Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 191–199 | Cite as

Promiscuity: an inbreeding avoidance mechanism in a socially monogamous species?

  • M. G. Brooked
  • I. Rowley
  • M. Adams
  • P. R. Baverstock
Article

Summary

Paternity likelihood was tested in a population of splendid fairy-wrens Malurus splendens by allozyme electrophoresis. A total of 91 offspring of 24 dams and 37 putative sires were typed at 10 polymorphic loci. All young were compatible with their dams but at least 65% were not fathered by any of the males in their group. A long-term study of this wren population has shown that the males are sedentary, show little evidence of dispersal and help care for the nestlings and fledglings in their group. Had the senior male sired all the offspring in his group, there would have been a high incidence of close inbreeding. The promiscuous mating system demonstrated here would reduce the level of inbreeding in the population but still allow individuals the security of group-living in a stable year-round territory.

Keywords

Mating System Polymorphic Locus Avoidance Mechanism Monogamous Species Allozyme Electrophoresis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baverstock PR, Adams M, Polkinghorne R, Gelder M (1982) A sex-linked enzyme in birds - Z-chromosome conservation but no dosage compensation. Nature 296:763–766Google Scholar
  2. Birkhead TR (1988) Behavioral aspects of sperm competition in birds. Adv Study Behav 18:35–72Google Scholar
  3. Birkhead TR, Atkin L, Moller AP (1987) Copulation behaviour in birds. Behaviour 101:101–133Google Scholar
  4. Brodsky LM (1988) Mating tactics of male rock ptarmigan, Lagopus mutus: a conditional mating strategy. Anim Behav 36:335–342Google Scholar
  5. Brown JL (1987) Helping and communal breeding in birds: ecology and evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  6. Ford NL (1983) Variation in mate fidelity in monogamous birds. Curr Ornithol 1:329–356PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Harris H, Hopkinson DA (1976) Handbook of enzyme electrophoresis in human genetics. North Holland Publishing Co., OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson MS, Brown JL (1980) Genetic variation among trait groups and apparent absence of close inbreeding in grey-crowned babbler. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:93–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Richardson BJ, Baverstock PR, Adams M (1986) Allozyme electrophoresis: a handbook for animal systematics and population studies. Academic Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  10. Rowley I (1981) The communal way of life in the splendid wren, (Malurus splendens). Z Tierpsychol 55:228–267Google Scholar
  11. Rowley I (1983) Re-mating in birds. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Rowley I, Russell EM, Brooker MG (1986) Inbreeding: benefits may outweigh costs. Anim Behav 34:939–941Google Scholar
  13. Russell E, Rowley I (1988) Helper contributions to reproductive success in the splendid fairy-wren, (Malurus splendens). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:131–140Google Scholar
  14. Sherman PW, Morton ML (1988) Extra-pair fertilizations in mountain white-crowned sparrows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:413–420Google Scholar
  15. Swofford DL, Selander RB (1981) BIOSYS-1: a FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. J Hered 72:281–283Google Scholar
  16. Tidemann SC (1981) The behavioural ecology of three coexisting fairy-wrens (Maluridae:Malurus). PhD thesis, Australian National University, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  17. Trivers RL (1972) Paternal investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Heinemann, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Westneat DF (1987) Extra-pair fertilizations in a predominantly monogamous bird: genetic evidence. Anim Behav 35:877–886Google Scholar
  19. Wolfson A (1952) The cloacal protuberance. Bird-banding 23:158–165Google Scholar
  20. Wrege PH, Emlen ST (1987) Biochemical determination of paternal uncertainty in white-fronted bee-eaters. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:153–160Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. G. Brooked
    • 1
  • I. Rowley
    • 1
  • M. Adams
    • 2
  • P. R. Baverstock
    • 2
  1. 1.CSIRO Division of Wildlife and EcologyMidlandAustralia
  2. 2.Evolutionary Biology UnitSouth Australian MuseumAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations