Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 365–370 | Cite as

The relationship between male ornamentation and swimming performance in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata

  • Paul F. Nicoletto
Article

Summary

The objective of this study was to determine if three male ornaments in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) were reliable indicators of swimming performance. Tail shape and dorsal fin length were chosen because they are ornaments that are of primary importance in swimming, which is a major survival component of fitness in fish. The carotenoid pigments and especially their density are ornaments that are hypothesized to be long term indicators of male vigor. Carotenoid pigment density and swimming performance were significantly positively correlated, but there was no relationship between swimming performance and tail shape or dorsal fin length. These results indicate that density of carotenoid pigmentation may function as a male vigor indicator during mate choice. Tail shape and dorsal fin length are not related to swimming performance, and females probably could not use them as vigor indicators during mate choice. The results are discussed in terms of ornament function and adaptive and Fisherian hypotheses of female choice.

Keywords

Carotenoid Mate Choice Reliable Indicator Female Choice Swimming Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson M (1982) Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement. Biol J Linn Soc 17:375–393Google Scholar
  2. Andersson M (1986) Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40:804–816Google Scholar
  3. Andersson S (1989) Sexual selection and cues for female choice in leks of Jackson's widowbird Euplectes jacksoni. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:403–410Google Scholar
  4. Arnold SJ (1985) Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. Experientia 41:1296–1310Google Scholar
  5. Beamish FWH (1978) Swimming capacity. In: Hoar WS, Randall DJ (eds) Fish physiology, vol 7. Academic Press, New York, pp 101–187Google Scholar
  6. Bischoff RJ, Gould JL, Rubenstein DI (1985) Tail size and female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:253–255Google Scholar
  7. Brett JR (1964) The respiratory metabolism and swimming performance of young sockeye salmon. J Fish Res Board Can 21:1183–1226Google Scholar
  8. Brett JR, Glass NR (1973) Metabolic rates and critical swimming speeds of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in relation to size and temperature. J Fish Res Board Can 30:379–387Google Scholar
  9. Endler JA (1980) Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34:76–91Google Scholar
  10. Endler JA (1983) Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes. Environ Biol Fishes 9:173–190Google Scholar
  11. Farr JA (1980) Social behavior patterns as determinants of reproductive success in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata Peters (Pisces: Poeciliidae) — an experimental study of the effects of intermale competition, female choice, and sexual selection. Behavior 74:38–91Google Scholar
  12. Fisher RA (1958) The genetical theory of natural selection. Dover Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Fraser DF, Gilliam JF (1987) Feeding under predation hazard: response of the guppy and Hart's rivulus from sites with contrasting predation hazard. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:203–209Google Scholar
  14. Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218:384–387Google Scholar
  15. Heisler IL (1984) A quantitative genetic model for the origin of mating preferences. Evolution 38:1283–1295Google Scholar
  16. Heisler IL (1985) Quantitative genetic models of female choice based on ‘arbitrary’ male characters. Heredity 55:187–198Google Scholar
  17. Heisler IL, Andersson MB, Arnold SL, Boake CR, Borgia G, Hausfater G, Kirkpatrick M, Lande R, Maynard Smith J, O'Donald P, Thornhill AR, Weissing FJ (1987) The evolution of mating preferences and sexually selected traits. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, New York, pp 96–118Google Scholar
  18. Hill GE (1990) Female house finches prefer colourful males: sexual selection for a condition dependent trait. Anim Behav 40:563–572Google Scholar
  19. Houde AE (1987) Mate choice based upon naturally occurring color-pattern variation in a guppy population. Evolution 41:1–10Google Scholar
  20. Houde AE (1988) The effects of female choice and male-male competition on the mating success of male guppies. Anim Behav 36:888–896Google Scholar
  21. Jones DR, Kiceniuk JW, Bamford OS (1974) Evaluation of swimming performance of several fish species from the Mackenzie River. J Fish Res Board Can 31:1641–1647Google Scholar
  22. Kennedy CEJ, Endler JA, Poynton SL, McMinn H (1987) Parasite load predicts mate choice in guppies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:291–295Google Scholar
  23. Kirkpatrick M (1982) Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1–12Google Scholar
  24. Kirkpatrick M (1987) Sexual selection by female choice in polygynous animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:43–70Google Scholar
  25. Kodric-Brown A (1985) Female preference and sexual selection for male coloration in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:199–205Google Scholar
  26. Kodric-Brown A (1989) Dietary carotenoids and male mating success: an environmental component of female choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:393–401Google Scholar
  27. Kodric-Brown A, Brown JH (1984) Truth in advertising: the kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. Am Nat 124:309–323Google Scholar
  28. Lande R (1980) Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34:292–305Google Scholar
  29. Lande R (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:3721–3725Google Scholar
  30. Ligon JD, Thornhill R, Zuk M, Johnson K (1990) Male-male competition, ornamentation, and the role of testosterone in sexual selection in red jungle fowl. Anim Behav 40:367–373Google Scholar
  31. Maynard Smith J (1985) Sexual selection, handicaps and true fitness. J Theor Biol 115:1–8Google Scholar
  32. McLennan DA, McPhail JD (1989) Experimental investigations of the evolutionary significance of sexually dimorphic nuptial coloration in Gasterosteus aculeatus (L.): the relationship between male colour and male behavior. Can J Zool 67:1778–1782Google Scholar
  33. McMinn H (1990) Effects of the nematode Camallanus cotti on sexual and non-sexual behavior in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Am Zool 30:245–249Google Scholar
  34. Milinski M, Bakker CM (1990) Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males. Nature 344:330–333Google Scholar
  35. Nur N, Hasson O (1984) Phenotypic plasticity and the handicap principle. J Theor Biol 110:275–297Google Scholar
  36. O'Donald P (1980) Genetic models of sexual selection. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. O'Donald P (1983) Sexual selection by female choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 53–66Google Scholar
  38. Partridge L, Endler JA (1987) Life history constraints on sexual selection. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, New York, pp 247–264Google Scholar
  39. Pomiankowski A (1987a) The costs of choice in sexual selection. J Theor Biol 128:195–218Google Scholar
  40. Pomiankowski A (1987b) Sexual selection: the handicap principle does work — sometimes. Proc R Soc London Ser B 231:123–145Google Scholar
  41. Price TD, Alatalo RV, Charlesworth B, Endler JA, Halliday TR, Hamilton WD, Heller KG, Milinski M, Partridge L, Parzefall J, Peschke K, Warner R (1987) Constraints on the effects of sexual selection. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, New York, pp 279–294Google Scholar
  42. SAS Institute (1982) SAS user's guide: statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  43. Seger J (1985) Unifying genetic models for the evolution of female choice. Evolution 39:1185–1193Google Scholar
  44. Smit H (1965) Some experiments on the oxygen consumption of goldfish (Carassius auratus L.) in relation to swimming speed. Can J Zool 43:623–633Google Scholar
  45. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Stahlberg S, Peckmann P (1987) The critical swimming speed of small Teleost fish species in a flume. Arch Hydrobiol 110:179–193Google Scholar
  47. Vogel S (1989) Life in moving fluids. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  48. Wyszecki G, Stiles WS (1967) Color science. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Yamamoto T (1975) The medaka, Oryzias latipes, and the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. In: King RC (ed) Handbook of genetics, vol 4. Vertebrates of genetic interest. Plenum Press, New York, pp 133–149Google Scholar
  50. Yates GT (1983) Hydromechanics of body and caudal fin propulsion. In: Webb PW, Weihs D (eds) Fish biomechanics. Prager, New York, pp 177–247Google Scholar
  51. Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection — a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–214Google Scholar
  52. Zeh DW, Zeh JA (1988) Condition-dependent sex ornaments and field test of sexual-selection theory. Am Nat 132:454–459Google Scholar
  53. Zuk M, Thornhill R, Ligon JD (1990) Parasites and mate choice in red jungle fowl. Am Zool 30:235–244Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul F. Nicoletto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations