, Sackett DL et al. (1981) Replacement of venography in suspected venous thrombosis by impedance plethysmography and 125I-fibrinogen leg scanning. Ann Intern Med 94: 12–15Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ezekowitz MD, Pope CF, Sostman HD et al. (1986) In-111 platelet scintigraphy for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. Circulation 73: 668–674Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alavi A, Palevsky HI, Gupta N et al. (1990) Radiolabelled antifibrin antibody in the detection of venous thrombosis: preliminary results. Radiology 175: 79–85Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Totterman S, Francis CW, Foster TH, Brenner B, Marder VJ, Bryant RG (1990) Diagnosis of femoropopliteal venous thrombosis with MR imaging: a comparison of four MR pulse sequences. AJR 154: 175–178Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gehl V, Bohndorf K, Gunther RW (1990) MR-angiographic der tiefen Bein- und Beckenvenenthrombose: Vergleich mit der Phlebographie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 153: 654–657Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vukov LF, Berquist TH, King BF (1991) Magnetic resonance imaging for calf deep venous thrombosis. Ann Emerg Med 20: 497–499Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hricak H, Thoeni RF, Carroll PR, Demas BE, Marotti M, Tanagho EA (1988) Detection and staging of renal neoplasms: a reassessment of MR imaging. Radiology 166: 643–649Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hansen ME, Spritzer CE, Sostman HD (1990) Assessing the patency of mediastinal and thoraic inlet veins: value of MR imaging. AJR 155: 1177–1182Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Genkins SM, Sostman HD, Spritzer CE et al. (1988) Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis: comparison of venography with four noninvasive techniques. Radiology 169 (P): 206Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gottschalk A, Greenspan RH (1990) PIOPED, the multicenter national prospective trial relating V/Q scan diagnosis of PE to pulmonary angiographic diagnoses: technique, methodology and results. Radiology 177 (P): 51 (Presented at RSNA, 1990)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gamsu G, Hirji M, Moore EH, Webb WR, Brito A (1984) Experimental pulmonary emboli detected using magnetic resonance. Radiology 153: 467–470Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pope CF, Sostman HD, Carbo P, Gore JC, Holcomb W (1987) The detection of pulmonary emboli by MRI: evaluation of imaging parameters. Invest Radiol 22: 937–946Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    White RD, Winkler ML, Higgins CB (1987) MR imaging of pulmonary 15–21 arterial hypertension and pulmonary emboli. AJR 149:Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. D. Sostman
    • 1
  • J. F. Debatin
    • 1
  • C. E. Spritzer
    • 1
  • R. E. Coleman
    • 1
  • T. M. Grist
    • 2
  • J. R. MacFall
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations