Transportation

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 17–42 | Cite as

The measurement of accessibility: Some preliminary results

  • M. Q. Dalvi
  • K. M. Martin
Article

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of accessibility by private transport, using a Hansen type measure of accessibility. The data base is the 1962 London Travel Survey. The study is confined to car-owning households residing in inner London. A comparison of the patterns of accessibility associated with four measures of areal attractiveness - total employment, retail employment, households and population - is presented. The sensitivity of relative accessibilities to marginal changes in parameter values is analysed. Two aspects of the effect of the zoning system on the measurement of accessibility are investigated: the effects of zonal configuration and zonal aggregation. First, the implications of increasing the size of central area zones is analysed. Second, a comparison of patterns of accessibility calculated at the zonal and district levels is undertaken.[/p]

Keywords

Data Base Central Area District Level Technology Management Economic Geography 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angel, S. and Hyman, G. M. (1971). “Urban spatial interaction,” Environment and Planning, 3.Google Scholar
  2. Angel, S. and Hyman, G. M. (1972). “Urban transport expenditures,” Papers of the Regional Science Association, 29.Google Scholar
  3. Batty, M., Foot, D., Alonso, L., Bray, G., Breheny, M., Constable, D., Dubmore, K., Ellender, R., Shepherd, J., and Williams, J. (1973). “Spatial system design and fast calibration of activity interaction-allocation models,” Regional Studies, 7.Google Scholar
  4. Hansen, W. G. (1959). “How accessibility shapes land use,” Journal of American Institute of Planners, 3.Google Scholar
  5. Ingram, D. R. (1971). “The concept of accessibility: a search for an operational form,” Regional Studies, 5.Google Scholar
  6. Judge, E. J. (1974). “The concept of accessibility: some operational problems,” Leeds Polytechnic and the University of Leeds (mimeographed).Google Scholar
  7. Kassof, H. and Deutchman, H. D. (1968). “Trip generation — a critical appraisal,” Highway Research Record, 240.Google Scholar
  8. London Transportation Study, Vols 1–3, (1966–68). Freeman Fox, Wilbur Smith and Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Thomas, R. (1969). “Measures of Accessibility,” Political and Economic Planning, London, (mimeographed).Google Scholar
  10. Wilson, A. G. (1970). Entropy in urban and regional modelling, London: Pion.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Q. Dalvi
    • 1
  • K. M. Martin
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Transport StudiesUniversity of LeedsEngland

Personalised recommendations