Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 87–91 | Cite as

Mate sampling behaviour of female pied flycatchers: evidence for active mate choice

  • Svein Dale
  • Trond Amundsen
  • Jan T. Lifjeld
  • Tore Slagsvold


This paper presents major new evidence for active mate choice of female pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca. Fifteen color-ringed females were released into a study area containing 23 unmated males defending one nestbox each. Through intensive surveillance, the behavior of the females was observed during 2 consecutive days. Twenty-two of the males received a total of 131 female visits. Six of the females settled in the study area, and their premating period lasted 1.3–2.5 days. The females were seen searching for mates for at least 6–32 h and were seen visiting at least 1–9 different males. Hence, some of the females rejected males before mating. Nevertheless, the females settled close to the site of release (range: 16–243 m), suggesting that they mated with one of the first males encountered. Females visited males most frequently in the morning, and the diurnal distribution of visits was significantly correlated with male song activity.


Defend Active Mate Mate Choice Mate Sampling Pied Flycatcher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Glynn C (1986) Female pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics. Nature 323:152–153Google Scholar
  2. Alatalo RV, Carlson A, Lundberg A (1988) The search cost in mate choice of the pied flycatcher. Anim Behav 36:289–291Google Scholar
  3. Arak A (1988) Female mate selection in the natterjack toad: active choice or passive attraction? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:317–327Google Scholar
  4. Dale S, Slagsvold T (1990) Random settlement in female pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca: significance of male territory size. Anim Behav 39:231–243Google Scholar
  5. Gottlander K (1987) Variation in the song rate of the male pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca: causes and consequences. Anim Behav 35:1037–1043Google Scholar
  6. Haartman L von (1956) Territory in the pied flycatcher Muscicapa hypoleuca. Ibis 98:460–475Google Scholar
  7. Halliday TR (1983) The study of mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–32Google Scholar
  8. Janetos AC (1980) Strategies of female mate choice: a theoretical analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:107–112Google Scholar
  9. Kirkpatrick M (1987) The evolutionary forces acting on female preferences in polygynous animals. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, Chichester, pp 67–82Google Scholar
  10. Lifjeld JT, Slagsvold T (1988) Female pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca choose male characteristics in homogeneous habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:27–36Google Scholar
  11. Schantz T von, Göransson G, Andersson G, Froberg I, Grahn M, Helgee A, Wittzell H (1989) Female choice selects for a viability-based male trait in pheasants. Nature 337:166–169Google Scholar
  12. Slagsvold T (1986) Nest site settlement by the pied flycatcher: does the female choose her mate for the quality of his house or himself? Ornis Scand 17:210–220Google Scholar
  13. Slagsvold T (1987) Nest site preference and clutch size in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Ornis Scand 18:189–197Google Scholar
  14. Slagsvold T, Lifjeld JT (1986) Mate retention and male polyterritoriality in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:25–30Google Scholar
  15. Slagsvold T, Lifjeld JT (1988) Ultimate adjustment of clutch size to parental feeding capacity in a passerine bird. Ecology 69:1918–1922Google Scholar
  16. Slagsvold T, Lifjeld JT, Stenmark G, Breiehagen T (1988) On the cost of searching for a mate in female pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim Behav 36:433–442Google Scholar
  17. Wittenberger JF (1983) Tactics of mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 435–447Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Svein Dale
    • 1
  • Trond Amundsen
    • 1
  • Jan T. Lifjeld
    • 1
  • Tore Slagsvold
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoological MuseumUniversity of OsloOslo 5Norway

Personalised recommendations