Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 115–122 | Cite as

Variable resource defense by the Tana River crested mangabey

  • Margaret F. Kinnaird


Behavioral observations over 16 months of two groups of Tana River crested mangabeys (Cercocebus galeritus galeritus) in East Africa provide evidence, contrary to previous reports, for site-specific aggression and territorial exclusion. In addition, movements and vocal responses to neighboring group's long-call vocalizations vary temporally, reflecting seasonal variation in food availability and distribution. Patterns of response to neighboring groups are consistent with the hypothesis that resources should be defended only when it is economic to do so. When fruit resources are rare intergroup interactions are infrequent and groups use separate areas. As fruit availability increases, the distribution of diet species influences the type of interaction; peaceful intergroup interactions generally occur when mangabeys eat uniformly distributed species and aggressive interactions occur when mangabeys eat species with patchy distributions. Differences between male vocal responses and group spatial responses may reflect conflicting objectives of territorial defense by males and females.


Seasonal Variation Food Availability Crest Defend Behavioral Observation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Altmann S, Altmann J (1970) Baboon Ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL.Google Scholar
  3. Brown JH (1964) The evolution of diversity of avian territorial systems. Wilson Bull 76:160–169.Google Scholar
  4. Butynski TM (1990) Comparative ecology of blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis) in high- and low-density subpopulations. Ecol Monogr 60(1)1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapman C, Fedigan LM (1984) Territoriality in the St. Kits vervet, Cercopithecus aethiops. J Hum Evol 13:677–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox DR (1970) The analysis of binary data. Chapman and Hall, London UK.Google Scholar
  7. Davies NB, Houston AI (1984) Territory economics. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland MA, pp 148–169.Google Scholar
  8. Ewald PW, Carpenter FL (1978) Territorial responses to energy manipulations in the Anna hummingbird. Oecologia 31:277–292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Freund RJ, Littell RC (1981) SAS for linear models. SAS Institute, Raleigh NC.Google Scholar
  10. Gartlan JS, Brain CK (1968) Ecology and social variability in Cercopithecus aethiops and C. mitis. In: Jay P (ed) Primates: studies in adaptation and variability. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York NY, pp 253–293.Google Scholar
  11. Hamilton WJ III, Buskirk RE, Buskirk WH (1976) Defence of space and resources by chacma (Papio ursinus) baboon troops in an African desert and swamp. Ecology 57:1263–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Homewood KM (1976) Ecology and behavior of the Tana mangabey (Cercocebus galeritus galeritus). Unpublished PhD disseration, University of London, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Horn H (1968) The adaptive significance of colonial nesting in the brewers blackbird (Euphagus cyanocephalus). Ecology 49:682–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jolly A (1972) Troop continuity and troop spacing in Propithecus verreauxi and Lemur catta at Berenty (Madagascar). Folia Primatol 17:335–362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kavanagh M (1981) Variable territoriality among Tantalus monkeys in Cameroon. Folia Primatol 36:76–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kinnaird MF (1990) Behavioral and demographic responses to habitat change by the Tana river crested mangabey (Cercocebus galeritus galeritus). Unpublished Ph D dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville FL.Google Scholar
  17. Kinnaird MF (1992) Phenology of flowering and fruiting in an East African riverine forest ecosystem. Biotropica, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kodric-Brown A, Brown JH (1978) Influence of economics, inter-specific competition, and sexual dimorphism on territoriality in immigrant rufous hummingburds. Ecology 59:285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1983) Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, London UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marsh CM (1978) Tree phenology in a gallery forest on the Tana River, Kenya. E Afr Agric For J 43(4):305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Medley KE (1990) Forest ecology and conservation in the Tana River National Primate Reserve, Kenya. Unpublished Ph D disseration, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI.Google Scholar
  22. Mitani JC, Rodman PS (1979) Territoriality: the relation of ranging pattern and home range size to defendability, with an analysis of territoriality among primate species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morisita M (1959) Measuring the dispersion of individuals and analysis of the distributional patterns. Mem Fac Sci Kjyushu Univ Ser E (Biol) 2:215–235.Google Scholar
  24. Ostfeld RS (1985) Limiting resources and territoriality in microtine rodents. Am Nat 126(1):1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ostfeld RS (1990) The ecology of territoriality in small mammals. Trends Ecol Evol 5(12):411–415.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Robinson JG (1985) Expected benefits determine area defense: experiments with capuchin monkeys. Nat Geogr Res Rep 21:421–424.Google Scholar
  27. SAS (1985) SAS User's Guide. SAS Institute Incorporated, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  28. Schoener TW (1987) Time budgets and territory size: some simultaneous optimization models for energy maximizers. Am Zool 27:259–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman Press, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  30. Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  31. Struhsaker TT, Leland L (1979) Socioecology of five sympatric monkey species in the Kibale Forest, Uganda. Adv Study Behav 9:159–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Waser P (1975) Experimental playbacks show vocal mediation of intergroup avoidance in a forest monkey. Nature 255:56–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Waser P (1976) Cercocebus albigena: site attachment, avoidance, and intergroup spacing. Am Nat 110: 911–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Waser P (1982) The evolution of male loud calls among mangabeys and baboons. In: Snowdon CT, Brown CH, Petersen MR (eds) Primate communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, pp 117–143.Google Scholar
  35. Waser P, Floody O (1974) Ranging patterns of the mangabey, Cercocebus albigena, in the Kibale Forest, Uganda. Z Tierpsychol 35:85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Waser P, Homewood K (1979) Cost-benefit approaches to territoriality: a test with forest primates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:115–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Whitehead JM (1989) The effect of the location of simulated intruder on responses to long-distance vocalization of mantled howling monkeys, Alouata palliata palliata. Behaviour 108:73–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wrangham RW (1980) An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups. Behaviour 75:262–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yoshiba K (1968) Local and intertroop variability in ecology and social behavior of common Indian langurs. In: Jay PC (ed) Primates: studies in adaptability and variability. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York NY, pp 217–242.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margaret F. Kinnaird
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Wildlife and Range SciencesUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.The Institute of Primate ResearchNational Museums of KenyaKarenKenya

Personalised recommendations