Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 111–119 | Cite as

Aggressive mimicry, prey-specific predatory behaviour and predator-recognition in the predator-prey interactions of Portia fimbriata and Euryattus sp., jumping spiders from Queensland

  • Robert R. Jackson
  • R. Stimson Wilcox


Adults and large juveniles of Queensland Portia fimbriata, a salticid spider known to prey on other spiders (including other salticids), are shown to use prey-specific predatory behaviour against Euryattus sp., one of the salticids on which it feeds. Euryattus females are unusual because they nest inside suspended rolled-up leaves. P. fimbriata used vibratory displays to lure Euryattus females from their nests. These displays seem to mimic the courtship displays of Euryattus males. Other species of Portia and other populations of P. fimbriata, in habitats in which Euryattus is not known to occur, did not practise this prey-specific behaviour. In the laboratory, Euryattus — but not Jacksonoides queenslandica, another salticid on which P. fimbriata is known to feed — readily recognized approaching Portia as a potential predator. A possible ‘evolutionary arms race’ between Portia and Euryattus is discussed.


Potential Predator Predatory Behaviour Courtship Display Large Juvenile Aggressive Mimicry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blest AD (1985) Fine structure of spider photoreceptors in relation to function. In: Barth FG (ed) Neurobiology of arachnids. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 79–102Google Scholar
  2. Curio E (1976) The ethology of predation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Drees O (1952) Untersuchungen über die angeborenen Verhaltensweisen bei Springspinnen (Salticidae). Z Tierpsychol 9:169–207Google Scholar
  4. Forster LM (1982) Vision and prey-catching strategies in jumping spiders. Am Sci 70:165–175Google Scholar
  5. Freed A (1984) Foraging behaviour in the jumping spider Phidippus audax: basis for selectivity. J Zool Lend 203:23–48Google Scholar
  6. Jackson RR (1985) The biology of Euryattus sp. indet., a web-building jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae) from Queensland: utilization of silk, predatory behaviour and intraspecific interactions. J Zool Lend (B) 1:145–173Google Scholar
  7. Jackson RR (1988) The biology of Jacksonoides queenslandica, a jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae) Queensland: intraspecific interactions, web-invasions, predators, and prey. NZ J Zool 15:1–37Google Scholar
  8. Jackson RR, Blest AD (1982a) The biology of Portia fimbriata, a web-building jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae) from Queensland: utilization of webs and predatory versatility. J Zool Lond 196:255–293Google Scholar
  9. Jackson RR, Blest AD (1982b) The distances at which a primitive jumping spider, Portia fimbriata, makes visual discriminations. J Exp Biol 97:441–445Google Scholar
  10. Jackson RR, Hallas SEA (1986a) Comparative biology of Portia africana, P. albimana, P, fimbriata, P. labiata, and P. schultzi, araneophagic, web-building jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae): utilisation of webs, predatory versatility, and intraspecific interactions. NZ J Zool 13:423–489Google Scholar
  11. Jackson RR, Hallas SEA (1986b) Capture efficiencies of web-building jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae): is the jackof-all-trades the master of none? J Zool Lond (A) 209:1–7Google Scholar
  12. Land MF (1985) The morphology and optics of spider eyes. In: Barth FG (ed) Neurobiology of arachnids. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 53–78Google Scholar
  13. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225Google Scholar
  14. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  15. Wanless FR (1978) A revision of the spider genus Portia (Araneae: Salticidae). Bull Br Mus (Nat Hist), Zool 34:83–124Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert R. Jackson
    • 1
  • R. Stimson Wilcox
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of CanterburyChristchurch 1New Zealand
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesState University of New York at BinghamtonBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations