Erkenntnis

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 1–25 | Cite as

Rawls' differenzprinzip und seine deutungen

  • Peter Koller
Article

Abstract

Rawls's difference principle, according to which social and economic inequalities are justified only if they achieve the greatest benefit of the least advantaged, has been often interpreted as a maximin-principle, in order to make it fit into the frame of welfare economics. Under this interpretation, however, the difference principle is subject to such grave objections, that it can hardly serve as a principle of justice. In order to avoid these difficulties, modifications of the difference principle have been proposed by Sen and Rae. But these proposals don't lead to acceptable resolutions either. As an alternative, a new interpretation of Rawls's difference principle is proposed, which brings out the reasonable core of this principle and, at the same time, repairs the shortcomings of its earlier interpretations.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliographie

  1. Albert, H.: 1978, Traktat über rationale Praxis, J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, K.J.: 1967, ‘Values and Collective Decision-Making’, in Philosophy, Politics and Society, 3rd series, ed. by P. Laslett and W.G. Runciman, Oxford 1967. S.215–232; zitiert nach der dt. Übersetzung: Werte und kollektive Entscheidungsfindung, in: Mathematische Methoden in der Politikwissenschaft, hrsg. von M.E.A. Schmutzer, Oldenbourg, München-Wien 1977, S.207–229.Google Scholar
  3. Arrow, K.J.: 1978, ‘Extended Sympathy and the Possibility of Social Choice’, Philosophia 7, 223–236.Google Scholar
  4. Barber, B.: 1975, ‘Justifying Justice: Problems of Psychology, Politics and Measurement in Rawls’, in Reading Rawls. Critical Studies on Rawls' ‘A Theory of Justice’, ed. by N. Daniels, Oxford 1975, S.292–318; zitiert nach der dt. Übersetzung: ‘Die Rechtfertigung der Gerechtigkeit: Probleme der Psychologie, der Politik und der Messung bei Rawls’, in Über John Rawls' Theorie der Gerechtigkeit, hrsg. von O. Höffe, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M. 1977, S.224–258.Google Scholar
  5. Bohnen, A.: 1964, Die utilitaristische Ethik als Grundlage der modernen Wohlfahrtsökonomik, O. Schwartz, Göttingen.Google Scholar
  6. Gibbard, A.: 1979, ‘Disparate Goods and Rawls' Difference Principle: A Social Choice Theoretic Treatment’, Theory and Decision 11, 267–268.Google Scholar
  7. Hammond, P.J.: 1976, ‘Equity, Arrow's Conditions, and Rawls' Difference Principle’, in Econometrica 44, 793–804.Google Scholar
  8. Harsanyi, J. C.: 1975, ‘Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls' Theory’, The American Political Science Review 69, 564–606; wiederabgedruckt in Harsanyi, Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior, and Scientific Explanation, D. Reidel, Dordrecht 1976, S.37–63.Google Scholar
  9. Mishan, E.J.: 1960, ‘A Survey of Welfare Economics 1939–1959’, The Economic Journal 70, 197–265; dt. ‘Ein Überblick über die Wohlfahrtsökonomik 1939–1959’, in Grundlagen der Wirtschaftspolitik, hrsg. von G. Gäfgen, 3. Aufl., Kiepenheuer&Witsch, Köln-Berlin 1970, S.110–176.Google Scholar
  10. Pazner, E.A. and D. Schmeidler: 1976, ‘Social Contract Theory and Ordinal Distributive Equity’, in Journal of Public Economics 5, 261–268.Google Scholar
  11. Plott, C.R.: 1978, ‘Rawls's Theory of Justice: An Impossibility Result’, in Decision Theory and Social Ethics, ed. by H.W. Gottinger and W. Leinfellner, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, S.201–214.Google Scholar
  12. Rae, D.W.: 1975, ‘Maximin Justice and an Alternative Principle of General Advantage’, in The American Political Science Review 69, 630–647.Google Scholar
  13. Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass. 1971; zitiert nach der dt. Ausgabe: Eine Theorie der Gerechtigkeit, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M. 1975.Google Scholar
  14. Schauenberg, B.: 1978, Zur Logik kollektiver Entscheidungen, Gabler, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  15. Sen, A.K.: 1970, Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Holden-Day, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  16. Sen, A.K.: 1973, On Economic Inequality, Oxford 1973; dt.: Ökonomische Ungleichheit, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M. 1975.Google Scholar
  17. Sen, A.K.: 1974, ‘Rawls versus Bentham: An Axiomatic Examination of the Pure Distribution Problem’, Theory and Decision 4, 301–309; zitiert nach der dt. Übersetzung: ‘Rawls versus Bentham: Eine axiomatische Untersuchung des reinen Verteilungsproblems’, in Über John Rawls' Theorie der Gerechtigkeit, hrsg. von O. Höffe, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M. 1977, S.283–295.Google Scholar
  18. Strasnick, S.: 1979, ‘Extended Sympathy Comparisons and the Basis of Social Choice’, Theory and Decision 10, 311–328.Google Scholar
  19. Wittman, D.: 1979, ‘A Diagrammatic Exposition of Justice’, Theory and Decision 11, 207–237.Google Scholar
  20. Wolff, R.P.: 1977, Understanding Rawls. A Reconstruction and Critique of ‘A Theory of Justice’, Princeton UP, Princeton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Co. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Koller
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für RechtsphilosophieUniversität GrazÖsterreichGermany

Personalised recommendations