Space Science Reviews

, Volume 78, Issue 1–2, pp 289–296

Recent results on the parameters of the interstellar helium from the ULYSSES/GAS experiment

  • M. Witte
  • M. Banaszkiewicz
  • H. Rosenbauer
The Local Interstellar Medium

Abstract

Velocity and direction of the flow of the interstellar helium and its temperature and density have been determined from the measurements of the ULYSSES/GAS experiment for two different epochs: during the in-ecliptic path of ULYSSES, representing solar maximum conditions, and during the south to the north pole transition (11/94-6/95), close to the solar minimum conditions. Within the improved error bars the values are consistent with results published earlier.

The determination of the density n∞ of the interstellar helium at the heliospheric boundary from observations in the inner solar system requires knowledge about the loss processes experienced by the particles on their way to the observer. The simultaneous observation of the helium particles arriving on “direct” and “indirect” orbits at the observer provides a tool to directly determine the effects of the loss processes assumed to be predominantly photoionization and — for particles travelling close to the Sun — electron impact ionization by high-energy solar wind electrons.

Such observations were obtained with the ULYSSES/GAS instrument in February 1995, before the spaceprobe passed its perihelion. From these measurements values for the loss rates and the interstellar density could be derived. Assuming photoionization to be the only loss process reasonable fits to the observations were obtained for an ionization rate β = 1.1 · 10−7 s−1 and a density n∞ ≈ 1.7 · 10−2 cm−3. Including, in addition, electron impact ionization, a photoionization β = 0.6 · 10−7 s−1 was sufficient to fit both observations, resulting in a density n∞ ≈ 1.4 · 10−2 cm−3.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banaszkiewicz M., Witte M., Rosenbauer H.: 1996, Astron. Astrophys., Suppl. Ser., in press.Google Scholar
  2. Bertaux J.L. and Blamont J.E.: 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 11, 200.Google Scholar
  3. Bertaux J.L., Kyrölä E.: 1995, Quémerais E., et al., Solar Physics 162, Nos. 1–2, 403.Google Scholar
  4. Chassefière E., Bertaux J.L., Lallement R., Kurt V.G.: 1986, Astron. Astrophys. 160, 229.Google Scholar
  5. Chassefière E., Dalaudier F., Bertaux J.L.: 1988, Astron. Astrophys. 201, 113.Google Scholar
  6. Cummings A.C. and Stone E.: 1196, Space Sci. Rev., this issue.Google Scholar
  7. Dalaudier F., Bertaux J.L., Kurt V.G., Mironova E.N.: 1984, Astron. Astrophys. 134, 171.Google Scholar
  8. Geiss J. and Witte M.: 1996, Space Sci. Rev., this issue.Google Scholar
  9. Gloeckler G.: 1996, Space Sci. Rev., this issue.Google Scholar
  10. Lallement R.: 1996, Space Sci. Rev., this issue.Google Scholar
  11. Möbius E., Hovestadt D., Klecker B., Scholer M., Gloeckler G. Ipavich M.: 1985, Nature 318, 426.Google Scholar
  12. Möbius E., Rucinski D., Hovestadt D., Klecker B.: 1995, Astron. Astrophys. 304, 505.Google Scholar
  13. Pryor W.R., Barth C.A., Hord C.W., et al.: 1995, Geophys. Res. Letters, submitted.Google Scholar
  14. Rucinski D. and Fahr H.J.: 1989, Astron. Astrophys. 224, 280.Google Scholar
  15. Rucinski D., Cummings A.C., Gloeckler G., Lazarus A.J., Möbius E., and Witte M.: 1996, Space Sci. Rev., this issue.Google Scholar
  16. Thomas G.E. and Krassa R.F.: 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 11, 218.Google Scholar
  17. Witte M., Rosenbauer H., Keppler E., Fahr H., Hemmerich P., Lauche H., Loidl A., Zwick R.: 1992, Astron. Astrophys., Suppl. Ser. 92, 333.Google Scholar
  18. Witte M., Rosenbauer H., Banaszkiewicz M.: 1993, Adv. Space Res. 13, (6)121.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Witte
    • 1
  • M. Banaszkiewicz
    • 1
  • H. Rosenbauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für AeronomieKatlenburg-LindauGermany

Personalised recommendations