Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 36, Issue 5, pp 357–365 | Cite as

Extra-pair paternity, sperm competition and the evolution of testis size in birds

  • A. P. Moller
  • J. V. Briskie
Article

Abstract

Sperm competition should select for increased sperm production if the probability of fertilization by a specific male is proportional to the relative number of sperm inseminated. A review of the literature generally supports the predicted positive association between sperm production or allocation and various measures of the presumed intensity of sperm competition. However, it is not clear how increased sperm competition is related to extra-pair paternity, and it remains unknown whether certainty of paternity should be associated with relative testis size. Based on a large sample of bird species with information on extra-pair paternity gathered from the literature, we demonstrate that testis mass is related positively to the level of extra-pair paternity, after controlling for body size and phylogeny. Although large testes may be necessary to avoid sperm depletion in species in which males frequently engage in multi-pair copulations, we argue that selection has favoured increased testis mass in situations of more intense sperm competition in order to retaliate against copulations by rival males. The fact the males are not always successful in retaliating against rival ejaculates further suggests that females may largely control the allocation of paternity in birds and that increased sperm production by males may simply be a male strategy to make the best of a bad situation.

Key words

Birds Extra-pair paternity Testis mass Sperm competition Control of paternity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alatalo RV, Gustafsson L, Lundberg A (1984) High frequency of cuckoldry in pied and collared flycatchers. Oikos 42:41–47Google Scholar
  2. Alatalo RV, Gustafsson L, Lundberg A (1989) Extra-pair paternity and heritability estimates of tarsus length in pied and collared flycatchers. Oikos 56:54–58Google Scholar
  3. Birkhead TR, Fletcher F (1992) Sperm to spare? Sperm allocation by male zebra finches. Anim Behav 43:1053–1055Google Scholar
  4. Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1992) Sperm competition in birds: evolutionary causes and consequences. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Birkhead TR, Pellatt J, Hunter FM (1988) Extra-pair copulation and sperm competition in the zebra finch. Nature 334:60–62Google Scholar
  6. Birkhead TR, Burke T, Zann R, Hunter FM, Krupa AP (1990) Extra-pair paternity and intraspecific brood parasitism in wild zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:315–324Google Scholar
  7. Birkhead TR, Hatehwell BJ, Davies NB (1991) Sperm competition and the reproductive organs of the male and female dunnock Prunella modularis. Ibis 133:306–311Google Scholar
  8. Birkhead TR, Briskie JV, Moller AP (1993) Male sperm reserves and copulation frequency in birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32: 85–93Google Scholar
  9. Blakey JK (1989) Biochemical and population genetics in the great tit (Parus major). DPhil thesis, University of OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Bollinger EK, Gavin TA (1991) Patterns of extra-pair fertilizations in bobolinks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:1–7Google Scholar
  11. Briskie JV (1993a) Anatomical adaptations to sperm competition in Smith's longspurs and other polygynandrous passerines. Auk 110:875–888Google Scholar
  12. Briskie JV (1993b) Smith's longspur. In: Poole A, Stettenheim P, Gill F (eds) The birds of North America (no. 34). Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia and American Ornithologists' Union, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  13. Briskie JV, Montgomerie R (1993) Patterns of sperm storage in relation to sperm competition in passerine birds. Condor 95: 442–454Google Scholar
  14. Brooker MG, Rowley I, Adams M, Baverstock PR (1990) Promiscuity: an inbreeding avoidance mechanism in a socially monogamous species? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:191–199Google Scholar
  15. Brown CR, Brown MB (1988) Genetic evidence of multiple parentage in broods of cliff swallows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23: 379–387Google Scholar
  16. Brownell RL Jr, Ralls K (1986) Potential for sperm competition in baleen whales. Rep Int Whaling Commission (special issue) 8:97–112Google Scholar
  17. Burke T (1989) DNA fingerprinting and other methods for the study of mating success. Trends Ecol Evol 4:139–144Google Scholar
  18. Burke T, Davies NB, Bruford MW, Hatchwell BJ (1989) Parental care and mating behaviour of polyandrous dunnocks Prunella modularis related to paternity by DNA fingerprinting. Nature 338:249–251Google Scholar
  19. Burt A (1989) Comparative methods using phylogenetically independent contrasts. In: Harvey PH, Partridge L (eds) Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology, vol 6. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 33–53Google Scholar
  20. Cartar RV (1985) Testis size in sandpipers: the fertilization frequency hypothesis. Naturwissenschaften 72:157–158Google Scholar
  21. Glutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer: behaviour and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  22. Compton MM, Van Krey HP, Siegel PB (1978) The filling and emptying of the uterovaginal sperm-host glands in the domestic hen. Poult Sci 57:1696–1700Google Scholar
  23. Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1979) Arms races between and within species. Proc R Soc Lond B 205:489–511Google Scholar
  24. Dhondt AA (1991) How unreliable are cuckoldry estimates using heritability analyses? Ibis 133:91–93Google Scholar
  25. Dixon A, Ross D, O'Malley SLC, Burke T (1994) Paternal investment inversely related to degree of extra-pair paternity in the reed bunting. Nature 371:698–700Google Scholar
  26. Dunn PO, Robertson RJ (1993) Extra-pair paternity in polygynous tree swallows. Anim Behav 45:231–239Google Scholar
  27. Dunning JB Jr (1993) CRC handbook of avian body masses. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  28. Evarts S, Williams CJ (1987) Multiple paternity in a wild population of mallards. Auk 104:597–602Google Scholar
  29. Frumhoff PC, Reeve HK (1994) Using phylogenies to test hypotheses of adaptation: a critique of some current proposals. Evolution 48:172–180Google Scholar
  30. Gelter HP, Tegelstrom H (1992) High frequency of extra-pair paternity in Swedish pied flycatchers revealed by allozyme electrophoresis and DNA fingerprinting. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:1–7Google Scholar
  31. Gibbs HL, Weatherhead PJ, Boag PT, White BN, Tabak LM, Hoysak DJ (1990) Realized reproductive success of polygynous red-winged blackbirds revealed by DNA markers. Science 250: 1394–1397Google Scholar
  32. Ginsberg JR, Rubenstein DI (1990) Sperm competition and variation in zebra mating behavior. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26: 427–434Google Scholar
  33. Grahn M (1992) Intra- and intersexual selection in the pheasant Phasianus colchicus. PhD thesis, Lund UniversityGoogle Scholar
  34. Graves J, Hay RT, Scallan M, Rowe S (1992) Extra-pair paternity in the shag, Phalacrocorax aristotelis as determined by DNA fingerprinting. J Zool 226:399–408Google Scholar
  35. Gullberg A, Tegelström H, Getter HP (1992) DNA fingerprinting reveals multiple paternity in families of great and blue tits (Parus major and P. caeruleus). Hereditas 117:103–108Google Scholar
  36. Gyllensten UB, Jakobsson S, Temrin H (1990) No evidence of illegitimate young in monogamous and polygynous warblers. Nature 343:168–170Google Scholar
  37. Harcourt AIL Harvey PH, Larson SG, Short RV (1981) Testes weight, body weight and breeding system in primates. Nature 293:55–57Google Scholar
  38. Hartley I, Shepherd M, Robson T, Burke T (1993) Reproductive success of polygynous male corn buntings (Miliaria calandra) as confirmed by DNA fingerprinting. Behav Ecol 4:310–317Google Scholar
  39. Harvey PH, Harcourt AH (1984) Sperm competition, testes size, and breeding systems in primates. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 589–600Google Scholar
  40. Harvey PH, Pagel M (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  41. Heske EJ, Ostfeld RD (1990) Sexual dimorphism in size, relative size of testes, and mating systems in North American voles. J Mammal 71:510–519Google Scholar
  42. Hill GE, Montgomerie R, Roeder C, Boag P (1994) Sexual selection and cuckoldry in a monogamous songbird: implications for sexual selection theory. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:193–199Google Scholar
  43. Hoffenberg AS, Power HW, Romagnano LC, Lombardo MP, McGuire TR (1988) The frequency of cuckoldry in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Wilson Bull 100:60–69Google Scholar
  44. Howard R, Moore A (1991) A complete checklist of the birds of the world (2nd edn). Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Hunter FM, Burke TA, Watts SE (1992) Frequent copulation as a method of paternity assurance in the northern fulmar. Anim Behav 44:149–156Google Scholar
  46. Jennions MD, Passmore NI (1994) Sperm competition in frogs: testis size and a ‘sterile male’ experiment on Chiromantis xerampelina (Rhacophoridae). Biol J Linn Soc 50:211–220Google Scholar
  47. Johnston RF (1992) Rock dove. In: Poole A, Stettenheim P, Gill F (eds) The birds of North America (no 13). Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and American Ornithologists' Union, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  48. Jones CS, Lessells CM, Krebs JR (1991) Helpers-at-the-nest in European bee-eaters (Merops apiaster): a genetic analysis. In: Burke T, Dolf G, Jeffreys AJ, Wolff R (eds) DNA fingerprinting: approaches and applications. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 169–172Google Scholar
  49. Kempenaers B, Verheyen GR, Broeck M van den, Burke T, Broeckhoven C van, Dhondt AA (1992) Extra-pair paternity results from female preference for high-quality males in the blue tit. Nature 357:494–496Google Scholar
  50. Kenagy GJ, Trombulak SC (1986) Size and function of mammalian testes in relation to body size. J Mammal 67:1–22Google Scholar
  51. Kusano T, Toda M, Fukuyama K (1991) Testes size and breeding systems in Japanese anurans with special reference to large testes in the treefrog, Phacophorus arboretus (Amphibia: Thacophoridae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:27–31Google Scholar
  52. Lank DB, Mineau P, Rockwell RF, Cooke F (1989) Intraspecific nest parasitism and extra-pair copulation in lesser snow geese. Anim Behav 37:74–89Google Scholar
  53. Lessells CM, Birkhead TR (1990) Mechanisms of sperm competition in birds: mathematical models. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:325–337Google Scholar
  54. Lifjeld JT, Dunn PO, Robertson RJ, Boag PT (1993) Extra-pair paternity in monogamous tree swallows. Anim Behav 45:213–229Google Scholar
  55. Lifjeld JT, Slagsvold T (1989) How frequent is cuckoldry in pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca? Problems with the use of heritability estimates of tarsus length. Oikos 54:205–210Google Scholar
  56. Lifjeld JT, Slagsvold T, Lampe H (1991) Low frequency of extra-pair paternity in pied flycatchers revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:95–101Google Scholar
  57. Marchant S, Higgins PJ (1990) Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds (vol 1, part B). Oxford University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  58. Martin PA, Dziuk PJ (1977) Assessment of relative fertility of males (cockerels and boars). J Reprod Fert 49:323–329Google Scholar
  59. Martin PA, Reimers TJ, Lodge JR, Dziuk PJ (1974) The effect of ratios and numbers of spermatozoa mixed from two males on proportions of offspring. J Reprod Fert 39:251–258Google Scholar
  60. Møller AP (1988a) Testes size, ejaculate quality, and sperm competition in birds. Biol J Linn Soc 33:273–283Google Scholar
  61. Møller AP (1988b) Ejaculate quality, testes size and sperm competition in primates. J Human Evol 17:479–488Google Scholar
  62. Møller AP (1989a) Frequency of extra-pair paternity in birds estimated from sex-differential heritability of tarsus length: reply to Lifjeld and Slagsvold's critique. Oikos 56:247–249Google Scholar
  63. Møller AP (1989b) Ejaculate quality, testes size and sperm production in mammals. Funct Ecol 3:91–96Google Scholar
  64. Møller AP (1991) Sperm competition, sperm depletion, paternal care, and relative testis size in birds. Am Nat 137:882–906Google Scholar
  65. Møller AP, Birkhead TR (1992a) Validation of the heritability method to estimate extra-pair paternity in birds. Oikos 64:485–488Google Scholar
  66. Møller AP, Birkhead TR (1992b) A pairwise comparative method as illustrated by copulation frequency in birds. Am Nat 139:644–656Google Scholar
  67. Møller AP, Birkhead TR (1994) The evolution of plumage brightness in birds is related to extrapair paternity. Evolution 48:1089–1100Google Scholar
  68. Mulder RA (1992) Evolutionary ecology of the mating system of superb fairy-wrens. PhD thesis, Australian National University, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  69. Mulder RA, Cockburn A (1993) Sperm competition and the reproductive anatomy of male superb fairy-wrens. Auk 110:588–593Google Scholar
  70. Mulder RA, Dunn PO, Cockburn A, Lazenby-Cohen KA, Howell MJ (1994) Helpers liberate female fairy-wrens from constraints on extra-pair mate choice. Proc R Soc Lond B 255:223–229Google Scholar
  71. Mumme RL, Koenig WD, Zink RM, Marten JA (1985) Genetic variation and parentage in a California population of acorn woodpeckers. Auk 102:305–312Google Scholar
  72. Olsen PD (1991) Do large males have small testes? A note on allometric variation and sexual size dimorphism in raptors. Oikos 60:134–136Google Scholar
  73. Oring LW, Fleischer RC, Reed JM, Marsden KE (1992) Cuckoldry through stored sperm in the sequentially polyandrous spotted sandpiper. Nature 359:631–633Google Scholar
  74. Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev 45:525–567Google Scholar
  75. Parker GA (1984) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating strategies. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 1–60Google Scholar
  76. Parker GA (1990) Sperm competition games: raffles and roles. Proc R Soc Lond B 242:120–126Google Scholar
  77. Payne RB, Payne LL (1989) Heritability estimates and behaviour observations: extra-pair matings in indigo buntings. Anim Behav 38:457–467Google Scholar
  78. Pinxten R, Hanotte O, Eens M, Verheyen RF, Dhondt AA, Burke T (1993) Extra-pair paternity and intraspecific brood parasitism in the European starling, Sturnus vulgaris: evidence from DNA fingerprinting. Anim Behav 45:795–809Google Scholar
  79. Purvis A (1991) Comparative analysis by independent contrasts, version 1.2: user's guide. Oxford University, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  80. Quinn JS, Woolfenden GE, Fitzpatrick JM, White BN (1990) DNA fingerprinting analysis of Florida shrub jay parentage. Do helpers help themselves? Abstracts, 108th Meeting of the American Ornithologist's Union, 29 June 1990, University of California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  81. Riley HT, Bryant DM, Carter RE, Parkin DT (1995) Extra-pair fertilizations and paternity defence in house martins Delichon urhica. Anim Behav 49:495–509Google Scholar
  82. Schulze-Haven K, Swatschek I, Dyrcz A, Wink M (1993) Multiple Vaterschaften in Bruten des Seggenrorhsängers Acrocephalus paludicola: erste Ergebnisse des DNA-Fingerprintings. J Ornithol 134:145–154.Google Scholar
  83. Sheldon BC, Burke T (1994) Copulation behavior and paternity in the chaffinch. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34:149–156Google Scholar
  84. Sherman PW, Morton ML (1988) Extra-pair fertilizations in mountain white-crowned sparrows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:413–420Google Scholar
  85. Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE (1990) Phylogeny and classification of birds: a study in molecular evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven and LondonGoogle Scholar
  86. Smith HG, Schantz T von (1993) Extra-pair paternity in the European starling: the effect of polygyny. Condor 95: 1006–1015Google Scholar
  87. Smith JNM, Zach R (1979) Heritability of some morphological characters in a song sparrow population. Evolution 33:460–467Google Scholar
  88. Smith HG, Montgomerie R, Põldmaa T, White BN, Boag PT (1991) DNA fingerprinting reveals relation between tail ornaments and cuckoldry in barn swallows, Hirundo rustica. Behav Ecol 2: 90–98Google Scholar
  89. Sodhi NS, Oliphant LW, James PC, Warkentin IG (1993) Merlin (Falco columharius). In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The birds of North America (no 44). Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and American Ornithologists' Union, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  90. Svärd L, Wiklund C (1989) Mass and production rate of ejaculates in relation to monandry/polyandry in butterflies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:395–402Google Scholar
  91. Triggs S, Williams M, Marshall S, Chambers G (1991) Genetic relationships within a population of blue duck Hymenolaimus malaorhynchos. Wildfowl 42:87–93Google Scholar
  92. Wedell N (1994) Spermatophore size in bushcrickets: comparative evidence for nuptial gifts as sperm protection device. Evolution 47:1203–1212Google Scholar
  93. Westneat DF (1987) Extra-pair fertilizations in a predominantly monogamous bird: genetic evidence. Anim Behav 35:877–886Google Scholar
  94. Westneat DF (1990) Genetic parentage in indigo buntings: a study using DNA fingerprinting. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:67–76Google Scholar
  95. Westneat DF (1992) Polygyny and extra-pair fertilizations in eastern red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phocniceus). Behav Ecol 4: 49–60Google Scholar
  96. Wetton JH, Parkin DT (1991) An association between fertility and cuckoldry in the house sparrow, Passer domesticus. Proc R Soc Lond B 245:227–233Google Scholar
  97. Winge Ø (1937) Succession of broods in Lehistes. Nature 140:467Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. P. Moller
    • 1
  • J. V. Briskie
    • 2
  1. 1.Zoological InstituteCopenhagen UniversityCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Department of BiologyQueen's UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations