Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 350–353 | Cite as

Kinetic study on the β-glucosidase-catalysed reaction of Trichoderma viride cellulase

  • Miguel A. Montero
  • Antonio Romeu
Biochemical Engineering

Abstract

A kinetic study of the β-glucosidase-catalysed reaction of a commercial cellulase preparation from Trichoderma viride is described. The Km and Vmax values of the β-glucosidase system were: (a) 0.5 mm and 6.6 μmol/min, respectively, using p-nitrophenyl β-d-glucopyranoside (pNPG) as substrate; and (b) 2.5 mm and 8.1 μmol/min, respectively, using cellobiose as subtrate. The glucose effect on initial reaction velocity agrees with a mixed-inhibition pattern. The inhibition constant (Ki) values were, 0.53 and 0.39 mm with nNPG and cellobiose as substrates, respectively. The temperature and pH optima were determined.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aubert JP, Beguin P, Millet J (1988) Biochemistry of cellulose degradation. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Béguin P (1990) Molecular biology of cellulose degradation. Annu Rev Microbiol 44:219–248Google Scholar
  3. Beldman G, Searle-Van Leeuwen MF, Rombouts FM, Voragen FGJ (1985) The cellulase of Trichoderma viride. Eur J Biochem 146:301–308Google Scholar
  4. Brown RD, Jurasek L (1978) Hydrolysis of cellulose: mechanism of enzymatic and acid catalysis. American Chemical Society, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  5. Dixon M, Webb E (1979) Enzymes. 3rd edn. Longman, London, pp 353–355Google Scholar
  6. Enari TM, Niku-Paavola ML (1987) Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: is the current theory of the mechanism of hydrolysis valid? CRC Crit Rev Biotechnol 5:67–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ghose TK (1987) Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 59:257–268Google Scholar
  8. Godfrey T, Reichelt J (1986) Industrial enzymology. Stocton Press, New York, pp 47–51Google Scholar
  9. Halliwell G, Griffin M (1973) The nature and mode of action of the cellulolytic component C1 of Trichoderma koningii on native cellulose. Biochem J 135:587–599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Knowles J, Lehtovaara P, Teeri T (1987) Cellulase families and their genes. Trends Biotechnol 5:255–261Google Scholar
  11. Stockton BC, Mitchell DJ, Grohmann K, Himmel ME (1991) Optimum β-d-glucosidase supplementation of cellulase for efficient conversion of cellulose to glucose. Biotechnol Lett 13:57–62Google Scholar
  12. Tanaka A, Sugiura M, Hotta T, Kurata H, Ishihara Y (1989) Steady-state inhibitory kinetic studies on almond β-glucosidase-catalyzed reaction—Binding sites of monosaccarides. Agric Biol Chem 53:1401–1405Google Scholar
  13. Wood TM, McCrae SI, Bhat M (1989) The mechanism of fungal cellulase action. Biochem J 260:37–43Google Scholar
  14. Wood WA, Kellogg ST (1988) Biomass. Methods Enzymol 160:424–431Google Scholar
  15. Woodward J, Marquess HJ, Picker CS (1986) Affinity chromatography of β-glucosidase from Aspergillus niger on concanavalin A-sepharose: implications for cellulose component purification and immobilization. Prep Biochem 16:337–352Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miguel A. Montero
    • 1
  • Antonio Romeu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering and BiochemistryUniversity of BarcelonaTarragonaSpain

Personalised recommendations