Performance of a hybrid anaerobic reactor, combining a sludge blanket and a filter, treating slaughterhouse wastewater
- 114 Downloads
- 17 Citations
Abstract
A column reactor, in which the bottom two-thirds were occupied by a sludge blanket and the upper one-third by submerged clay rings, was evaluated using slaughterhouse wastewater as substrate. The reactor was operated at 35°C at loading rates varying from 5 g to 45 g chemical oxygen demand (COD) 1−1 × day−1 at an influent concentration of 2450 mg COD 1−1. A maximum substrate removal rate of 32 g COD 1−1 × day−1, coupled with a methane production rate of 6.91 × 1−1 × day−1 (STP), was obtained. This removal rate is significantly higher than those previously reported. The rate of substrate utilization by the biomass was 1.22 g COD (g volatile suspended solids)−1 day−1. COD removal was over 96% with loading rates up to 25 g COD 1−1 × day−1, at higher loading rates performance decreased rapidly. It was found that the filter element of the reactor was highly efficient in retaining biomass, leading to a biomass accumulation yield coefficient of 0.029 g volatile suspended solids g−1 COD, higher than reported previously for either upflow anaerobic sludge-blanket reactors or anaerobic filters operating independently.
Keywords
Chemical Oxygen Demand Removal Rate Chemical Oxygen Demand Removal Volatile Suspended Solid Anaerobic ReactorPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- American Public Health Association (APHA) (1989) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 17th edn. APHA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Borja R, Martín A, Alonso V (1992) Influence of the microorganism support on the kinetics of anaerobic fermentation of condensation water from thermally concentrated olive mill wastewater. Biodegradation 3:93–103Google Scholar
- Borja R, Durán MM, Martín A (1993) Influence of the support on the kinetics of anaerobic purification of slaughterhouse wastewater. Biores Technol 44:57–60Google Scholar
- Bull MA, Steritt RM, Lester JN (1983) The influence of COD, hydraulic, temperature and pH shocks on the stability of an unheated fluidized bed reactor. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 33B:221–230Google Scholar
- Bull MA, Steritt RM, Lester JN (1984) Developments in anaerobic treatment of high strength industrial wastewaters. Chem Eng Res Design 62:203–212Google Scholar
- Campos JR, Foresti E, Camacho RPD (1986) Anaerobic wastewater treatment in the food processing industry: two cases studies. Water Sci Technol 18:87–97Google Scholar
- Chudoba J, Hruby J (1989) Nitrogen removal from rendering-plant wastewater by nitrification and dentrification. Vodni Hospod [B] 39:225–229Google Scholar
- Edeline F (1980) L' épuration biologique des eaux résiduaires. Cebedoc, LiègeGoogle Scholar
- Gariepy S, Tyagi RD, Couillard D, Tran F (1989) Aerobic process for protein recovery as an alternative to slaughterhouse wastewater treatment. Biol Wastes 29:93–105Google Scholar
- Guiot SR, Podruzny MF, McLean DD (1989) Assessment of macroenergetic parameters for an anaerobic upflow biomass bed and filter (UBF) reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 34:1277–1288Google Scholar
- Hulshoff Pol LW, Lettinga G (1986) New technologies for anaerobic wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 18:41–53Google Scholar
- Jeris J (1983) Industrial wastewater treatment using anaerobic fluidized bed reactors. Water Sci Technol 15:169–176Google Scholar
- Lawrence AW, McCarty PL (1969) Kinetics of methane fermentation in anaerobic treatment. J Water Pollut Control Fed 41:R1-R16Google Scholar
- Li CT, Hwu NT, Whang JS (1984) Treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater by biofiltration tower. In: Bandy JT (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Fixed-film Biological Processes. US Army Corps Engineering Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Champaign, IllGoogle Scholar
- Metzner G, Temper U (1990) Operation and optimization of a full-scale fixed-bed reactor for anaerobic digestion of animal rendering wastewater. Water Sci Technol 22:373–384Google Scholar
- Mosey FE (1981) Methane fermentation of organic wastes. Trib Cebedeau 34:389–400Google Scholar
- Pérez JL, Carretero MI, Maqueda C (1989) Behaviour of sepiolite, vermiculite and montmorillonite as supports in anaerobic digesters. Appl Clay Sci 4:69–82Google Scholar
- Sayed S, De Zeeuw W (1988). The performance of a continuously operated flocculent sludge UASB reactor with slaughterhouse wastewater. Biol Wastes 24:199–212Google Scholar
- Sayed S, De Zeeuw W, Lettinga G (1984) Anaerobic treatment of slaughterhouse waste using a flocculant sludge UASB reactor. Agric Wastes 11:197–226Google Scholar
- Sayed S, Van Campen L, Lettinga G (1987) Anaerobic treatment of slaughterhouse waste using a granular sludge UASB reactor. Biol Wastes 21:11–28Google Scholar
- Stephenson T, Lester JN (1986) Evaluation of startup and operation of four anaerobic processes treating a synthetic meat waste. Biotechnol Bioeng 28:372–380Google Scholar
- Suhrkamp I, Jannsen S (1989) Degradation of high fat concentrations in a mixture of cattle manure and slaughterhouse wastewater by means of a methanogenic mixed culture. DECHEMA Biotechnology Conference. t B. Biochemical Engineering, Environmental Biotechnology, Recovery Bio-production Saf Biotechnology. pp 871–875Google Scholar
- Tritt WP (1992a) Methanization of wastes from slaughterhouse and meat processing. Korresp Abwasser 39:1656–1658Google Scholar
- Tritt WP (1992b) The anaerobic treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater in fixed-bed reactors. Bioresource Technol 41:201–207Google Scholar
- Zheng Y, Wu W (1984) A study of meat packing plant wastewater treatment with upflow anaerobic sludge blanket process. In: Shanghai Bioenergy Engineering Corp. (eds) Proceedings of the 4th Anaerobic Digestion International Symposium. Shanghai. pp 227–237Google Scholar