Advertisement

Solar Physics

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 468–473 | Cite as

Evidence for electron excitation of type III radio burst emission

  • H. Alvarez
  • F. Haddock
  • R. P. Lin
Article

Abstract

Type III radio bursts observed at kilometric wavelengths (≲ 0.35 MHz) by the OGO-5 spacecraft are compared with > 45 keV solar electron events observed near 1 AU by the IMP-5 and Explorer 35 spacecraft for the period March 1968–November 1969.

Fifty-six distinct type III bursts extending to ≲ 0.35 MHz (≳ 50 R equivalent height above the photosphere) were observed above the threshold of the OGO-5 detector; all but two were associated with solar flares. Twenty-six of the bursts were followed ≲ 40 min later by > 45 keV solar electron events observed at 1 AU. All of these 26 bursts were identified with flares located west of W 09 solar longitude. Of the bursts not associated with electron events only three were identified with flares west of W 09, 18 were located east of W 09 and 7 occurred during times when electron events would be obscured by high background particle fluxes.

Thus almost all type III bursts from the western half of the solar disk observed by OGO-5 above a detection flux density threshold of the order of 10−13 Wm−2 Hz−1 at 0.35 MHz are followed by > 45 keV electrons at 1 AU with a maximum flux of ≳ 10 cm−2 s−1 ster−1. If particle propagation effects are taken into account it is possible to account for lack of electron events with the type III bursts from flares east of the central meridian. We conclude that streams of ≈ 10–100 keV electrons are the exciting agent for type III bursts and that these same electrons escape into the interplanetary medium where they are observed at 1 AU. The total number of > 45 keV electrons emitted in association with a strong kilometer wavelength type III burst is estimated to be ⩾ 5 × 1032.

Keywords

Flare Solar Flare Electron Event Solar Disk Radio Burst 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Friedman, M. and Hamberger, S. M.: 1969, Solar Phys. 8, 398.Google Scholar
  2. Graedel, T. E. and Lanzerotti, L. J.: 1971, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 6932.Google Scholar
  3. Graedel, J. E. and Lanzerotti, L. J.: 1972, Reply to Lin (1972) submitted to J. Geophys. Res. Google Scholar
  4. Haddock, F. T. and Alvarez, H.: 1970, Bulletin AAS 2, 196 (Abstract).Google Scholar
  5. Haddock, F. T. and Alvarez, H.: 1971, Bulletin AAS 3, 6 (Abstract).Google Scholar
  6. Hartz, T. R.: 1969, Planetary Space Sci. 17, 267.Google Scholar
  7. Kinsey, J. H.: 1970, Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 246.Google Scholar
  8. Lin, R. P.: 1970, Solar Phys. 12, 266.Google Scholar
  9. Lin, R. P.: 1972, Comments on a brief report by T. E. Graedel and L. J. Lanzerotti, ‘Interplanetary Particle Associations with Type III Solar Bursts,’ submitted to J. Geophys. Res. Google Scholar
  10. Lin, R. P. and Hudson, H. S.: 1971, Solar Phys. 17, 412.Google Scholar
  11. Lin, R. P., Kahler, S. W., and Roelof, E. C.: 1968, Solar Phys. 4, 338.Google Scholar
  12. MacRae, B. D.: 1968, University of Michigan, Radio Astronomy Observatory Technical Report, September.Google Scholar
  13. Maxwell, A., Howard, W. E., III, and Garmire, G.: 1960, J. Geophys. Res. 65, 3581.Google Scholar
  14. Sakurai, K.: 1971, Solar Phys. 16, 125.Google Scholar
  15. Smith, D. F.: 1970, Solar Phys. 15, 202.Google Scholar
  16. Westfold, K. C.: 1957, Phil. Mag. 2, 1287.Google Scholar
  17. Wild, J. P., Murray, J. D., and Rowe, W. C.: 1954, Australian J. Phys. 7, 439Google Scholar
  18. Wild, J. P., Sheridan, K. V., and Neylan, A. A.: 1959, Australian J. Phys. 12, 369Google Scholar
  19. Zirin, H.: 1966, Nature 212, 909.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Alvarez
    • 1
  • F. Haddock
    • 1
  • R. P. Lin
    • 2
  1. 1.Radio Astronomy Observatory, University of MichiganAnn ArborU.S.A.
  2. 2.Space Sciences Laboratory, University of CaliforniaBerkeleyU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations