Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 31, Issue 6, pp 393–400 | Cite as

Social organization of woodchucks (Marmota monax)

  • Paul T. Meier
Article

Summary

The social organization of woodchucks (Marmota monax) in southeast Ohio was studied at two sites, at one for two 2 years (1979–1980) and the other for 3 years (1981–1983). Spatial organization was determined by trapping and radio tracking. The home ranges of adult females did not overlap in the early spring but during late spring and summer there was some overlap (<10%) as females expanded their home ranges. Adult females tended to occupy the same home range in consecutive years. Some adult males occupied well-defined home ranges that did not overlap the home ranges of other males but did overlap extensively the home range of one to three adult females. These males tended to occupy the same home range in consecutive years. Infants used the same home range of their dam until about 2–3 months of age when most males and females apparently dispersed. About 35% of the juvenile females did not disperse until their second spring, just before their mother's new litter first emerged from their burrow. The average social group consisted of an adult male with two female kin groups comprising an adult female, an offspring (usually female) of the previous year, and the young of the year. Interactions within the kin group and with the adult male were relatively frequent and generally amicable. Interactions between kin groups both within and between different social groups were relatively rare and agonistic. The social organization of woodchucks in Ohio differs from that described in previous studies of woodchucks elsewhere and from that predicted by current models proposed by others on the evolution of social organization of marmots.

Keywords

Social Organization Home Range Adult Male Social Group Adult Female 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anthony M (1962) Activity and behavior of the woodchuck in southern Illinois. Occas Pap CC Adams Center Ecol Studies 6:1–25Google Scholar
  2. Armitage KB (1962) Social behavior of a colony of the yellow-bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris). Anim Behav 10:319–331Google Scholar
  3. Armitage KB (1981) Sociality as a life-history tactic of ground squirrels. Oecologia 48:36–49Google Scholar
  4. Armitage KB (1984) Recruitment in yellow-bellied marmot populations: kinship, philopatry and individual variability. In: Murie JO, Michener GR (eds) Biology of ground-dwelling squirrels. Univ of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp 375–403Google Scholar
  5. Armitage KB (1986) Marmot polygyny revisited: determinants of male and female reproductive strategies. In: Rubenstein DS, Wrangham RW (eds) Ecology of social evolution: field studies of birds and mammals. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, pp 303–331Google Scholar
  6. Armitage KB (1988) Resources and social organization of ground-dwelling squirrels. In: Slobodchikoff CN (ed) The ecology of social behavior. Academic Press, New York, pp 131–155Google Scholar
  7. Armitage KB, Downhower JF (1974) Demography of yellow-bellied marmot populations. Ecology 55:1233–1245Google Scholar
  8. Armitage KB, Johns DW (1982) Kinship, reproductive strategies and social dynamics of yellow-bellied marmots. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:55–63Google Scholar
  9. Armitage KB, Downhower JF, Svendsen GE (1976) Seasonal changes in the weights of marmots. Am Midi Nat 96:36–51Google Scholar
  10. Arnold W (1990a) The evolution of marmot sociality: I. Why disperse late? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:229–237Google Scholar
  11. Arnold W (1990b) The evolution of marmot sociality: II. Costs and benefits of joint hibernation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:239–246Google Scholar
  12. Barash DP (1973) The social behavior of the Olympic marmot. Anim Behav Monogr 6:171–249Google Scholar
  13. Barash DP (1974a) The evolution of marmot societies: a general theory. Science 85:415–420Google Scholar
  14. Barash DP (1974b) The social behavior of the hoary marmot (Marmota caligata). Anim Behav 22:256–261Google Scholar
  15. Barash DP (1989) Marmots, social behavior and ecology. Stanford Univ Press, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  16. Bronson FH (1963) Some correlates of interaction rates in natural populations of woodchucks. Ecol 44:637–644Google Scholar
  17. Bronson FH (1964) Agonistic behavior of woodchucks. Anim Behav 12:470–478Google Scholar
  18. Brown JL, Orians GH (1970) Spacing behavior in mobile animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1:239–262Google Scholar
  19. Davis DE (1981) Mechanism for decline in a woodchuck population. J Wildl Manage 45:658–668Google Scholar
  20. Downhower JF, Armitage KB (1981) Dispersal of yearling yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris). Anim Behav 29:1064–1069Google Scholar
  21. Elliot PF (1975) Longevity and the evolution of polygamy. Am Nat 109:281–287Google Scholar
  22. Ferron J, Quellet JP (1989) Temporal and intersexual variations in use of space in regard to social organization in the woodchuck (Marmota monax). Can J Zool 67:1642–1649Google Scholar
  23. Grizzell RA (1955) A study of the southern woodchuck Marmota monax monax. Am Midi Nat 53:257–293Google Scholar
  24. Hamilton WJ (1934) The life history of the rufescent woodchuck. Ann Carnegie Mus 23:85–178Google Scholar
  25. Meier PT (1985) Behavioral ecology, social organization and mating system of woodchucks (Marmota monax) in southeast Ohio. Ph D Diss, Ohio Univ, Athens, OhioGoogle Scholar
  26. Michener GR (1983) Kin identification, matriarchies, and the evolution of sociality in ground dwelling sciurids. In: Eisenberg J, Kleiman D (eds) Recent advances in mammalian behavior. (Spec Publ Amer Soc Mammal 7) pp 528–571Google Scholar
  27. Snyder RL, Christian JJ (1960) Reproductive cycle and litter size in the woodchuck. Ecology 41:647–656Google Scholar
  28. Snyder RL, Davis DE, Christian JJ (1961) Seasonal changes in the weights of woodchucks. J Mammal 42:297–312Google Scholar
  29. Vos A de, Gellespie DI (1960) A study of woodchucks on an Ontario farm. Can Field Nat 74:140–145Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul T. Meier
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Zoological and Biomedical SciencesOhio UniversityAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations