Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 351–357 | Cite as

Performance of a hybrid anaerobic reactor, combining a sludge blanket and a filter, treating slaughterhouse wastewater

  • R. Borja
  • C. J. Banks
  • Z. Wang
Environmental Biotechnology Original Paper

Abstract

A column reactor, in which the bottom two-thirds were occupied by a sludge blanket and the upper one-third by submerged clay rings, was evaluated using slaughterhouse wastewater as substrate. The reactor was operated at 35°C at loading rates varying from 5 g to 45 g chemical oxygen demand (COD) 1−1 × day−1 at an influent concentration of 2450 mg COD 1−1. A maximum substrate removal rate of 32 g COD 1−1 × day−1, coupled with a methane production rate of 6.91 × 1−1 × day−1 (STP), was obtained. This removal rate is significantly higher than those previously reported. The rate of substrate utilization by the biomass was 1.22 g COD (g volatile suspended solids)−1 day−1. COD removal was over 96% with loading rates up to 25 g COD 1−1 × day−1, at higher loading rates performance decreased rapidly. It was found that the filter element of the reactor was highly efficient in retaining biomass, leading to a biomass accumulation yield coefficient of 0.029 g volatile suspended solids g−1 COD, higher than reported previously for either upflow anaerobic sludge-blanket reactors or anaerobic filters operating independently.

Keywords

Chemical Oxygen Demand Removal Rate Chemical Oxygen Demand Removal Volatile Suspended Solid Anaerobic Reactor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Public Health Association (APHA) (1989) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 17th edn. APHA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Borja R, Martín A, Alonso V (1992) Influence of the microorganism support on the kinetics of anaerobic fermentation of condensation water from thermally concentrated olive mill wastewater. Biodegradation 3:93–103Google Scholar
  3. Borja R, Durán MM, Martín A (1993) Influence of the support on the kinetics of anaerobic purification of slaughterhouse wastewater. Biores Technol 44:57–60Google Scholar
  4. Bull MA, Steritt RM, Lester JN (1983) The influence of COD, hydraulic, temperature and pH shocks on the stability of an unheated fluidized bed reactor. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 33B:221–230Google Scholar
  5. Bull MA, Steritt RM, Lester JN (1984) Developments in anaerobic treatment of high strength industrial wastewaters. Chem Eng Res Design 62:203–212Google Scholar
  6. Campos JR, Foresti E, Camacho RPD (1986) Anaerobic wastewater treatment in the food processing industry: two cases studies. Water Sci Technol 18:87–97Google Scholar
  7. Chudoba J, Hruby J (1989) Nitrogen removal from rendering-plant wastewater by nitrification and dentrification. Vodni Hospod [B] 39:225–229Google Scholar
  8. Edeline F (1980) L' épuration biologique des eaux résiduaires. Cebedoc, LiègeGoogle Scholar
  9. Gariepy S, Tyagi RD, Couillard D, Tran F (1989) Aerobic process for protein recovery as an alternative to slaughterhouse wastewater treatment. Biol Wastes 29:93–105Google Scholar
  10. Guiot SR, Podruzny MF, McLean DD (1989) Assessment of macroenergetic parameters for an anaerobic upflow biomass bed and filter (UBF) reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 34:1277–1288Google Scholar
  11. Hulshoff Pol LW, Lettinga G (1986) New technologies for anaerobic wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 18:41–53Google Scholar
  12. Jeris J (1983) Industrial wastewater treatment using anaerobic fluidized bed reactors. Water Sci Technol 15:169–176Google Scholar
  13. Lawrence AW, McCarty PL (1969) Kinetics of methane fermentation in anaerobic treatment. J Water Pollut Control Fed 41:R1-R16Google Scholar
  14. Li CT, Hwu NT, Whang JS (1984) Treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater by biofiltration tower. In: Bandy JT (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Fixed-film Biological Processes. US Army Corps Engineering Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Champaign, IllGoogle Scholar
  15. Metzner G, Temper U (1990) Operation and optimization of a full-scale fixed-bed reactor for anaerobic digestion of animal rendering wastewater. Water Sci Technol 22:373–384Google Scholar
  16. Mosey FE (1981) Methane fermentation of organic wastes. Trib Cebedeau 34:389–400Google Scholar
  17. Pérez JL, Carretero MI, Maqueda C (1989) Behaviour of sepiolite, vermiculite and montmorillonite as supports in anaerobic digesters. Appl Clay Sci 4:69–82Google Scholar
  18. Sayed S, De Zeeuw W (1988). The performance of a continuously operated flocculent sludge UASB reactor with slaughterhouse wastewater. Biol Wastes 24:199–212Google Scholar
  19. Sayed S, De Zeeuw W, Lettinga G (1984) Anaerobic treatment of slaughterhouse waste using a flocculant sludge UASB reactor. Agric Wastes 11:197–226Google Scholar
  20. Sayed S, Van Campen L, Lettinga G (1987) Anaerobic treatment of slaughterhouse waste using a granular sludge UASB reactor. Biol Wastes 21:11–28Google Scholar
  21. Stephenson T, Lester JN (1986) Evaluation of startup and operation of four anaerobic processes treating a synthetic meat waste. Biotechnol Bioeng 28:372–380Google Scholar
  22. Suhrkamp I, Jannsen S (1989) Degradation of high fat concentrations in a mixture of cattle manure and slaughterhouse wastewater by means of a methanogenic mixed culture. DECHEMA Biotechnology Conference. t B. Biochemical Engineering, Environmental Biotechnology, Recovery Bio-production Saf Biotechnology. pp 871–875Google Scholar
  23. Tritt WP (1992a) Methanization of wastes from slaughterhouse and meat processing. Korresp Abwasser 39:1656–1658Google Scholar
  24. Tritt WP (1992b) The anaerobic treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater in fixed-bed reactors. Bioresource Technol 41:201–207Google Scholar
  25. Zheng Y, Wu W (1984) A study of meat packing plant wastewater treatment with upflow anaerobic sludge blanket process. In: Shanghai Bioenergy Engineering Corp. (eds) Proceedings of the 4th Anaerobic Digestion International Symposium. Shanghai. pp 227–237Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Borja
    • 1
  • C. J. Banks
    • 2
  • Z. Wang
    • 2
  1. 1.Instituto de la Grasa y sus Derivados (CSIC)SevillaSpain
  2. 2.Environmental Technology Centre, Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology (UMIST)ManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations