Time-reduced T2-weighted celebral MRI with optimized flip angles
- 38 Downloads
Abstract
This study was set up to see whether lowering the flip angle in proton density- and T2-weighted double-spin echo sequences allows for shortening of repetition time (TR) and imaging time without significant change of image quality. Ten patients with celebral white matter lesions were investigated with an 1.5 T MR scanner using a conventional long- TR double-spin echo sequence (TR = 2500 ms, TE = 15 and 70 ms) and reduced-TR double-spin echo sequences (TR = 1900 ms, TE = 15 and 70 ms) at flip angles of 90°, 80°, 70°, 60°, and 50°. Lowering the flip angle resulted in less T1-contrast and a relative increase of T2-contrast. At a flip angle of 70°, contrast-to noise ratios (NNRs) between lesions and brain, as well as image artifacts of the reduced-TR sequence (CNR: 22.4) were similar to the conventional long-TR sequence (CNR:21.1), while imaging time was shortened by about 25%.
Key words
Magnetic resonance imaging Nuclear magnetic resonance Central nervous systemPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Brant-Zawadzki M (1988) MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 166: 1–10Google Scholar
- 2.Wehrli FW, MacFall JR, Shutts D, Berger R, Herfkens RJ (1984) Mechanisms of contrast in NMR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8: 369–380Google Scholar
- 3.Mills TC, Ortendahl DA, Hylton NM, Crooks LE, Carlson JW, Kaufman L (1987) Partial flip angle MR imaging. Radiology 162: 531–539Google Scholar
- 4.Winkler ML, Ortendahl DA, Mills TC, Crooks LE, Sheldon PE, Kaufmann L, Kramer DM (1988) Characteristics of partial flip angle and gradient reversal MR imaging. Radiology 166: 17–26Google Scholar
- 5.Hackney DB, Lenkinski RE, Grossman RI, Zimmerman RA, Goldberg HI, Bilaniuk LT, Young SC, Nowell MA, Kemp SS (1988) Initial experience with fast-low angle multiecho (FLAME) imaging of the central nervous system. J Comput Assist Tomogr 12: 171–174Google Scholar
- 6.Mills TC, Ortendahl DA, Hylton NM, Carlson JW, Crooks LE, Kaufmann L (1987) Variable flip angle excitation for reduced acquisition time magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 34: 304–306Google Scholar
- 7.Mitchell DG, Vinitski S, Burk DL, Levy D, Rifkin MD (1989) Variable-flip-angle spin-echo MR imaging of the pelvis: More versatile T2-weighted images. Radiology 171: 525–529Google Scholar
- 8.Tkach J, Haacke M (1988) A comparison of fast spin echo and gradient field echo sequences. Magn Reson Imag 6: 373–378Google Scholar
- 9.Kaufmann L, Kramer DM, Crooks LE, Ortendahl DA (1989) Measuring signal-to-noise ratios in MR imaging. Radiology 173: 265–267Google Scholar
- 10.Kanal E, Wehrli FW (1989) Signal-to-noise ratio, resolution, and contrast. In: Wehrli FW, Shaw D, Kneeland JB (eds) Biomedical magnetic resonance imaging. VCH, New York, pp 47–114Google Scholar
- 11.Bottomley PA, Hardy CJ, Argersinger RE, Allen-Moore G (1987) A review of H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in pathology: Are T1 and T2 diagnostic? Med Phys 14: 1–37Google Scholar
- 12.Bishop JE, Plewes DB (1990) A new multi-slice technique based on TE-interleaving. Book of abstracts, Soc Magn Reson Med: 437Google Scholar