Advertisement

Erkenntnis

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 147–164 | Cite as

Provisoes: A problem concerning the inferential function of scientific theories

  • Carl G. Hempel
Article

Keywords

Scientific Theory Theoretical Term Disturbing Factor Empirical Content Deductive Inference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carnap, R.: 1950, Logical Foundations of Probability, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. Carnap, R.: 1956, ‘The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts’, in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 1, H. Feigl and M. Scriven (eds.), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 38–76.Google Scholar
  3. Carnap, R.: 1963, ‘Arthur Pap on Dispositions’, in The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, P. A. Schilpp (ed.), Open Court, LaSalle, Illinois, pp. 947–52.Google Scholar
  4. Carnap, R.: 1966, Philosophical Foundations of Physics, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Craig, W.: 1956, ‘Replacement of Auxiliary Expressions’, Philosophical Review 65, 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feigl, H.: 1970, ‘The ‘Orthodox’ View of Theories: Remarks in Defense as Well as Critique’, in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 4, M. Radner and S. Winokur (eds.), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
  7. Hempel, C. G.: 1958, ‘The Theoretician's Dilemma’, in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 2, H. Feigl, M. Scriven, and G. Maxwell (eds.), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 37–98, reprinted in C. G. Hempel: 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press, New York, pp. 173–226.Google Scholar
  8. Hempel, C. G.: 1969, ‘On the Structure of Scientific Theories’ in Isenberg Memorial Lecture Series, 1965–66, Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, pp. 11–38.Google Scholar
  9. Hempel, C. G.: 1970, ‘On the ‘Standard Conception’ of Scientific Theories’, in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 4, M. Radner and S. Winokur (eds.), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 142–63.Google Scholar
  10. Holton, Gerald: 1978, ‘Subelectrons, Presuppositions, and the Millikan-Ehrenhaft Dispute’, in G. Holton, The Scientific Imagination, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 25–83.Google Scholar
  11. Millikan, Robert A.: 1917, The Electron, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, facsimile edition, 1963.Google Scholar
  12. Pap, A.: 1963, ‘Reduction Sentences and Disposition Concepts’, in The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, P. A. Schilpp (ed.), Open Court, LaSalle, Illinois, pp. 559–97.Google Scholar
  13. Putnam, H.: 1962, ‘What Theories are Not’, in Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski (eds.), Stanford University Press, pp. 240–51.Google Scholar
  14. Popper, K.: 1962, Conjectures and Refutations, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Putnam, H.: 1965, ‘Craig's Theorem’, The Journal of Philosophy 62, 251–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ramsey, F. P.: 1931, The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, edited by R. B. Braithwaite, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London; paperback reprint, 1960, Littlefield, Adams; Patterson, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  17. Sneed, J. D.: 1979, The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, 2nd ed., D. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stegmüller, W.: 1976, The Structure and Dynamics of Theories, Springer Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Suppe, F.: 1974, ‘The Search for Philosophic Understanding of Scientific Theories’, in The Structure of Scientific Theories, F. Suppe (ed.), University of Illinois Press, pp. 3–232, (second edition, with an added “Afterword”, 1977).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Carl G. Hempel 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl G. Hempel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations