For collecting informed public opinions a special kind of questionnaire has been developed: the Choice Questionnaire. With this questionnaire, information relating to a decision problem is made available to respondents. This information includes the various options from which a choice has to be made, and the consequences of these options. The Choice Questionnaire also contains a procedure that is designed to assist participants in processing this information and in making a choice based on it.
This paper studies the extent to which the Choice Questionnaire is a useful instrument for collecting informed opinions and the effects the instrument has on the decision-making process of the participants. The factors influencing its performance are also considered. This evaluation study has been carried out in a real life context: the choice made by the Dutch population concerning the further application of nuclear power.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Beckwith, N.E. & D.R. Lehmann (1975) The importance of halo effects in multi-attribute attitude models. Journal of Marketing Research 12: 265–275.
Bishop, Y.M.M., S.E. Fienberg, & P.W. Holland (1975) Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Converse, P.E. (1964) The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apler (ed.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press.
Edwards, W. (1977) Use of multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making. In D.E. Bell, R.L. Keeney, & H. Raiffa (eds.). Conflicting Objectives in Decisions. New York: Wiley.
Hagenaars, J.A.P. (1985) Loglineaire analyse van herhaalde surveys. Panel-, trend-, en cohortonderzoek. PhD dissertation, University of Brabant.
Keeney, R.L. & H. Raiffa (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.
Neijens, P. (1987) The Choice Questionnaire. Design and Evaluation of an Instrument for Collecting Informed Opinions of a Population. Amsterdam: Free University Press.
Neijens, P., J.A. de Ridder, & W.E. Saris (1988) Variation in response functions and prescription for information integration. In W.E. Saris (ed.), Variation in Response Behavior: A Source of Measurement Error in Attitude Research. Amsterdam: Sociometric Research Foundation.
Slovic, P. & D. MacPhillamy (1974) Dimensional commensurability and cue utilization in comparative judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 11: 172–194.
Verba, S. & N.H. Nie (1972) Participation in America. New York: Harper and Row.
About this article
Cite this article
Neijens, P., De Ridder, J.A. & Saris, W.E. An instrument for collecting informed opinions. Qual Quant 26, 245–258 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172428
- Real Life
- Decision Problem
- Public Opinion
- Evaluation Study
- Special Kind