Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 321–332 | Cite as

Production and transmission of honey bee queen (Apis mellifera L.) mandibular gland pheromone

  • Ken Naumann
  • Mark L. Winston
  • Keith N. Slessor
  • Glenn D. Prestwich
  • Francis X. Webster
Article

Summary

The social cohesiveness of eusocial insect colonies is maintained primarily through the utilization of pheromones. In this study we quantitatively elucidated the production, secretion, and transmission of 9-keto2(E)-decenoic acid (9-ODA), one of the components of the mandibular gland pheromone of the honey bee queen Apis mellifera; this is the only identified primer pheromone complex in the eusocial insects. Mated queens produce 12–400 μg of 9-ODA/day, or between 10% and 170% the average amount found in the glands at any one time. Approximately 0.5 μg of 9-ODA is maintained on the body surface of queens by an equilibrium between exudation, internalization, tracking on the comb, and removal by workers. Retinue bees, attending the queen, remove the greatest amount, although the role of the wax as both a sink and a medium for pheromone transfer has been previously underestimated. Only about 1 in 10 retinue workers pick up substantial quantities of pheromone while attending the queen and, within seconds, most of the acquired 9-ODA is found externally on the abdomen, or in the gut. These attendants, also called messenger bees, transfer 9-ODA to other workers, mostly through direct contacts, but also via the wax. A model evaluating the pathways and relative quantities of 9-ODA transferred throughout the nest is presented. As well as being important for a basic understanding of the system, the results have implications for the proper design and use of pheromones in bee management.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen MD (1957) Observations on honeybees examining and licking their queen. Br J Anim Behav 5:81–84Google Scholar
  2. Barbier ME, Lederer E (1960) Structure chemique de la “substance royale” de la reine d'abeille (Apis mellifera). CR Hebd Séanc Acad Sci, Paris 250:4467–4469Google Scholar
  3. Breed MD, Williams KR, Fewell JH (1988) Comb wax mediates the acquisition of nestmate recognition cues in honey bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:8766–8769Google Scholar
  4. Butler CG (1954) The method and importance of the recognition by a colony of honey bees (A. mellifera) of the presence of its queen. Trans R Entomol Soc Lond 105:11–29Google Scholar
  5. Butler CG (1960) Queen substance production by virgin queen honey-bees (Apis mellifera L.). Proc R Entomol Soc Lond (A) 35:170–171Google Scholar
  6. Butler CG, Fairey EM (1964) Pheromones of the honey bee: biological studies of the mandibular gland secretion of the queen. J Apic Res 3:65–76Google Scholar
  7. Butler CG, Simpson J (1958) The source of queen substance of the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Proc R Entomol Soc Lond (A) 33:120–122Google Scholar
  8. Butler CG, Simpson J (1967) Pheromones of the queen honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) which enable her workers to follow her when swarming. Proc R Entomol Soc Lond (A) 42:149–154Google Scholar
  9. Butler CG, Callow RK, Greenway AR, Simpson J (1974) Movement of the pheromone, 9-oxodec-2-enoic acid, applied to the body surfaces of honeybees (Apis mellifera). Entomol Exp Appl 17:112–116Google Scholar
  10. Conover WJ (1980) Practical nonparametric statistics. Wiley, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  11. Erp A van (1960) Mode of action of inhibitory substance of the honeybee queen. Insectes Soc 7:207–211Google Scholar
  12. Fergusson AW, Free JB (1980) Queen pheromone transfer within honeybee colonies. Physiol Entomol 5:359–366Google Scholar
  13. Free JB, Fergusson AW (1982) Transfer of pheromone from immature queen honeybees, Apis mellifera. Physiol Entomol 7:401–406Google Scholar
  14. Gary NE (1961a) Queen honey bee attractiveness as related to mandibular gland secretions. Science 133:1479–1480Google Scholar
  15. Gary NE (1961b) Antagonistic reactions of worker honeybees to the mandibular gland contents of the queen (Apis mellifera). Bee Wld 42:14–17Google Scholar
  16. Gerhke CW, Leimer K (1971) Trimethylsilylation of amino acids. Derivatization and chromatography. J Chromatogr 57:219–238Google Scholar
  17. Jay SC (1972) Ovary development of worker honeybees when separated from worker brood by various methods. Can J Zool 50:661–664Google Scholar
  18. Juška A (1978) Temporal decline in the attractiveness of honeybee queen tracks. Nature 276:261Google Scholar
  19. Juška A, Seeley TD, Velthuis HHW (1981) How honeybee queen attendants become ordinary workers. J Insect Physiol 27:515–519Google Scholar
  20. Kaminski L-A, Slessor KN, Winston ML, Hay N, Borden JH (1990) Honey bee responses to queen mandibular pheromone in laboratory bioassays. J Chem Ecol 16:841–850Google Scholar
  21. Korst PJAM, Velthuis HHW (1982) The nature of trophyllaxis in honeybees. Insectes Soc 29:209–221Google Scholar
  22. Lewis CT (1962) Diffusion of oil films over insects. Nature 193:904Google Scholar
  23. Montagner H, Galliot G (1982) Antennal communication and food exchange in the domestic bee Apis mellifera L. In: Breed MD, Michener CD, Evans HE (eds) The biology of social insects. Proceedings of the 9th Congress of the I.U.S.S.I. Westview Press, Boulder CO, 302–306Google Scholar
  24. Müssbichler A (1952) Die Bedeutung, äußerer Einfliisse” und der Corpora allata bei der Afterweiselentstehung von Apis mellifera. Z Vergl Physiol 34:207–227Google Scholar
  25. Pain J, Roger B (1978) Rhythme circadien des acides céto-9-décène-2 oique, pheromone de la reine, et hydroxy-10 décène-2 öique des ouvirières d'abeilles Apis mellifera ligustica S. Apidologie 9:263–272Google Scholar
  26. Pain J, Roger B, Theurkauff T (1974) Mise en évidence d'un saisonnier de la teneur en acides céto-9 et hydroxy-9 décène-2 öique des têtes de reines vierges d'abeille. Apidlogie 5:319–355Google Scholar
  27. Seeley TD (1979) Queen substance dispersal by messenger workers in honey bee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:391–415Google Scholar
  28. Seeley TD (1982) Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:287–293Google Scholar
  29. Seeley TD, Fell RD (1981) Queen substance production in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies preparing to swarm (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J Kans Entomol Soc 54:192–196Google Scholar
  30. Slessor KN, Kaminski L-A, King GGS, Borden JH, Winston ML (1988) Semiochemical basis of the retinue response to queen honey bees. Nature 332:354–356Google Scholar
  31. Slessor KN, Kaminski L-A, King GGS, Winston ML (1990) Semiochemicals of the honey bee queen mandibular glands. J Chem Ecol 16:851–860Google Scholar
  32. Vaitkevičiene GB, Skirkevičius AV (1982) Possible mode of communication of information on the queen's presence in a honey bee colony. Kemoretsept Nasekom 7:78–88Google Scholar
  33. Velthuis HHW (1972) Observations on the transmission of queen substances in the honey bee colony by the attendants of the queen. Behaviour 41:105–129Google Scholar
  34. Velthuis HHW (1976) Egg laying, aggression and dominance in bees. Proceedings of the XV International Congress of Entomology, Washington DC, pp 436–449Google Scholar
  35. Velthuis HHW, Es J van (1964) Some functional aspects of the mandibular glands of the queen honeybee. J Apic Res 3:11–16Google Scholar
  36. Verheijen-Voogd C (1959) How honey bees perceive the presence of their queen. Z Vergl Physiol 41:527–582Google Scholar
  37. Walton GM, Smith MV (1970) Effect of mandibular gland extirpation on acceptance of the honey bee queen. J Econ Entomol 63:714–715Google Scholar
  38. Webster FX, Prestwich GD (1988) Synthesis of carrier-free tritiumlabelled queen bee pheromone. J Chem Ecol 14:957–962Google Scholar
  39. Willis LG, Winston ML, Slessor KN (1990) Effect of synthetic honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) queen mandibular gland pheromone on suppression of worker ovary development. Can Entomol 122:1093–1099Google Scholar
  40. Winston ML (1987) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  41. Winston ML, Slessor KN, Willis LG, Naumann K, Higo HA, Wyborn MH, Kaminski LA (1989) The influence of queen mandibular pheromones on worker attraction to swarm clusters and inhibition of queen rearing in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Insectes Soc 36:15–27Google Scholar
  42. Winston ML, Higo HA, Slessor KN (1990) Effect of various dosages of queen mandibular gland pheromone on the inhibition of queen rearing in the honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 83:234–238Google Scholar
  43. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJGoogle Scholar
  44. Zmarlicki C, Morse R (1964) The effect of mandibular gland extirpation on the longevity and attractiveness to workers of queen honey bees, Apis mellifera. Ann Entomol Soc Am 57:73–74Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ken Naumann
    • 1
  • Mark L. Winston
    • 1
  • Keith N. Slessor
    • 2
  • Glenn D. Prestwich
    • 3
  • Francis X. Webster
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  2. 2.Department of ChemistrySimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryState University of New YorkStony BrookUSA
  4. 4.College of Environmental Science and ForestryState University of New YorkSyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations