Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 179–186 | Cite as

An experimental study of song type function in the bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus)

  • Michael S. Capp
  • William A. Searcy
Article

Summary

We tested the hypothesis that the alpha and beta songs of male bobolinks (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) have separate intrasexual and intersexual functions by presenting caged males and caged females on the territories of male bobolinks. Although all males in our study population share both alpha and beta songs, we found no evidence for a specialized intersexual function of alpha song or a specialized intrasexual function of beta song. Territorial males increased their singing rate of both alpha and beta songs during both the male presentations and the female presentations. The proportions of the two song types did not change between control and experimental periods for either male or female presentations. We found no evidence in support of specialized intrasexual and intersexual functions of note types. Only 10% of the vocalizations initiated by territorial males were complete alpha or beta songs, while 87% were song fragments, and the remaining 3 % were compound songs. We did find that territorial males responded to simulated male intruders by increasing the proportion of fragmented songs and decreasing the proportion of compound songs. Moreover, males included fewer notes per song initiated and sang a higher proportion of songs that included only introductory notes during male presentations. We conclude that the vocal response of territorial male bobolinks to conspecific male intruders is to sing short, simple sequences of either song type. We found no consistent changes in vocal behavior of territorial males in response to female presentations other than increases in song rates.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avery M, Oring L (1977) Song dialects in bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus). Condor 79:113–118Google Scholar
  2. Baptista L (1978) Territorial, courtship, and duet songs of the Cuban grassquit (Tiaris canora). J Ornithol 119:91–101Google Scholar
  3. Catchpole CK (1973) The functions of advertising song in the sedge warbler (Acrocephalus schoenobeanus) and the reed warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus). Behaviour 46:300–320Google Scholar
  4. Catchpole CK (1983) Variation in the song of the great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) in relation to mate attraction and territorial defense. Anim Behav 31:1217–1225Google Scholar
  5. Catchpole CK (1986) The biology and evolution of bird songs. Perspect Biol 30:47–62Google Scholar
  6. Catchpole CK, Dittami J, Leisler B (1984) Differential responses to male song repertoires in female songbirds implanted with oestradiol. Nature 312:563–564Google Scholar
  7. Catchpole CK, Leisler B, Dittami J (1986) Sexual differences in the responses of captive great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus to variation in song structure and repertoire size. Ethology 73:69–77Google Scholar
  8. Cosens SE, Sealy SG (1986) Age-related variation in song repertoire size and repertoire sharing of yellow warblers (Dendroica petechia). Can J Zool 64:1926–1929Google Scholar
  9. Ficken MS, Ficken FW (1965) Comparative ethology of the chestnut sided warbler, yellow warbler, and American redstart. Wilson Bull 77:363–375Google Scholar
  10. Ficken MS, Ficken RW (1970) Response of four warbler species to playback of their two song types. Auk 87:296–304Google Scholar
  11. Isaac D, Marler P (1963) Ordering of sequences of singing behavior of mistle thrushes in relationship to timing. Anim Behav 11:179–188Google Scholar
  12. Lein MR (1972) Territorial and courtship songs of birds. Nature 237:48–49Google Scholar
  13. Lein MR (1978) Song variation in a population of chestnut sided warblers (Dendroica pensylvanica): its nature and suggested function. Can J Zool 56:1266–1283Google Scholar
  14. Lemon RE, Cotter R, MacNally RC, Monette S (1985) Song repertoires and song sharing by American redstarts. Condor 87:457–470Google Scholar
  15. Martin SG (1967) Breeding biology of the Bobolink. MS thesis, University of Wisconsin, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  16. Martin SG (1974) Adaptations for polygynous breeding in the Bobolink, Dolichonyx oryzivorus. Am Zool 14:109–119Google Scholar
  17. Morse DH (1966) The context of songs in the yellow warbler. Wilson Bull 78:444–445Google Scholar
  18. Morse DH (1967) The contexts of song in blackthroated green and blackburnian warblers. Wilson Bull 79:64–74Google Scholar
  19. Morse DH (1970) Territorial and courtship songs of birds. Nature 226:48–49Google Scholar
  20. Rohlf FJ, Sokal RR (1981) Statistical tables, 2nd edn. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Searcy WA, Yasukawa K (1990) Use of the song repertoire in intersexual and intrasexual contexts by male red-winged black-birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:123–128Google Scholar
  22. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith RL (1959) The songs of the grasshopper sparrow. Wilson Bull 71:141–152Google Scholar
  24. Smith WJ (1965) Message, meaning and context in ethology. Am Nat 908:405–409Google Scholar
  25. Stacier CA (1989) Characteristics, use, and significance of two singing behaviors in Grace's warbler (Dendroica graciae). Auk 106:49–63Google Scholar
  26. Wittenberger JF (1978) The breeding biology of an isolated Bobolink population in Oregon. Condor 80:126–137Google Scholar
  27. Wittenberger JF (1983) A contextual analysis of two song variants in the bobolink. Condor 85:172–184Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael S. Capp
    • 1
  • William A. Searcy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences and Pymatuning Laboratory of EcologyUniversity of PittsburghLinesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations